|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 Jun 2008, 12:38 (Ref:2230038) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
|
GARRA Daytona Prototypes
Will there ever be a class at Le Mans for the Grand Am prototypes? Or do they fit into a current class at the moment. We don't see much of them in Europe they are beautifuly ugly beasts
Just like to know thats all .. couldn't find any info on it elsewhere. |
||
|
16 Jun 2008, 12:47 (Ref:2230050) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
No. (And thank god for that).
|
|
|
16 Jun 2008, 12:53 (Ref:2230054) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 840
|
I wonder how many laps they could do at Le Mans, in 24 hours.
|
|
__________________
"Without racing there is no Honda". Soichiro Honda |
16 Jun 2008, 13:36 (Ref:2230073) | #4 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
|
I don’t think they would have such a problem finishing after all they are built with cost control in mind so I expect the production based motor to be pretty well bullet proofed. I think they would have a problem with pace after all they were developed because the organisers where worried by the speed of the WSC at Daytona. Doubt they would be up to LMP1 speed down the mulsanne.
I reckon GT1 place maybe judging by the speed of them at Le Mans this weekend. Just something I was thinking about while watching Le Mans thinking of what might be considered at the ACO meeting today. Rightly or wrongly, I see GARRA as outsiders in the grand scheme of things and maybe with closed top prototypes now being the thing to have at Le Mans it might be a chance to get a bit of unity in world sports car racing. Just wanted to see what you all think.. deggis clearly thinks it a bad idea =D |
||
|
16 Jun 2008, 13:44 (Ref:2230075) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 322
|
RLM talked about this possibility on Saturday night - pacewise they reckoned that DP's would be slower than either LMP class and that the GrandAm GT's would be slower than either GT class...
|
|
|
16 Jun 2008, 14:10 (Ref:2230086) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,484
|
What about a little tradeoff, the top 10 cars at the Daytona24 gets an invite for LeMans and the top 10 at LeMans gets an invite for the Daytona24?
On a more serious note, considering how much problems the DPs had at this years Daytona24 with only one car really running problemfree and so many cars breaking I'm not sure any of those 10 cars would finish at LeMans at all. Those DPs are quite fragile for being endurace cars, and also slow, with the many long straights at LeMans they would most likely be outpaced by the GT1 cars too. And getting the Grand-Am GTs to LeMans would never works as its besicly GT3 cars. |
||
|
16 Jun 2008, 14:17 (Ref:2230089) | #7 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Jun 2008, 14:51 (Ref:2230108) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Quote:
Quote:
...and then up to ACO & IMSA, regarding the airborne moments we've seen this year, think about the bumpy oval section... Last edited by deggis; 16 Jun 2008 at 14:53. |
|||
|
16 Jun 2008, 15:17 (Ref:2230124) | #9 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
Quote:
If GARRA ever allowed LMPs to race at the 24hrs at Daytona it would be the end of the series. The series is built around Daytona and a big reason for teams to be in the DP-class is that they can race for overall wins at Daytona in it. Now if they were relegated to a secondary status at the series most important event, those who could afford it would buy an LMP and race it in ALMS, those who can't would have every right to be P.O'd by GARRA and race elsewhere as well. What I would like to see is some kind of trade-off between GARRA and IMSA, that allowed ALMS to race at Daytona(ideally a "Daytona Finale" in late October/November) and Watkins Glen and GARRA at Mosport and Road Atlanta. |
|||
|
16 Jun 2008, 15:31 (Ref:2230130) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,208
|
The engines wouldn't be a challenge to get to last the 24, it's more the other parts. The banking load on the CV joints at Daytona seems to be a destroyer. The cars would run fine, but think it would be the last class or in a fight with the GT2s, the top end just doesn't seem to be high enough to compete with LMPs ot GT1 on the Mulsanne.
As for the Daytone idea, I know it was a classic enduro but the track just doesnt do anything for me. The only reason I usually watch is race withdrawal by that point in the spring. Rovals just aren't too interesting but wouldn't mind seeing the ALMS cars at the long course at Watkins Glen Last edited by broadrun96; 16 Jun 2008 at 15:34. |
|
|
16 Jun 2008, 15:39 (Ref:2230133) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Quote:
|
||
|
16 Jun 2008, 15:47 (Ref:2230138) | #12 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Jun 2008, 16:02 (Ref:2230147) | #13 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Jun 2008, 21:21 (Ref:2230424) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 612
|
Pace wise they would probably be a little faster than the GT2 cars. Grand-Am did away with GT1 (I think it was still called GTS back then) because they were faster than the DP cars. They tried running them with smaller fuel cells so that they would have to pit so many times that they couldn't upstage the "premier class", but they finally just killed it off and created a GT3 class. As for their reliability, I remember being at the Rolex 24 when none of the DP cars could finish the race and it was won by Kevin Buckler in a GT2 Porsche...
|
||
|
16 Jun 2008, 23:52 (Ref:2230482) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 243
|
No thanks...Nascar taxi cabs lumbering around LeMans does nothing for me. I prefer technologically advanced cars not castrated, tube framed, spec racers. GARRA is about the drivers not the cars. For me, the cars come first and the drivers are secondary.
|
||
|
17 Jun 2008, 03:16 (Ref:2230535) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,208
|
Remember there used to be a class at LM for NASCAR spec cars. Ok, so it was back when they actually were close to stock cars and I think only a few ever showed up.
