Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 May 2012, 08:53 (Ref:3075591)   #1
quantic
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
England
In the ghetto
Posts: 48
quantic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Formula ford rear suspension geometry

Hi all, i'm in the process of rebuilding an old FF2000 Royal RP30 - now that it's almost done i'm starting to think about setting it up and one thing that im not too sure about is one part of the rear suspension geometry, and that is the two almost parallel trailing arms from just in front of the engine to the rear upright. Both are adjustable for length, but i can't quite work out what the effect of adjusting them would be and why i would need to, and what i should be measuring to see if any adjustment is even required (which i'm sure it will as i've replaced some of the rose joints, and as much as ive tried to put them back in the same place thats not really satisfactory to my mind..)
My best guess is that they affect the arc which the upright will go through as the suspension moves up and down, perhaps something to do with squat or dive, but even if i'm right (probably not!) i still dont know what i should be looking for.
Many thanks
quantic is offline  
Quote
Old 17 May 2012, 11:24 (Ref:3075659)   #2
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Adjustment to the length of both trailing links affects the toe setting at the rear - shorter = more toe-in, longer = more toe-out as such adjustments either pull the upright forward or push the upright backwards. If the trailing links are parallel then the toe setting should remain constant as the suspension moves up and down and any camber changes will be determined by the wishbone length and angles alone.

With non-parallel links, each link will follow a slightly different arc at the wheel upright end, resulting in the top and bottom of the upright moving forwards/rearwards at slightly different rates. For example, if the top trailing link is horiztontal when the car is at ride height and the lower trailing link runs downwards towards the rear of the car, under compression (i.e. as the wheel moves up) the top of the upright will be pulled forwards and the bottom of the upright will be pushed backwards. This will cause an increase in negative camber, however slight, and also an increase in toe-out, however slight. So, adjusting the lengths of the trailing links can be used to adjust dynamic camber and toe settings.

edit: The angle of the trailing links, relative to each other and to the ground, is what affects dive/squat. Their length has no effect on this.

Last edited by phoenix; 17 May 2012 at 11:31.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 17 May 2012, 14:57 (Ref:3075739)   #3
ianpearson
Racer
 
ianpearson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
oxfordshire
Posts: 458
ianpearson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantic View Post
Hi all, i'm in the process of rebuilding an old FF2000 Royal RP30 - now that it's almost done i'm starting to think about setting it up and one thing that im not too sure about is one part of the rear suspension geometry, and that is the two almost parallel trailing arms from just in front of the engine to the rear upright. Both are adjustable for length, but i can't quite work out what the effect of adjusting them would be and why i would need to, and what i should be measuring to see if any adjustment is even required (which i'm sure it will as i've replaced some of the rose joints, and as much as ive tried to put them back in the same place thats not really satisfactory to my mind..)
My best guess is that they affect the arc which the upright will go through as the suspension moves up and down, perhaps something to do with squat or dive, but even if i'm right (probably not!) i still dont know what i should be looking for.
Many thanks
We have an RP30 at home, the trailing arms will be for adjusting out your bump steer so that when you move the rear wheel through its suspension travel it does not change the tow settings. Camber is adjusted with the top link running from the chassis brace to the upright & tow in or out is adjusted with the two rod ends on the bottom wishbone.

What are you looking at racing the car in? check out the classic formual ford 2000 page on facebook if you are on there

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Univer...27436007366707

Last edited by ianpearson; 17 May 2012 at 15:11.
ianpearson is offline  
Quote
Old 17 May 2012, 15:00 (Ref:3075741)   #4
quantic
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
England
In the ghetto
Posts: 48
quantic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks phoenix, that's very helpful-it does raise one more question for me though and that is that there is a rose joint on the lower rear wishbone to upright joint which I had assumed was for adjusting the rear toe. If I am to adjust the rear toe with trailing arms, what does this one do?!
quantic is offline  
Quote
Old 17 May 2012, 16:47 (Ref:3075794)   #5
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by quantic View Post
Thanks phoenix, that's very helpful-it does raise one more question for me though and that is that there is a rose joint on the lower rear wishbone to upright joint which I had assumed was for adjusting the rear toe. If I am to adjust the rear toe with trailing arms, what does this one do?!
Your assumption is correct. The rose joint mentioned is the one you should use to set the toe. In my post I was trying to explain the effect of adjusting the trailing link lengths. The effect is on toe (and potentially camber and caster). You shouldn't use the trailing links to adjust toe - just to correct toe changes in bump/rebound once static toe has been set. However, changing the length will have the side effect of affecting static toe - even if it is by only a small amount. Hence static toe should be re-checked after adjusting the trailing links.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 17 May 2012, 20:53 (Ref:3075888)   #6
quantic
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
England
In the ghetto
Posts: 48
quantic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok, thanks both-thats pretty much cleared up my query.
Ian, i bought the car with the intention of doing the Historic FF2000 races, but i have some date clashes with other commitments that will stop me doing some of those (plus the fact i havent finished putting it together yet!) and so may well do one or two URS rounds too
quantic is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
suspension geometry 5portsrock Racing Technology 3 7 Jan 2010 11:01
Suspension Geometry Maurotoro Racing Technology 14 6 Jun 2008 17:04
Wierd F1 Suspension Geometry shiny side up! Racing Technology 23 3 Dec 2003 02:35
Suspension Geometry Skelly Racing Technology 2 1 Sep 2002 14:03


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.