Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 Jan 2003, 08:58 (Ref:474840)   #1
Super Tourer
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Super Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
United Kingdom
East Anglia
Posts: 4,304
Super Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Mercedes to supply 2nd team in 2004?

Interesting article, any guesses of who the team might be?


From:www.pitpass.com


Mercedes to supply second team?
15-01-2003


Ahead of today's crucial meeting between FIA President Max Mosley and team bosses, aimed at rejuvenating F1™ as well as cutting costs, it's said that Mercedes has taken the initiative by stating that it would be willing to supply a second team in 2004.
According to a report in The Guardian the German manufacturer would be willing to supply a team, in addition to McLaren, with a fixed specification engine for around £6m - much less than some of the deals currently on offer from lesser manufacturers.

It's widely thought that Mosley will concentrate on the banning of all drivers aids, a move that will sit well with fans and many drivers but is sure to meet strict opposition from the bigger, more successful, teams.

At present it's planned that in 2004 teams will be limited to one engine per car at each Grand Prix, it's understood that Mosley is considering increasing this to two Grand Prix.

However this could in turn lead to costs escalating as the engine manufacturers look at ways to circumvent these new regulations.

As was seen in 2002 when the Honda was notoriously unreliable, this is bad PR for the engine manufacturers who are principally in F1™ to sell their road cars. Constant engine failure reflects badly on the manufacturer concerned therefore the engine builders will take whatever action necessary in order that their products are seen as reliable and successful, this could in turn lead to teams virtually re-building engines consistently during GP weekends.

Then again, the manufacturers could decide to simply quit F1™.
Super Tourer is offline  
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....'
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 09:23 (Ref:474858)   #2
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well that would be a good start, but I fear it's too little to late. Hopefully the meeting late today brings about some good resolutions.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 11:24 (Ref:474924)   #3
golem
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location:
Australia
Posts: 729
golem should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hmm... that IS an interesting piece of news. Wow. Good call Mercedes!!

Minardi-Mercedes... sounds good. ^_^
golem is offline  
__________________
Gawky supermodels may look stunning in the right clothes, on the right catwalk, in the right city, but in an M&S jumper, on a crowded street, on a wet Wednesday afternoon, only classic good looks will catch the eye. - Ian Eveleigh.
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 11:27 (Ref:474928)   #4
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yeah, well it sounds good, but Minardi-Ferrari and Prost-Ferrari have proved, a good engine doesnt gaurentee results.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 12:34 (Ref:474973)   #5
Russfeld
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
Russfeld should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
10mil for Merc? Thats the price for the F3 program right? Thats less than Minardi are paying for Cosworths!
Russfeld is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jan 2003, 11:38 (Ref:476091)   #6
bosch!
Veteran
 
bosch!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
New Zealand-Maori
GodZone
Posts: 531
bosch! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
sauber, belated pay off for Kimi
bosch! is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jan 2003, 13:21 (Ref:476185)   #7
JonesF1
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Posts: 459
JonesF1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I wouldnt pay $10 much less $6 million for the current engine. Merc better get their act together if they want to sell engines.
JonesF1 is offline  
__________________
"What's the point? We have no power. Are we going to put 'Loser' on the sidepod for a sponsor?" - John Menard
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2003, 18:16 (Ref:478336)   #8
Minardi4eva
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
Minardi HQ
Posts: 76
Minardi4eva should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Minardi+2002 McLaren Engine+Marques+Wilson?=A TOP 8 Season

nuff said
Minardi4eva is offline  
__________________
If you know a Brazilian with spiky black and gold hair and wearing a black and white Minardi suit in the Curtiba area,congratulations-you found my best friend
Quote
Old 20 Jan 2003, 18:02 (Ref:480213)   #9
racingdick
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Swansea... 200miles to Donny and Brands,
Posts: 1,389
racingdick should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
wouldn't be suprised if sauber link up with the merc engine again
racingdick is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jan 2003, 02:55 (Ref:480729)   #10
GTV27
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 706
GTV27 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Would Sauber swap Ferarri for Mercedes? Based on current performance...why? Cosworth users could be interested from a cost perspective.

Nevertheless, a good move on Merc's part.
GTV27 is offline  
__________________
"If a man could be crossed with a cat, it would improve the man but deteriorate the cat."
Mark Twain
Quote
Old 21 Jan 2003, 05:31 (Ref:480768)   #11
senna12
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location:
langley, british columbia
Posts: 1,565
senna12 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by GTV27
Would Sauber swap Ferarri for Mercedes? Based on current performance...why? Cosworth users could be interested from a cost perspective.
So might Sauber. I believe they pay a lot more than 6 million pounds for Ferrari's. Perhaps they would also be guaranteed a current spec unit, as opposed to year old ones, or whatever is meant by a "fixed spec" engine.
senna12 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BMW to supply second team in 2006? luke Formula One 32 1 Jan 2005 00:26
Cosworth Engine Supply details for 2004 Super Tourer Formula One 12 23 Dec 2003 19:01
Team Nasamax & 2004 Tim Northcutt Sportscar & GT Racing 10 26 Jun 2003 18:26
Jordan-Mercedes 2004? cos Formula One 7 15 Jun 2003 15:39
Single engine supply proposed for 2004 mortda Formula One 18 6 Jan 2003 19:11


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.