As for the DPs, wish they were allowed to be opened up alot more but the focus of the class is cost minimization, which helps with having larger fields but doesn't do alot for competition. With any luck the new body work will make them more tolerable but I haven't had a chance yet this season after Daytona to catch a race. GT at least has a chance to be interesting with the tube frame cars meaning other makes could join but still leaves the feeling of how close to the actual cars are the racers? |
|
|
17 Jun 2008, 11:07 (Ref:2230713) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
I would like to see the GA DPs allowed into the LMP2 class and vis versa.
Rember the last time team corvette ran in the Daytona 24 hour, the corvettes qualifed 1st overall ( yet the rules committee made the corvettes and other GT cars start behind the DPs) and finshed first over all. That was the last time team corvette raced at Daytona. |
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
17 Jun 2008, 13:46 (Ref:2230812) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
That was 2001, and they were racing against SRP-Is and SRP-IIs in the prototype ranks, not DPs.
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
17 Jun 2008, 17:25 (Ref:2231279) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 932
|
I can't imagine the ACO enforcing Grand-Am DP regs in full, nor G-A sending over a scrutineering team to do so, which seems to me, were DPs to be legal, to result in a special Le Mans spec. The compromise would be to homologate and scrutinize the DP engines as if they were GT engines, ignoring the G-A rpm limits, thus producing Le Mans specific DP engines. The spec tire rule would also be ignored, possibly the steel brake restriction, and maybe even the spec rear wing.
Given the DPs with their spec tires, spec wing, steel brakes, and restricted engines are just a tick slower than the GT1 Corvettes on shared tracks, depending on the exact details of the Le Mans spec I don't have a problem imagining them to be quicker than GT1, but who would want to go through all the modifications? |
|
|
18 Jun 2008, 01:06 (Ref:2231556) | #20 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
|
Another GARRA thread, another bashfest, another thread for the mods to ignore.
|
|
|
18 Jun 2008, 01:52 (Ref:2231575) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
I don't get the point of this thread really, why is it people who for the most part apparently don't like these cars, want them added to the series/genre that they do like? Is there a shortage of quality entries at LM? Regarding the GT3/Grand AM GT level cars, you can bet at some point those will be the lower GT class. It seems quite cyclical, that a higher class gets phased out, and replaced with a lower class... that over time gets too quick and expensive, and is replaced again with another lower class... Danske - I think if the DP's did the mod's such as brakes, tires to ALMS spec..., I would imagine they would be quicker than GT1's at many tracks, but slower at a track like LM, as they just don't have the aero. They are designed to suit the North American tracks, and with mods probably would beat the GT1's in North America. Not too different than in the past with the R&S MkIII's, great cars in North America, not so much in Europe. |
|||
|
18 Jun 2008, 02:10 (Ref:2231578) | #22 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
|
||
|
18 Jun 2008, 03:04 (Ref:2231590) | #23 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
The "DP formula" also includes bogus NASCAR-style full course cautions as well. The "DP formula" is designed to remove as many variables as possible and place the emphasis on the drivers. Hey, I know lets put them out there in a bunch of identically prepared Pontiacs and let the best driver win. Wait a minute, didn't Grand-Am used to be called IROC? |
|||
|
18 Jun 2008, 03:50 (Ref:2231601) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Let's not get into the ridiculous or sublime arguments. If you want me to get out the stats from last year, the ALMS actually had closer overall finishes than Grand Am did. You don't get closer than LM just did, between two manufacturers, after 24 hours very often. Regarding your one or two makes crack... you mean like a field of Rileys? These arguments are plain silly. Spec Diesel VW Golf series makes for close, competitive racing too. However, neither a spec VW Golf series, nor DP's are the type of cars that the vast majority of people who have been sportscar fans for very long like as premier cars. It is a simple reality that many people don't like the DP's, or Grand Am. This reality shows up on message boards, and the attendance of most of the events, excepting Daytona 24. Instead of an inferiority complex over this reality, it is time that some people simply realize and accept this. We ACO/ALMS sportscar fans realize this isn't as popular as NASCAR or F1, but we don't get bent out of shape when that is suggested... well except this silly F1 thread here. Last edited by Fogelhund; 18 Jun 2008 at 03:59. |
|||
|
18 Jun 2008, 06:14 (Ref:2231619) | #25 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Check the ALMS official board and the GARRA official board. Which board has more thread bashing the other series and other series' cars? Then you'll see who has the real inferiority complex. Face it, ACO racing is dying in this country. Save for a few rich boys with a few bucks to waste in a year buying a Zytek or a 3 year old Courage, what does the ALMS have going for it? Shaw? Panhard? The BMW prototype? Oh yeah, next year; it'll be here next year. I've been hearing next year for the past 5 years. GARRA never promises but they deliver. Scott Atherton could take a major cue from Edmondson in that department. Do not dare to be so ignorant and think you speak for "many" sportscar fans, Brett. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A quick question about the Daytona Prototypes... | DiscoGoober | North American Racing | 14 | 16 Oct 2003 03:01 |
Daytona Prototypes...mid engine rockets? | H16 | North American Racing | 19 | 27 Jun 2003 15:54 |
Daytona Prototypes.... | ZXKawboy | North American Racing | 26 | 6 Jan 2003 05:01 |
Daytona Prototypes | SurfXTC | North American Racing | 38 | 22 Dec 2002 14:15 |
Daytona Prototypes? | H16 | North American Racing | 22 | 18 Feb 2002 05:24 |