|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
19 Mar 2007, 05:02 (Ref:1871040) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,382
|
Mines bigger than yourssssss.
V8 Supercars on Seven are bigger than the Formula 1 Grand Prix Release Date: 19/03/2007 Seven’s record-breaking coverage of the Clipsal 500 in Adelaide on 3-4 March – the opening round of this year’s V8 Supercar Championships - has out-delivered Ten’s coverage of the Formula One Australian Grand Prix. Seven’s Saturday coverage of the Clipsal 500 delivered 200,000 more viewers than Ten’s Saturday coverage of the Australian Grand Prix (a whopping 59% audience advantage to V8 Supercars). Seven’s Sunday coverage of the Clipsal 500 was up 95,000 viewers on the average audience of Ten’s entire Sunday coverage of the Australian Grand Prix, a 15% audience advantage. Saturday: Clipsal 500 - 710,000 AGP 540,000 Sunday: Clipsal 500 - 615,000 AGP 340,000 Seven’s coverage of the Clipsal 500 delivered a 34% jump in audience on day 1 and a 46% jump in audience on day 2 vs last year’s coverage on Ten. |
||
|
19 Mar 2007, 05:45 (Ref:1871052) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,042
|
Tockley wars, as purile as some of my posts......
|
||
__________________
Nothing really worth putting. |
19 Mar 2007, 06:20 (Ref:1871061) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 474
|
Let's see how the international figures compare.
|
|
|
19 Mar 2007, 06:38 (Ref:1871064) | #4 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
There will only ever be One KING OF THE MOUNTAIN! |
19 Mar 2007, 07:36 (Ref:1871082) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,632
|
Can we compare the telecasts for a moment. Channel 7 showed 3 races on both days.
Channel 10 showed Qualifying Saturday, the celeb race and the GP on Sunday - the rest was fluff heavily biased towards Toyota. My friend and I are big F1 fans but we spent most of the weekend playing xBox360 as we didn't want to sit through all the garbage Channel 10 were showing around the racing. |
||
|
19 Mar 2007, 08:33 (Ref:1871126) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
i watched #10 and they repeated several segments especially ones on McLaren/Fernando/Lewis, #7 did a little on that front but no where near as bad as #10, so atleast you seen more on #7, one thing they both have in common is taking excesive ads at the wrong time.
instead of comparing sizes, why not try to work out a better telecast, remember it's not size that matters it's what you do with it . |
||
|
19 Mar 2007, 11:55 (Ref:1871302) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 510
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
"It was dry for the second go-around. Grice, nervous, worrying about his Bathurst jinx, ran 2:25.9. The amazing Brock, using every last centimetre of bitumen, yet keeping the car straight and balanced and at full noise, came back with a staggering 2:20.0 as if to say: "Match that". And people just shook their heads, bit their lips and wondered who would be second". RIP Peter Brock. 1945-2006 |
19 Mar 2007, 12:24 (Ref:1871330) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
and this bit - "Seven’s Sunday coverage of the Clipsal 500 was up 95,000 viewers on the average audience of Ten’s entire Sunday coverage of the Australian Grand Prix, a 15% audience advantage." what's the average bit? - anyone know what the figures were for, say, 2.00 - 3.00pm on each Sunday? are they including how many people were watching the F1 at, for example, in Brisbane, 9.00 a.m. on Saturday morning (not many, I'll bet!) not that I don't trust Coch not to massage the stats wonder how many were watching in South America/ Finland/ Timbuktu .... Last edited by Rick; 19 Mar 2007 at 12:27. |
|||
|
19 Mar 2007, 14:01 (Ref:1871397) | #9 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 Mar 2007, 15:03 (Ref:1871449) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
yep, but to put the last comment into a form without inuendo, you can have a shorter coverage and not repeat segments every day of the telecast and show it once, same amount of racing less repeating = shorter telecast but less people getting peeved off at seeing the same crap several times over just for the perpose to make it seem like a bigger better telecast, it turns out bigger and boringer as aposed to shorter and more interesting.
|
||
|
19 Mar 2007, 16:35 (Ref:1871513) | #11 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 138
|
I'm confused - this paragraph is from an article in the media section of THE AUSTRALIAN newspaper today:
"Ten could also celebrate its coverage of the Formula One Australian Grand Prix, with an average audience of 1.036 million viewers, well up on last year's figure." That is a lot different to what Seven/avesco stated.....so someone is telling porky's and I am sure all would agree that The Australian newspaper has more credibility than avesco...... |
|
|
19 Mar 2007, 23:24 (Ref:1871854) | #12 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
|
I thought Rusty and even Murray looked like they were unsure of themselves in interviews and Darryl Beatie has no idea, that interview with Bernie was a disgrace. Cant wait for the GP's to hit Europe and get Martin Brundle and Co. back on the telecasts. As for the V8's nobody will do a better job than Ten did, it just does not look or feel the same anymore.
|
|
|
19 Mar 2007, 23:38 (Ref:1871865) | #13 | |
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 170
|
I agree, what was with the Bernie interview? I'm sure he's not easy to interview, but Darryl's line of questions were terrible.
