|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
20 Jan 2005, 16:33 (Ref:1205765) | #1 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
MSV's plans for Snetterton
http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/news/...A26%3A45%3A663
Plans for a residential school and hotel are on the wish list of former Formula 1 ace Jonathan Palmer, who is the driving force behind the MotorSport Vision (msv) company, which took over the track a year ago. As it sits on the grid for a second year, the company unveiled plans for £500,000-worth of improvements – double the amount spent in the first year. He said MSV was confident that Snetterton, like Norfolk and Norwich, was "on the up" and the operators were determined to make it one of the nation's top five circuits – rather than being considered a "scruffy track in the sticks". This looks good, a gradual upgrade of the circuit and additions to it like a hotel and a race school will spread the income and make it more viable, particularly now access to the circuit is vastly improved by the dual carriageway. The area is growing at a fast pace and although unthinkable even 5 years ago, a hotel and conference facility there would be pretty busy IMO. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
20 Jan 2005, 17:13 (Ref:1205785) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
The dual carriageway would be so much better if you didn't get the traffic throught the woods
|
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
20 Jan 2005, 17:32 (Ref:1205802) | #3 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,700
|
I agree with you ST, this looks to be very promising. No indications of a change to the circuit layout too, which is very good news after rumours I heard late last year. Just gradual improvements from a facility point of view. Let's hope it does work at increasing the spectator numbers too - the intent is certainly there!
|
||
__________________
DDMC Rescue Crew, Post Chief & Flag Marshal |
20 Jan 2005, 19:13 (Ref:1205854) | #4 | |||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Quote:
I believe we will see the remaining stretch (Elvedon to Barton Mills) dualled before too long. The immediate benefit is actually getting into the circuit without having to 'play chicken' across the opposing carriageway! As a 'local' I can testify that the area in general is growing at such a pace, that an increased facility at Snett can only benefit both ways of the equation. Last edited by Super Tourer; 20 Jan 2005 at 19:16. |
|||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
20 Jan 2005, 19:44 (Ref:1205861) | #5 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Good to see this happening.
Jonathan Palmer's putting his money where his mouth is. He seems to be very good news for British motorsport |
|
|
20 Jan 2005, 19:51 (Ref:1205865) | #6 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 49
|
I have not been a regular to Snett since the demise of the Champion of Snetterton FF1600 (mainly work commitments). But I have noticed a steady decline in facilities for spectators. Hats off to JP, Snett is a fab circuit and should be protected. I hope its not all talk we have nearly lost the circuit a few times.
|
||
|
20 Jan 2005, 21:39 (Ref:1205922) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
As I understand it, the land either side of the A11 between Barton Mills and Thetford, belongs in the main to a certain Lord Melchet (not the one from Blackadder fame), and he's a little bit of a green campaigner and tree hugger. As you may (or may not) have noticed, there are a few trees on that stretch of road. I seem to remember him saying things like "over my dead body", in relation to widening of the A11 through his estate.
There have been a number of plans for widening & dualling the A11 along that section. One good start would be to ban all holiday caravans on that section during the weekend of race meetings, and supermarket lorries too. (tee hee hee!) I look forward to seeing the improvements at the circuit and applaud JP for his forward vision. The medicine may be bitter at first, but it's in the interest of the sport, then the end quite often justifies the means. Circuit improvements: Erecting a wind break to the east/north east would be a another start. Please don't fill in the bomb hole! Can we have the old Norwich straight back. They don't really need to have a market on it, do they? New grandstand at Russell please - on the outside, with a bridge to get to it, then the punters in it can see most of the circuit. Power points in the paddock for us competitor types. Rob. |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
20 Jan 2005, 23:22 (Ref:1205985) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,985
|
I'll second the idea of a footbridge over the start/finish straight. You can walk across the track between races but that doesn't help much during the 2CV 24hrs.
|
|
|
21 Jan 2005, 01:06 (Ref:1206035) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 237
|
I heard a few rumours last year about the circuit. New grandstands, spectators at Seer and a new track layout but the hotel is new. Whatever JP does I'm sure it will be good for the circuit and motorsport.
