|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
8 Apr 2005, 21:10 (Ref:1273663) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 422
|
71 312pb
Did it have a normal V12 or the Flat like the later cars?
|
||
|
8 Apr 2005, 21:12 (Ref:1273664) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
Flat i think .
yes . 180degrees V12 .. 2.991,8cc Last edited by Dani Filth; 8 Apr 2005 at 21:15. |
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
10 Apr 2005, 11:50 (Ref:1274623) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,626
|
Indeed, it was a revised version of the F1 engine, 440bhp at 10.800 RPM max complementing Dani's precise data about the engine. (The F1 version was 470bhp at 12.600 RPM for the sake of comparison)
|
||
|
10 Apr 2005, 14:56 (Ref:1274735) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
I could be horribly wrong but I believe the b stands for "boxer".
|
||
__________________
Oops |
10 Apr 2005, 15:02 (Ref:1274738) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
in fact on the Ferrari site . the 1971 sportscar is called just 312P .
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
10 Apr 2005, 18:59 (Ref:1274918) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,626
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Apr 2005, 01:43 (Ref:1275960) | #7 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,157
|
Had to share this, which I found doing a quick poke around.
http://www.fiehler.nl/ferrari/wf00022.html Is that not a delicious sports car? When did the Boxer first get use in the F1 car, was that in 1970? I know it was used in the sports cars in 1971, when Ferrari developed the 312PB for the endurance championship, having largely lost faith in the 512 concept I guess, or else planning for the future robert |
||
|
12 Apr 2005, 06:43 (Ref:1276028) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
agree . that's one delicious sportscar
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
12 Apr 2005, 08:57 (Ref:1276089) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
A bit o/t but this guy made a working 1/3 model of a 312P in 7 years.
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pierre.scerri/ |
||
|
12 Apr 2005, 09:36 (Ref:1276116) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,626
|
First use of the boxer was indeed in 1970, the move from the 312 v12 to the 312B. But check the following text!!!!
Found in http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...php&carnum=154 Outwardly similar to a boxer engine, the Forghieri was a flat V-engine. The difference between a boxer and a flat V engine is the shape of the crank and the ignition sequence; a boxer engine's opposing pistons move towards each other whereas a V engine's pistons move in unison. The big advantage over the 60 degree V12 engine used in the previous 312 P was the low height of the 180 degree engine. This helped to decrease the car's overall height and to lower the centre of gravity, which helped handling. Last edited by brielga; 12 Apr 2005 at 09:40. |
||
|
12 Apr 2005, 12:12 (Ref:1276238) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
The '71 312P was very fast - faster than the Alfa T33 and the 908/3s, both of which claimed vioctories during the season. It was, however, extremely unlucky, being taken out in two separate events by the same backmarker! In any case, the '71 car was always going to struggle to beat the JWA 917s, especially on faster circuits, but Ferrari got all the development and bad luck out of the way that season, hence their incredible 100% record in 1972. |
|||
|
12 Apr 2005, 23:53 (Ref:1276744) | #12 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,157
|
Quote:
robert |
|||
|
13 Apr 2005, 08:16 (Ref:1276908) | #13 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Yes, great looking car and interesting subject, but, just to be pedantic, given its age, wouldn't this be better in the historics thread?
Last edited by John Turner; 13 Apr 2005 at 08:17. |
||
|
13 Apr 2005, 15:46 (Ref:1277254) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Maybe where the thread would get a different viewing audience and subsequently be assigned to history too?
|
||
|
13 Apr 2005, 16:11 (Ref:1277273) | #15 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
The thread, wherever it is, will eventually be consigned to history, anyway. So .... maybe now would be a good time to move it to get that different viewing audience and just possibly extend its life with some fresh comments, or .... maybe not! Still think it would sit more obviously there though!
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ferrari 312PB | Edmonton | Motorsport History | 25 | 10 Nov 2006 16:06 |