|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
24 Feb 2004, 20:47 (Ref:884459) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,332
|
Imola Testing... Ferrari vs. Williams vs. Mac
Here are the times from today:
1 R.SCHUMACHER Williams 1m21.828s 2 M.SCHUMACHER Ferrari 1m21.918s 3 BARRICHELLO Ferrari 1m22.575s 4 COULTHARD McLaren 1m23.221s 5 PANIS Toyota 1m24.558s 6 DA MATTA Toyota 1m27.004s |
||
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!! |
24 Feb 2004, 20:54 (Ref:884464) | #2 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Barrichello was in an F2003GA, it's worth noting.
|
|
|
24 Feb 2004, 20:57 (Ref:884468) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,332
|
Yes, that's true. And judging by the pics on F1-Live, DC was really pushing hard... doesn't mean McLaren aren't sandbagging, I suppose, but at least we know he wasn't!!! There is a great picture of him locking up the right front, and another of him in opposite lock after hitting a curb a bit too hard. Good stuff.
|
||
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!! |
24 Feb 2004, 20:59 (Ref:884471) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
It doesn't smack of great confidence on the part of Ferrari - still running comparisons with last year's car, which from the pictures is fully last year's car with three element rear and two element front wings. There is clearly something that they have yet to understand about the new car - makes the races all the more exciting to look forward to.
|
|
|
24 Feb 2004, 21:05 (Ref:884478) | #5 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I think they were just trying out tyre compounds though.....although you're quite right, why not test with the new car?
|
|
|
24 Feb 2004, 21:18 (Ref:884492) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
Are Toyota really that far off the pace. I mean even MS was saying they were going to be a threat!
Testing makes it seem that RS will be WDC this year. We "know" JPM will not get the full backing of the team so RS will finally be champ... I think. |
||
__________________
Eventually we learn |
24 Feb 2004, 21:23 (Ref:884500) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Toyota have yet to get Imola right - I can't recall how they finished at that race last year, but I do remember news stories about how hard it is to get the car to hit all those braking areas and kerbs super hard but still be good round the rest of the circuit.
JPM will only lose out in the sense of not knowing about the technology being put into his car towards th end of the season - his engineers will still know the car, so I can't see tht being a problem. Williams won't let him under-perform anyy more than he will be inclined to take it easy. Ralf may well be on his way next year too anyway. |
|
|
24 Feb 2004, 22:06 (Ref:884554) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,409
|
Its still only testing, they are probably ALL sandbagging!
|
||
|
24 Feb 2004, 22:24 (Ref:884584) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,744
|
i love the fact we think teams and drivers can sandbag to 600ths of a second.
|
|
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
24 Feb 2004, 23:20 (Ref:884664) | #10 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Weather actually rendered the times relatively meaningless.
Not many laps were run and the session ended after rain and snow got worse. |
|
|
24 Feb 2004, 23:21 (Ref:884670) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
on pure numbers, last years ferrari is still faster then this years mclaren, and you can claim sandbagging i claim that they have lost there way and need to just toally re-evaluate where their program is
|
||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
25 Feb 2004, 00:28 (Ref:884732) | #12 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 342
|
the only thing I find interesting about testing is the reliability testing - its often proved at the start of the season that testing times really bare no comparison to their performance when it comes to the crunch.
and this 'amazing' Ferrari that was supposed to wipe the floor with the competition last yr? well it was much much closer than what was 'suggested' by looking at testing. Call me cynical Last edited by Nina; 25 Feb 2004 at 00:29. |
||
|
25 Feb 2004, 01:24 (Ref:884760) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,739
|
Testing, testing, testing, blah blah blah! God am I sick of all this speculation. Melbourne can't come quick enough.
|
||
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !" |
25 Feb 2004, 02:04 (Ref:884777) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,114
|
Interesting, Ferrari running F2004 with a radical new wing during the test at Imola.
http://www.autosport.com/newsitem.asp?id=26095&s=5 |
||
__________________
Montoya, what just happened? |
25 Feb 2004, 02:09 (Ref:884780) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Stop the fr*** rule changes, Moseley! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ferrari resurrgence at Imola? | Kirk | Formula One | 31 | 1 May 2006 12:18 |
Can Williams Perform at Imola | oziengineer | Formula One | 27 | 20 Apr 2004 23:44 |
What actually was illegal with the pre-Imola Williams 2001 rear diffuser? | Sodemo | Formula One | 14 | 23 Sep 2003 09:45 |
Williams in serious trouble in imola | DancingMachine | Formula One | 4 | 12 Apr 2001 13:34 |
How will Williams Go in Imola? | WilliamsBMWF1 | Formula One | 6 | 4 Apr 2001 13:56 |