I also remember a few years ago, just before Nicola sold BHL that Norfolk council and local motorsport businesses wanted to make the area a centre of excellence for national and cub motorsport; just as Northampton/Oxfordshire area is for F1. It would be great if the council resurected the idea now with JP at the helm. It really would put Snetterton on the map and probably bring back the glory days of the Jim Russell era to the circuit. Steve B |
||
|
21 Jan 2005, 13:16 (Ref:1206369) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,748
|
If the various rumours are true, it should be good for Snetterton. I've always been a big fan of the circuit, while my dad is of the opinion that it ain't that great. But there is actually a lot of good viewing points, aswell as the traditional Russell, it's just a bit of a walk getting to them. On club days, or tests, it's easy enough to hop in the car and drive round, but you can't do that for busier events.
Some grandstands, viewing at Sear etc., would be great, perhaps putting in some sort of banking at the Esses aswell? It's a great couple of corners, but on a busy day you can't go more than a couple of people deep, because of the flatness. |
||
__________________
Renault/MSA Young Photographer of the Year 2006 |
21 Jan 2005, 13:33 (Ref:1206393) | #11 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,681
|
Sounds great news. Now all they need to do is can the market.
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
22 Jan 2005, 23:11 (Ref:1207452) | #12 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
I take it you mean the inside of Esses. Banking would be pointless there. I dont know when you were last at Snet but there is banking on the outside now just past the bridge behind the brick flag point. From there you can get a great view all the way to Russell. Steve B |
|||
|
23 Jan 2005, 10:10 (Ref:1207719) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,601
|
Quote:
What is really needed there is a tunnel, like the one at Thruxton. |
||
|
23 Jan 2005, 10:42 (Ref:1207733) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,985
|
Do you mean a pedestrian tunnel like Donington or a full truck-sized tunnel like Thruxton? Can't see the need to get vehicles accross. A tunnel would make wheelchair access easier though.
As long as I can get from one side of teh track to the other I'm happy either way. |
|
|
23 Jan 2005, 10:48 (Ref:1207739) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,601
|
I was thinking more of the Thruxton pedestrian tunnel - clearly you don't need a vehicle tunnel as there is a perfectly good service road around the circuit already.
I'm not a fan of Donington's tunnel - the ceiling is too low. |
|
|
23 Jan 2005, 11:17 (Ref:1207769) | #16 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,840
|
A spectator bridge from the paddock across to the other side of the start straight would be great. There always was one in the 50s/60s/70s until a fierce storm destroyed it. Goodwood style pits with viewing balcony above would also be good - again like Snett of old.
But the biggest improvement of all for me would be to move the assembly area to the other end of the pits, next to Parc Ferme, to allow the old Russell (almost flat) corner to be re-instated. Removing the assembly area would allow for modern run-off. There is plenty of space up towards Riches for a new assembly area. Every driver who drove the old Russell would agree it was awesome - a big deep breath before turn in. The new Russell is hideously slow and seems to spoil the flow. When Russell was first put in place in '65 to slow the cars before the pits it too was a very tight corner, tighter infact than the Russell now. But the powers that be saw sense quickly and made it much faster. Why can't they do this now? |
||
|
23 Jan 2005, 13:39 (Ref:1207854) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,748
|
Quote:
A tunnel under the track would be good though. Too many bridges and things clutter things up. |
|||
__________________
Renault/MSA Young Photographer of the Year 2006 |
24 Jan 2005, 19:10 (Ref:1208825) | #18 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
All the positive news coming out of Palmer's circuits is marvellous.
Bear in mind the alternative was John Bachelor buying them :| |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Snetterton track plans | Peter Horsman | Racers Forum | 2 | 14 Oct 2005 07:44 |
TDI and Our plans! | Cryos | Rallying & Rallycross | 8 | 9 Mar 2005 21:41 |
Plans for next season | Tracey | Marshals Forum | 44 | 7 Jan 2005 15:14 |
Larbre's plans for 05 | tblincoe | Sportscar & GT Racing | 17 | 5 Dec 2004 17:13 |
Nasamax Plans | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 2 | 24 May 2004 21:33 |