|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Mar 2009, 12:16 (Ref:2420899) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
KERSwatch I : Who'll be running KERS at Melbourne?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/73818
So Ferrari are, as are Renault. Will McLaren and BMW follow suit? I think so, but we'll have to find out. Don't Force India use the McLaren unit - wouldn't they be guineapigs, perhaps? Do Brawn have a KERS system cooked up, or will they be running one from Woking that comes with the engine? |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Mar 2009, 12:46 (Ref:2420913) | #2 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,142
|
BMW will be using their KERS system at the first race.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/n...melbourne.html I believe Honda may have had a Flybrid system in the pipeline, but that was shed a while ago. Brawn have so far said they have no plans to use a KERS this season. |
|
|
21 Mar 2009, 13:31 (Ref:2420932) | #3 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Pretty sure McLaren are KERS ready.
They spent so much time working on it they forgot to make a chassis. |
|
|
21 Mar 2009, 14:01 (Ref:2420963) | #4 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
I would think that if Renault are KERS ready then RBR will also have had the decision made for them.
|
|
|
22 Mar 2009, 17:23 (Ref:2422098) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 184
|
I know that Williams will be running the flywheel KERS but if they use it at the first race I don't know. All I know is that it's gonna be an interesting weekend!
|
||
__________________
Murray Walker: There is some debate as to whether Roset is Formula 1 material." Martin Brundle: "It's a pretty short debate Murray." |
22 Mar 2009, 17:45 (Ref:2422110) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
||
|
23 Mar 2009, 03:42 (Ref:2422415) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,707
|
Quote:
I agree, then disadvantages of Kers depend largely on the extra weight and how that affects your weight distribution. Renault could have a system ready but RBR may have a chassis and set up which is disrupted by the addition of Kers.. |
|||
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now" Douglas Adams. 1952-2001 |
23 Mar 2009, 08:21 (Ref:2422493) | #8 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
It could be a political decision.
|
|
|
23 Mar 2009, 10:48 (Ref:2422588) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
||
|
23 Mar 2009, 15:00 (Ref:2422808) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 184
|
I was just reading the online magazine, GPweek, and it said in there that the 3 teams that are definitely running it in Melbourne are Ferrari, Renault and McLaren.
http://mag.gpweek.com/ |
||
__________________
Murray Walker: There is some debate as to whether Roset is Formula 1 material." Martin Brundle: "It's a pretty short debate Murray." |
23 Mar 2009, 15:04 (Ref:2422811) | #11 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
TBH I would find out how it goes in Friday practice before commiting myself to using it in the race.
|
|
|
23 Mar 2009, 15:10 (Ref:2422813) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,067
|
Yeh I was about to say, that's a little bit definitive, isn't it?
Some again maybe just throwing it out there to try and confuse competition? But at the same time, why would they bother lol I'm really intrigued to see how effective this is. Also, how will it be conveyed graphically on screen? Much alike A1, do we think? Also, do you think we'll have graphics for the front wing adjustments? I know this is ever so slightly off topic, but the KERS is on topic Selby |
||
|
23 Mar 2009, 15:31 (Ref:2422827) | #13 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
And commentary on 'wing flaps' will probably be similar to that of an air-show I would think. I'm also not too sure about all this 'interactive' stuff,maybe they'll be just too much of it ? |
||
|
24 Mar 2009, 00:31 (Ref:2423222) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
|||
|
24 Mar 2009, 00:45 (Ref:2423234) | #15 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
||
|
24 Mar 2009, 07:44 (Ref:2423355) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,219
|
Anyone know of how far in advance of a race weekend you would need to make a go/no go decision on it?
|
||
|
24 Mar 2009, 09:11 (Ref:2423406) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
Quote:
No other teams have said alything like this that I'm aware of, so this exact situation seems unique to Toyota's design rather than unique to KERS. As most teams seem to have different fuel tanks, radiators, electronics and engine covers between KERS specifications they might still be making the decision before the freight departure even though the monocoques are compatible with either. |
||
|
24 Mar 2009, 09:58 (Ref:2423441) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
They will know right now, before all the races have even started. It will all be simulated and calculated - at some circuits there might be an advantage, at others not.
|
|
|
25 Mar 2009, 03:40 (Ref:2424148) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,219
|
I'm sure it's been simulated to death but surely there is also development work going on in factories that changes timelines and calculations.
|
||
|
25 Mar 2009, 08:45 (Ref:2424257) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Well there might be I suppose, but no team is going to waste set-up time on a massive set-up change such as Kers or no Kers. Too many variables to weight distribution etc.
|
|
|
25 Mar 2009, 16:23 (Ref:2424550) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Lee McKenzie on Twitter on who will be running KERS
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
25 Mar 2009, 16:32 (Ref:2424556) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Kubica is quite bit bigger than Heidfeld, so presumably Nick gets the Kers.
|
|
|
26 Mar 2009, 09:35 (Ref:2425099) | #23 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,142
|
I saw it said somewhere that it will just be Heidfeld using it.
|
|
|
26 Mar 2009, 13:32 (Ref:2425252) | #24 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
So 'Quick Nick' gets a (supposed) advantage because Kubica is considered to be a bit of a 'Porker' ?
|
|
|
26 Mar 2009, 13:37 (Ref:2425255) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
He's not considered to be - he just is a lot bigger, and can't lose any more weight without becoming weak/unfit. Same with Webber - much reduced options for moving ballast around.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will anyone bother with KERS ? | Marbot | Formula One | 135 | 29 Jan 2009 03:01 |
Are KERS safe ? | Marbot | Formula One | 71 | 5 Oct 2008 01:01 |
KERS for Dummies? | diffuser | Racing Technology | 23 | 19 Aug 2008 22:31 |
KERS - looking costly | spectator22 | Formula One | 8 | 24 Jun 2008 01:03 |
KERS and you! | Chatters | Road Car Forum | 19 | 18 Apr 2008 08:48 |