|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
13 Oct 2012, 10:33 (Ref:3150823) | #1 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
FIA/ACO to create universal GT class
Not a lot to go on at this point but over in Fuji there has been a press conference to say that the FIA/ACO are setting up a working group to look at creating one GT class for somewhere around 2015.
John Dagys first to break it from what I can see. Check his tweets here: https://twitter.com/johndagys Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A lot to digest. Thoughts... |
||||
|
13 Oct 2012, 11:18 (Ref:3150848) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Article here: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103398
A class that has a concrete rulebook like GTE, but with the reduced costs of GT3 is the aim. So manufacturers only need to build one car. There will be a transition period apparently so existing cars are not made redundant. |
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 11:25 (Ref:3150851) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
Last edited by arakis; 13 Oct 2012 at 11:35. |
|||
|
13 Oct 2012, 11:46 (Ref:3150865) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
You would have to conclude that assuming they don't screw this up, that this merger of GT rules is very favourable.
|
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 11:54 (Ref:3150866) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
I mean it'll never be as good as it was at the start of 997 vs 430 era...but nothing ever will...I thought they're just gonna re badge the GT3, but this is actually something I could live with,,, |
|||
|
13 Oct 2012, 11:54 (Ref:3150867) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Good thing they would not invest on two GT classes for a single car. Thank God!
Still, at least they didn't force the GT500 class to merge into the FIA GT class since they're already merge with DTM. |
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 12:03 (Ref:3150872) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,192
|
It will be a success, if they can control manufacture spent on cars, if the cars cost increase, a new low cost class will appear and we will finish like we are now, with only the manufacturers spending on the high class development.
This can really push back few manufactures that now could be thinking to start to develop by zero a GTE, the Mclaren seems very interested in GTE so beyond that car that will or has already been started to be developed, I mean. Maybe that's (Mac was going to be the last GTE) what the FIA/ACO thought. Last edited by urdragon; 13 Oct 2012 at 12:12. |
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 12:43 (Ref:3150886) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
It does make you wonder whether there really were going to be GTE versions of the likes of the Z4, SLS etc. Maybe there still will be in the interim if they feel it makes sense.
With the whole thing opened up you'd have to have some kind of GT qualification for Le Mans if it proves to be half as popular as GT3. I assume this also removes a potentially tough decision for the ALMS/Grand-Am folks with a transition year in '14 followed by a new GT class in '15. |
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 13:02 (Ref:3150893) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
|
Am I the only one not excited about this? GT2 has at least 2 new manufacturers coming in. GT3 is the most successful formula ever. Hundreds of them have been sold. Both have provided incredibly close competition. And what do we do? We throw them out. We already have a capacity grid at Le Mans, do we need a more popular class? P1-P2 was looking promising to displace GTE-AM. GT3 certainly cannot become more popular, everyone is making a GT3 car. But we will not have any more newcomers if a rule change is nigh. And if the cars are supposed to be closer to production form, how are they going to convince ANYONE that their car will be able to compete a 458/458 successor or McLaren with slicks and wings? If it is not broke, don't fix it (new rules), and do not break it (8.0 litre engines for one car).
|
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 13:20 (Ref:3150900) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 632
|
Interesting news.
Here's hoping there's some form of technical specification/governance in the final product's regulations. Enacting a global monopoly with a purely BoP-based formula's bound to create a world of pain. As far as cost-capping is concerned, there's an element of uncertainty. There's certainly decent opportunity as far as sales (and, support concerning which) are concerned. It'll be interesting to see whether the concept works (i.e. allows for sufficient revenue) on a larger scale, particularly with such a large volume of providers. It's interesting cost-capping's been mentioned at all, with GTE having been predominantly manufacturer-oriented; the current scenario doesn't appear to have placed too significant a barrier upon entry for interested marques. Quote:
There's no longer a need for the unified series to accommodate both GTE and (GA's specific flavour of) GT3 beyond 2015. They have a decent amount of time to decommission their adaptation of GT3, and provide for solely two GT classes (i.e. unified GTE/3, GTX) within the overall structure. Last edited by R4z3rw33n; 13 Oct 2012 at 13:28. |
|||
__________________
"I was proceeding down the road. The trees on the right were passing me in orderly fashion at 60 miles per hour. Suddenly one of them stepped in my path." - John Von Neumann. |
13 Oct 2012, 14:09 (Ref:3150912) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,586
|
If they will be able to crop some useless machinery and get real GTs in one set of rules for most of the championships then it would be better for sport - less conspiracy BoP theories.
