Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 Dec 2001, 17:42 (Ref:184332)   #1
renaultbel
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Leuven-Belguim
Posts: 204
renaultbel should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Prost going to use the same tactic like Ferrari "starting with the old car"

According to recent reports Prost will begin their 2002 campaign using last year's car following their announcement that the company has gone into receivership.
Their engine supply from Ferrari could also be in doubt, speculation says, as neither side has confirmed that the two-year deal will continue next year.
Reuters has reported that Prost will not have access to the 2001 power plant because of the delays and instead will have to stick to the outdated 2000 engine. This is expected to be considerably cheaper than the $25 million the most up to date supply is thought to cost.
The team also faces the possibility of key staff leaving while they face such an uncertain future, leaving their technical department down on manpower once their problems are resolved.
renaultbel is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Dec 2001, 18:51 (Ref:184357)   #2
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
LOL, now Prost can't afford to design a new car, or pay for new engines. Come to think of it, I doubt they could afford to build a replacement car to 2001 spec if the old one got written off.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Dec 2001, 19:26 (Ref:184388)   #3
Kenny W.
Racer
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location:
Norway
Posts: 198
Kenny W. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
At least Minardi have someone to beat now
Kenny W. is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Dec 2001, 21:00 (Ref:184452)   #4
Nicholas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,953
Nicholas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Interesting to see the contrast between two teams using the same strategy...
Nicholas is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Dec 2001, 13:03 (Ref:184646)   #5
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Given that 2001 and 2002, the regulations differ very little, i think Prost would still be able to qualify within the 107% mark. They have one of the more reliable cars on the grid, and performance wise, the chassis needs some upgrading, but they'd do fine. (Arrows did that with 98,99)

I think Prost should just try to scrimp and save for next year, and pool 2 years resource into the 2003 campaign. Keep next year as a survival year.
Gt_R is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Dec 2001, 12:47 (Ref:184984)   #6
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It worked for Arrows, they used the '98 car in '99 and came out and built a very good car for 2000. Hopefully Prost can turn this current money problems around and survive.
racer69 is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Dec 2001, 21:52 (Ref:185192)   #7
Nicholas
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,953
Nicholas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Gt_R
Keep next year as a survival year.
Will Frentzen bother?
Nicholas is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Dec 2001, 09:31 (Ref:185370)   #8
Super Tourer
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Super Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
United Kingdom
East Anglia
Posts: 4,304
Super Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
You have to remember what point Prost is starting from, in that the 2001 car was truly awful, a direct comparison being the Sauber chassis powered by the same Ferrari engine....

If Prost even makes the grid, with qualifying times tumbling year on year, I believe there is a strong possibility that the cars may not
qualify within 107%. The reason is that with Ferrari and Williams pushing each other much harder next year and the tyre companies pushing development further - this directly effects teams like Prost, as the goalposts get moved further away.

The key point about the 107% rule is that is effectively implemented by teams at the front of the grid increasing the gap to the others. By starting with a 2000 engine (if at all) Prost will be even further handicapped. I they also end up with a couple of pay drivers without the neccesary speed this will only exacerbate the situation.
Super Tourer is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Dec 2001, 12:42 (Ref:185401)   #9
Maxmil
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United States
New England, USA
Posts: 778
Maxmil should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No Choice

Prost really had no choice but to use the old car. If the court had allowed them to incur the expense necessary to field a new car, the existing creditors would have quite rightly raised holy h**l. I can't believe that Prost can get through another season without a substantial, new, equity investor coming into the picture. This will probably mean that Alain, sadly, will lose control of his team.
Maxmil is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Dec 2001, 13:13 (Ref:185412)   #10
Vitesse
Veteran
 
Vitesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Bath, England
Posts: 791
Vitesse should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridVitesse should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: No Choice

Quote:
Originally posted by Maxmil
This will probably mean that Alain, sadly, will lose control of his team.
Did he ever have control in a real sense? Sadly, Prost joins the list of great drivers/lousy team bosses.

And, putting an historical spin on this, perhaps he was yet another victim of that peculiarly French obsession to have a national racing car ...
Vitesse is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Frank Williams fears "secret Ferrari advantage" Sodemo Formula One 45 11 Jan 2005 07:11
Jordan pulling a "Prost"?? Coach44 Formula One 14 31 Jan 2003 09:08
Ferrari starting 2002 in "old" car........... steve nielsen Formula One 14 16 Nov 2001 01:53
Alesi to Prost "Now Build Me A Car!" Liz Formula One 3 24 Sep 2000 12:23
Starting Tactic elan95 Formula One 3 25 Jul 2000 18:03


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.