And any interview he did, or any report at all he did, was either really basic/simple in their delivery, or at times didn't make sense at all.... |
|
|
19 Mar 2007, 23:58 (Ref:1871885) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
What is it with that mob. Do they think everyone are drongo's and just accept what they put out? Talk about massaging the figures!! Here is a far more straightforward one, Mr Avesco.......how many people watched the Clipsal race compared to how many watched the GP. Let me give you the answer - more watched the GP. Now go massage that number for us, will ya? Last edited by touring fan01; 20 Mar 2007 at 00:07. |
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 00:12 (Ref:1871897) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
The average audience figure is just that; the average number over the whole telecast (just like calculating the average lap speed around the whole track). But their figure is comparing the very peak audience number for the Clipsal race with only the average audience number for the GP. That's like comparing an average lap speed for one car, with the peak top speed of another car down the straight! Last edited by touring fan01; 20 Mar 2007 at 00:15. |
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 00:15 (Ref:1871900) | #16 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 138
|
Once again it proves why mainstream media dont take v8s seriously. The Clipsal numbers were good yet they have to go out and lie and state incorrect numbers that no-one believes.
A message to Tony Cochrane - you have a good sport that is quite popular but moronic acts like this undo all the good work - wake up!! |
|
|
20 Mar 2007, 00:22 (Ref:1871905) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
|
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 01:27 (Ref:1871937) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
well said Da Moo.
but if they think people are really going to look st those figures and believe them he is massaging somthing other than the figures. but as Da Moo said he has got a good popular sport but don't make it all look stupid and do silly stuff like that. |
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 04:19 (Ref:1871980) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,269
|
I am sure Channel 10 are now looking at this and laughing. Yes, without the V8's 10 had alot to fill in. And yes, they probably did a poor job. But I am sure that nationally they drew more viewers on an average!
I have a feeling AVESCO have taken the V8 coverage and averaged it over the time period it was telecast and done the same for 10. 10 had how many more hours of coverage? And this reeks a little to me. If 9 can get 1.5 million viewers in sydney alone for an NRL match, I am sure that F1 can do a million or so nationally. And V8's would be "on par". In the end, instead of focussing on a ****ing contest with 10, maybe they should worry about trying to create a product that attracts as many casual fan as possible as well as appeasing the regular enthusiast. I am sure the time spent creating that press release could have been better put to researching what music we want in broadcasts or what interviews we'd like to see. |
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 09:03 (Ref:1872090) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
They compared V8's peak figure spike (which may have been for just, say,a single 15 minute period) with F1's average figure over the whole day. They are not even comparing like for like. Last edited by touring fan01; 20 Mar 2007 at 09:08. |
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 09:22 (Ref:1872109) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
so let me guess this straight touring fan01 comes on rattles off some numbers without any support for their information, without quoting any source and suddenly thise figures are gospel. come on you suckers, for all you know touring fan could be a channle ten spin doctor. lok at things a bit objectively.
If you all could just post your pin numbers here that would be appreaciated |
|
|
20 Mar 2007, 09:27 (Ref:1872116) | #22 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
20 Mar 2007, 09:28 (Ref:1872117) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,893
|
Quote:
I wasn't rattling off numbers without 'support'. I was merely clarifying the way they used the numbers (in the original post) that were given out by V8SCA! They are being disingenuous and ignore the comparitive peak viewing figures of each telecast or the total amount of viewers over the whole day. It's very simple...which race had the most viewers? The GP - yet they try to pretend it's different by using 'averages' which take into account all the other non-race broadcast time (there is more non main-race time in the GP telecast). Last edited by touring fan01; 20 Mar 2007 at 09:34. |
||
|
20 Mar 2007, 09:35 (Ref:1872127) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
sure prove it.
|
|
|
20 Mar 2007, 09:58 (Ref:1872156) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,893
|
Prove what?
The figures released show that the GP achieved a higher peak audience than the V8's acheived with a their peak audience. That's just fact and that's comparing like for like. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bigger and better.... | MolsonBoy | Motorsport Art & Photography | 6 | 5 Oct 2004 16:46 |
Is James Allen Getting Bigger? | frostblade | Formula One | 28 | 26 Feb 2004 21:16 |
Bigger Rockingham turnout? | Snapper Baz | National & Club Racing | 20 | 17 Oct 2002 08:56 |
Bigger Grids----> | adamp_uk | Touring Car Racing | 5 | 11 Feb 2002 20:38 |