|
||
__________________
ACO-Ratel-Lotti group of "entertainpreneurs" soon will make you think that Reverse-Gear-Racing is the most professional series in the world. "Faccio il pane con la farina che ho". |
13 Oct 2012, 14:13 (Ref:3150913) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Quote:
So unless you want to look at the same group of cars (many of which are already getting on in life) trundling on for the next four years something new needs to come along. It's not tenable for manufacturers to have to make two versions the same car. I also disagree about Le Mans/capacity issues. The GT grid there and in the WEC this year has been poor and a clear weak link in the series. |
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 14:35 (Ref:3150922) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
This announcement does sound promising but I hope this new class doesn't become a BoP mess. There has to be a different set of rules under the same class to accommodate the differences in some cars.
It also makes sense that this new class is coming around 2015. By then, the number of P2s will most likely decrease due to their transition phase. We come see more GTs at Le Mans and WEC grids when the rules come into effect. |
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 14:52 (Ref:3150930) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
|
But wouldn't the manufacturers just roll out a replacement? Like Ferrari did with the 430-458 and Aston the DBRS9-V12 Vantage. Audi will just build a GT3 version of the R8 replacement, BMW the Z4, and so on. Old models will phase out and new ones will come in. The models will phase in and out, but the formula should be constant. Coming out with new rules is what will lead to us looking at the same cars for years as no one will invest in new machinery. Durheimer must be furious; the rules intended completely change after 2014, Bentley's first full season. The future regulations could prevent the Conti from competing after that.
|
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:00 (Ref:3150934) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
What exactly do they intend on doing ?
Upping GTE to a new GT class , and leaving GT3 for the AM kinda class ? |
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:02 (Ref:3150936) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,264
|
Merge the 2 so there's 1 GT class.
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
13 Oct 2012, 15:05 (Ref:3150937) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
|
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:06 (Ref:3150938) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Yeah but you could build a new car for in theory similar cost that would be eligible for both classes.
So Ferrari could roll out one replacement instead of two. That's the entire point. Imagine a manufacturer on the outside looking in when this actually gets put into place. If done right you'd have a car you could sell to gentleman drivers and be able to go and compete at Le Mans as a manufacturer. Will be interesting to see what Ratel thinks about this. Will he embrace it and keep the 'World' tag or again create a haven for older machinery. It is interesting to see how this fits in with prospective manufacturers. Bentley certainly are one of the ones affected in terms of what they could sell in their first full season. But you can't park a new concept that could be of huge benefit long-term just because it puts out one manufacturer. |
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:09 (Ref:3150940) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,264
|
How will this stop Bentley? They'll make accomodations to fit in all who are racing currently in either class or those who have announced an entry into either class....
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
13 Oct 2012, 15:14 (Ref:3150943) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
|
If it does work, and proves to be as popular as GT3, how will they determine which of the 200 applicants get a WEC or Le Mans entry?
|
|
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:16 (Ref:3150945) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Quote:
So with Bentley planning to develop in '13 and sell in '14, this could limit the number of years you could run it for. If I'm a customer I'd probably just stick with what I had for the extra year and buy a new regs car in '15 that you know you'll get 3/4+ seasons out of. if they'd budgeted to sell x amount of GT3's it could hurt them. |
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:19 (Ref:3150946) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
|||
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:24 (Ref:3150949) | #23 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 185
|
SO.... Gt4 will be the new Gt3?? there will be a gt5 category as well?
|
||
|
13 Oct 2012, 15:50 (Ref:3150958) | #24 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 474
|
I think I will never like GT racing as much as I did from 2001-2006-ish with proper multi-class racing. I like the idea of having a Faster GT Class and a Slower One.
What can I say I grew up playing GTR and watching FIA GT as part of the LG Super Weekend package, so that's my idea of GT racing. I guess I always have some form of solace with the (Dutch) Supercar Challenge... |
||
__________________
If you ever want anything written regarding Motorsport I am here for you! It only matters if it has a motor... |
13 Oct 2012, 16:28 (Ref:3150975) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Re-introduction of multi-class GT structure in ACO-style racing? | Deleted | ACO Regulated Series | 49 | 21 Apr 2014 16:46 |
[FIA GT] FIA/ACO GT regulations | ger80 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 14 Jul 2006 23:23 |
[FIA GT] why did the FIA kill the GT1 class in FIA GT? | CVT | Sportscar & GT Racing | 42 | 16 Nov 2003 01:48 |
Seqential Tranny in ACO GT class? | RacingManiac | ACO Regulated Series | 12 | 4 Jul 2003 02:27 |