Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Clubmans Rallycross Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Other Motorsports > Rallying & Rallycross

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 Mar 2003, 02:17 (Ref:529476)   #1
Radisichrox
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
New York
Posts: 1,424
Radisichrox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
1996

Why in 1996 did the WRC not go to Monte Carlo or RAC? :confused:
Radisichrox is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Mar 2003, 04:29 (Ref:529547)   #2
rdjones
Take That Fan
Veteran
 
rdjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
England
Leeds, Yorkshire
Posts: 9,126
rdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridrdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridrdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridrdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
They where both part of the 2 litre Championship, but not the WRC, as there was a rotation system in those days.
rdjones is offline  
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! !
Quote
Old 9 Mar 2003, 07:45 (Ref:529757)   #3
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Every rally worked on a 3 year rotation, 2 years in as counting for each championship, one year counting for the 2 Litre championship.

Not sure what year it was brought in, or why, 1993 maybe?. For example Finland & the Safari didn't count for the WRC in 1995, and in 1994 Australia didn't count. In 1997 though all rallies were admitted back in each year.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 10 Mar 2003, 01:42 (Ref:530845)   #4
Radisichrox
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
New York
Posts: 1,424
Radisichrox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Huh..That's bizarre. I guess it was less work for the teams and more emphasis on scoring points in every round.
Radisichrox is offline  
__________________
Super Touring for life
Quote
Old 10 Mar 2003, 09:35 (Ref:531074)   #5
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I wouldn't mind seeing that rule brought back in. 9 or so rounds a year would allow drivers to compete in more events, like national championship rounds or so, how many A seeded drivers will be in the 2004 London-Sydney?

Also it allows more events World Championship status.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 12 Mar 2003, 10:27 (Ref:533654)   #6
Radisichrox
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
New York
Posts: 1,424
Radisichrox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Interesting idea...
Radisichrox is offline  
__________________
Super Touring for life
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1996 Autosport dereklola Historic Racing Today 11 6 Aug 2004 20:28
Is it better now or in 1996 Woody75 Australasian Touring Cars. 73 5 Aug 2004 00:13
Suzuka 1996 Yoong Montoya Formula One 33 19 Nov 2002 11:21
1996--the beginning or the end of a Era?? kmchow Touring Car Racing 2 17 Aug 2002 13:50
the Rat in 1996 Radisichrox Touring Car Racing 2 6 Aug 2001 19:46


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.