|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
25 Mar 2010, 21:45 (Ref:2660108) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
Virgin fuel tank too small
Is this for real? It's a GMM story and no one else has picked it up other than SPEED so???
http://formula-one.speedtv.com/artic...-finish-races/ REALLY? How can you make a mistake like this if you had fuel consumption numbers for the engine months in advance??? |
||
|
25 Mar 2010, 22:12 (Ref:2660118) | #2 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,018
|
Fuel consumption depends on the car as much as the engine, especially as the cars are quite draggy. A silly mistake, but if there is a mistake it is not to realise that fuel consumption depends on more than just the engine. They had low levels of experience here.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
25 Mar 2010, 23:01 (Ref:2660141) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
Surely they must have had an idea of the drag co-efficient when calculating down force levels and fuel consumption. They would need to know this for wing design, angles etc. would they not? Someone with Nick Wirths' experience would have double checked the numbers IMO. Having said that, they do everything on a razors edge in F1. Perhaps the CFD numbers were not quite as accurate as they had hoped? I wish the team all the best, it will just take them a little longer to get there now.
|
||
|
25 Mar 2010, 23:54 (Ref:2660163) | #4 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
|||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
26 Mar 2010, 00:53 (Ref:2660175) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,578
|
Not the first time it's happened either. Getting the numbers right based on estimates with different circuits etc is not an exact science & they clearly went a bit too aggressive.
I've seen F1 cars need to build in bigger tanks or when the regs allowed add extra tanks. One car had as many as 11 small tanks (yep, 11) fitted to the car & connected at the first race of the season. Teething trouble but they'll sort it out. Surprised that the testing didn't pick it up though. |
||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
26 Mar 2010, 01:16 (Ref:2660181) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
This was dismissed as nonsense before Bahrain
|
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
26 Mar 2010, 01:30 (Ref:2660187) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
This is clearly rubbish. The new times are likely to have been the most conservative on something like this.
|
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 02:13 (Ref:2660196) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Well well well...it's true, then. As confirmed on 5 Live now
The other teams have been informed that Virgin can change their chassis |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
26 Mar 2010, 02:14 (Ref:2660197) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 544
|
The BBC are pretty convinced that the rumour is true. 12 litres short allegedly.
However, this is completely academic as the Virgin doesn't have enough hydraulic fluid to complete the race either. |
||
__________________
Louise: Is the track Slippery when Wet? DC: I didn't know you were a Bon Jovi fan |
26 Mar 2010, 02:16 (Ref:2660198) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
I am sure they will get a bigger one soon.. It's ONLY a joke before you complain..
|
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 02:17 (Ref:2660200) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,935
|
Just come through from another source as well.
Oh well, looks like using all the computers for the CFD meant they didn't have enough for some of the basic design issues |
||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
26 Mar 2010, 02:18 (Ref:2660201) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,935
|
|||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
26 Mar 2010, 02:23 (Ref:2660205) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Moderator...
I do apologise, just a little humour ...We need some humour once in a while... Moderator... |
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 08:27 (Ref:2660265) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
I'm glad the teams have seemingly agreed to let Virgin make htis change. The damage to F1's image from the team dawdling around trying to reach the end on limited fuel is greater than the threat of Virgin actually beating any of them. It shows just what a bad set of choices the FIA made with the new teams, only the second Lotus application look a decent choice so far.
|
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 08:35 (Ref:2660266) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,355
|
This could hardly have been a more unfortunate mistake for a team whose name sponsor operates an airline to make, I think we'll see some humorous and, for Virgin, embarassing comment on this soon.
Never mind as long as the wings don't come off. |
|
|
26 Mar 2010, 08:54 (Ref:2660272) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,881
|
What, like during the '84 season to the end of the turbo era when cars ran out on a regular basis?
|
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 09:41 (Ref:2660289) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,258
|
, and when the chasis is re homologated, i wonder if it has an extra hole or two for a possible F Duct
|
||
__________________
Why oh Why oh Why |
26 Mar 2010, 10:21 (Ref:2660303) | #19 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
|
Unfortuneatly they have bigger problems than needing an f-duct at the moment
|
|
|
26 Mar 2010, 10:23 (Ref:2660305) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 389
|
|||
|
26 Mar 2010, 10:58 (Ref:2660321) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,013
|
"Formula One is not a finishing school. Either you come prepared, or prepare to fail. This is the pinnacle of world motorsport". - David Coultard
The PINNACLE of motor sport, yea that's what it is! |
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 11:09 (Ref:2660325) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
Apparently a team of taxi-drivers have been drafted in to teach Timo and Lucas how to go everywhere in fifth and freewheel down hills.
|
|
|
26 Mar 2010, 11:44 (Ref:2660348) | #23 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 425
|
How big a job is this? As they have to resubmit for crash testing, I assume that they'll need to build an extra chassis? Do they have to build c.4 new chassis's or can they modify what they have? I'd assume that building 4 completely new chassis's would financially cripple the team.
|
||
|
26 Mar 2010, 12:02 (Ref:2660359) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,525
|
They could just buy smaller drivers.
|
||
__________________
ยินดีที่ได้รู้จัก |
26 Mar 2010, 12:48 (Ref:2660375) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 813
|
So now we know there's at least one team that's hoping for a Safety Car this weekend...
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Porsche Fuel Tank | chapmanite | Classic Cars | 5 | 4 May 2011 17:40 |
Reserve fuel tank | Colin McKay | Racers Forum | 47 | 6 Sep 2009 10:03 |
Fuel tank regs! | HrRACING | Hillclimb and Sprint | 1 | 5 Mar 2007 12:39 |
New to Cadet Karting, fuel/fuel tank question | Paulc | Kart Racing | 6 | 2 Jun 2006 08:14 |
Fuel tank advice? | daj | Historic Racing Today | 8 | 6 Feb 2006 11:59 |