Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Clubmans Rallycross Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Other Motorsports > Rallying & Rallycross

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Jul 2005, 17:57 (Ref:1364886)   #1
JLD
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
North Lincolshire
Posts: 218
JLD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
MSA want to ban the 6R4

taken from www.6r4.info
Quote:
The MSA will be given a propsal in September that effectively bans the 6r4 from single venue rallying from the beginning of 2006 and all National B events from 2007.

We cannot allow this to happen !

Stand by your beds, we need as much lobbying of the Rallies committee as possible. Please find out who your local representative is and give him/her the third degree.

Remember, if you dont do anything, these great cars will all be banned !!!!!!
JLD is offline  
__________________
reality - a state of mind brought on by alcohol deficiency
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 17:59 (Ref:1364889)   #2
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
What is the reasoning behind this proposal and who is making it?
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 19:37 (Ref:1364966)   #3
rdjones
Take That Fan
Veteran
 
rdjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
England
Leeds, Yorkshire
Posts: 9,126
rdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridrdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridrdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridrdjones should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Someone is having a laugh aren't they, sadly this is ture I have just been reading through the britishrally.co.uk forum and there is someone on the saying that they have spoken to someone for the MSA rallies commitee. It seems that the proposal is to ban WRC cars with active transmission and 6R4's among others from Nat B events from the end of this year, and from Nat A events from the end of 2006.
rdjones is offline  
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! !
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 19:41 (Ref:1364967)   #4
ASCII Man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
ASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridASCII Man should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
6r4?
Isn't that the MG Metro, which happens to be my all-time favourite rallycar?

Crazy!
ASCII Man is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 20:03 (Ref:1364982)   #5
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
This little nugget comes around every now and then doesnt it!
I see their point in that if you are going to enter a full blown WRC or 6R4 in a single venue it is clear you stand far more chance of winning.
But dont these people see that half the fun of going up against cars like that is that iof you beat them you can say to sponsors or press, "I beat a 100 grand car in my Mk2 Escort or GpN Lancer/Scooby"
I can see where they are coming from after seeing the likes of Pete Lloyd win rally after rally in quicker cars. But then he does put a lot into the sport and it is his business.
Mike Oates always gets my goat aswell! But as I say, if you can beat them then fair play to you.
6R4 banning is a bad idea though because there is now a failry well astablished cottage indusrty around to support the thing. Companies like Priceys place, TAL, and many others would be scuppered.
These whiners at MSA central should get out to a few rallies and see the smile cars like that put on peoples faces before making arbitrary decisions
chunder is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 20:22 (Ref:1365002)   #6
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I really can't see the issue if there is a sensible class structure in the sport. Not following it that closely, I don't know if there is...
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 20:24 (Ref:1365008)   #7
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Are the 6R4s still running to the same flimsy-plastic bathtub of fuel set-up that saw them banned from world rallying in the 80s.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 22:00 (Ref:1365084)   #8
peespeed
Racer
 
peespeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Ireland
Carlow, Ireland
Posts: 401
peespeed should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So if they are going to ban the WRC's and 6R4's will they ban the £60,000 Mk2 Escorts and the like. At the moment there are Mk2 Escorts and Darrians beating some of the WRC's on SV's so where's the problem or are the MSA trying to screw up British rallying again???
peespeed is offline  
__________________
now sitting snuggly on rxie's server :)
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2005, 22:39 (Ref:1365109)   #9
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by peespeed
So if they are going to ban the WRC's and 6R4's will they ban the £60,000 Mk2 Escorts and the like. At the moment there are Mk2 Escorts and Darrians beating some of the WRC's on SV's so where's the problem or are the MSA trying to screw up British rallying again???
Spot on Peter.

I believe that allowing bigger engined cars plus the bike engined cars there are no proper power output checks on these cars and this is what I think has fecked it all up, saying that what difference is there in not allowing these cars on SV events yet they are allowed on the National Tarmac championship?

Cars like the Burton Peugeot 306R4 then Cosworth, David Kynastons Audi A3, Paul Hartfields 306 V8 Audi device, the the 2.5 Metro's and the Millington Engined Escorts and Darrians are not policed properly when it comes to Power output.

But what is the "True" BHP of a WRC car?

If you ban one then ban them all I say
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2005, 00:09 (Ref:1365150)   #10
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/8...britain8kk.jpg

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/6...limits14oj.jpg
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jul 2005, 07:56 (Ref:1365312)   #11
BertMk2
Race Official
Veteran
 
BertMk2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Nr Maidstone, Kent
Posts: 10,329
BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!BertMk2 is going for a new world record!
We've competed at single venue events against WR cars, 6R4s, Darrians and various other fancy bits of kit - what's the problem? As far as I'm concerned it's great competing alongside them, we'll never beat them (unless they have problems) but then again we'll never beat lots of the 'lesser' machinery either. At club level surely it's all about just being there and having fun? And fun certainly covers watching and hearing 6R4s in full flight.

The 6R4 is an absolute classic and one of the iconic cars of British rallying - keep em running I say
BertMk2 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Aug 2005, 21:40 (Ref:1369684)   #12
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kicking-back
Are the 6R4s still running to the same flimsy-plastic bathtub of fuel set-up that saw them banned from world rallying in the 80s.
If you look closely at a 6R4 you will see it wasnt a "Flimsy bathtub" but a dam safe car if not the safest of the Group B cars that has steel box section with steel inner panels with only the box arches, hatch and bonnet that where lightweight
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Aug 2005, 21:46 (Ref:1369695)   #13
Mike_Wooshy
Veteran
 
Mike_Wooshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
England
Birmingham
Posts: 1,677
Mike_Wooshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMike_Wooshy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
britians attempts at group B cars were safe in there construction, I've got video evidence of the Rs200 with standing heavy impacts and keeping its general shape without crushin/folding up.
Mike_Wooshy is offline  
__________________
The race track and the human body, both born of the earth, drive to be one with the earth, and through the earth one with the car,
drive to the undiminished dream, single moments of pleasure, an eternity of memories.
Quote
Old 2 Aug 2005, 09:20 (Ref:1369943)   #14
EVO1X
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Ireland
IRELAND
Posts: 23
EVO1X should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ban the metro

MSA also are banning all car with acitive diffs and group B cars (Metro)from single venue rallys from 2006
EVO1X is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Aug 2005, 17:42 (Ref:1381474)   #15
DCS
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
Rozenburg ZH - Holland
Posts: 207
DCS should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Restrictors, limitations, regulations. I hate most of them, I hate the 300 bhp mark. That's probably the reason track days will be much bigger in the future and will attackt more and more crowd....
DCS is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Aug 2005, 17:28 (Ref:1383860)   #16
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kicking-back
Are the 6R4s still running to the same flimsy-plastic bathtub of fuel set-up that saw them banned from world rallying in the 80s.
wasnt the 6R4 about the safest of hte GpB cars with regards to fire as it wasnt running the loopy juice Turbo Fuels that the other cars ran?
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 16 Aug 2005, 23:02 (Ref:1384109)   #17
M.Lowe
Veteran
 
M.Lowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Teeside
Posts: 1,089
M.Lowe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It was the safest Group B car in construction and in the way the tanks where located
M.Lowe is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.