|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 May 2003, 21:32 (Ref:600320) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 422
|
Single Engine
A while back Brock Yates suggested for cart that they have one engine but have manufactures. This would mean you would have a similar set up like this year and manufactures would be able to badge their name on the engine. This seems like a neat idea-it would have much lower costs and could perhaps encourage more manufactures to enter the series since they wouldn't have to spend huge sums of money on the development programs they would have if they had different engines for each comapny. What do you think?
|
||
|
15 May 2003, 21:49 (Ref:600348) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 693
|
Never happen. Manufacturers like to have control over thier own destiny when they enter a series and if they all had the same engine it's a total **** shoot.
|
||
__________________
When asked facetiously if he knew he’d ruined a good story line by beating Patrick, Wheldon responded bluntly, “Don’t care one bit.” |
15 May 2003, 21:52 (Ref:600351) | #3 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 May 2003, 22:50 (Ref:600390) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 732
|
Re: Single Engine
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 May 2003, 23:38 (Ref:600403) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
Last edited by Lee Janotta; 15 May 2003 at 23:39. |
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
16 May 2003, 01:31 (Ref:600445) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 390
|
Although I don't like the idea I believe the point was to continue to have Ford(for example) keep producing the Cosworth engine but badge some as Ford, some as Jaguar, some as Lincoln, some as Mazda,etc. That would make sense I guess, It's kind of like the Nascar boys arguing which engine is better the Chevy or the Pontiac.
Last edited by brightline; 16 May 2003 at 01:32. |
||
|
16 May 2003, 02:21 (Ref:600465) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
Very stupid. Everyone would know that the engines were the same and it would provide none of the reasons companies get involved in racing.
It would be different if each manufacturer had a "starter" engine that they could only change in certain ways. For instance the 3.0L V6 Ford put in the Taurus is also in the Mazda 6S and Lincolns, not to mention the Aston Martin 6L V12 started it's design life as two of those V6s. Mazda's engine is a lot different than Ford's, but uses the same block. |
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
17 May 2003, 07:12 (Ref:601601) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
The manufacturers wouldn't go for it.
If one manufacturer picked what turned out to be a dud team, they wouldn't be able to do a thing about it. Also, how could the manufacturer who's team was dominating advertise that they had anything to do with helping them win? |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
17 May 2003, 08:22 (Ref:601623) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,071
|
One thing I wouldn't mind is to see Ford badge a few of the engines as their other brands, for eg Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar etc, but I know this won't happen for many reasons (and as a huge Blue Oval fan, I quite like the current prospect of Ford winning every race )
Imagine PT winning a race in a Volvo powered car...hehe |
||
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Single engine supply proposed for 2004 | mortda | Formula One | 18 | 6 Jan 2003 19:11 |
The single best car from a single race! | Legend | Formula One | 1 | 29 Jul 2002 22:49 |
Toyota Single Turbo engine win! | Robin Plummer | ChampCar World Series | 2 | 1 Aug 2000 16:10 |