|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Apr 2012, 18:44 (Ref:3064426) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
Lotus drop two cars.
Bryan Herta Autosport and Dreyer & Reinbold Racing will need to find new engines for Indianapolis.
http://www.indystar.com/article/2012...107/120423034/ |
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
23 Apr 2012, 20:20 (Ref:3064483) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Any surprise there?
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
23 Apr 2012, 21:51 (Ref:3064533) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
24 Apr 2012, 10:05 (Ref:3064761) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,223
|
I think it's more a case of DRR/BHA dropping Lotus than the other way round.
|
|
|
24 Apr 2012, 10:21 (Ref:3064770) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
Good to see Chevy and Honda picking an engine lease for each of these teams
|
||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
24 Apr 2012, 10:26 (Ref:3064775) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
Servia and Tagliani will be competitive at Indy, which may be the reason for this switch. This will free up Lotus engines for Shank and maybe Newman/Hass.
|
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
24 Apr 2012, 10:37 (Ref:3064781) | #7 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,529
|
The logical question might be whether the Lotus 'experience' actually supplies anyone at Indy... the Genii ownership thingumy seems up in the air still..
Can Mr Bourdais be competitive at the Indy 500 with a Lotus engine? |
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
24 Apr 2012, 11:19 (Ref:3064803) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
||
|
24 Apr 2012, 11:21 (Ref:3064804) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
No, especially when you consider he wasn't all that great when he was there before when he had a competitive package.
|
|
|
24 Apr 2012, 11:28 (Ref:3064806) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,223
|
||
|
24 Apr 2012, 11:30 (Ref:3064807) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 551
|
|||
|
24 Apr 2012, 16:24 (Ref:3064997) | #12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,107
|
If Shank Racing turns up with a Lotus engine, it should be clear who dropped who.
However, who would want to buy a road car from them after this debacle? Isn't it rather likely they completely pull out of the series for next year? And how long might the new engine lease for DRR and BHA last? Just Indy and then it's back to the old Lotus maybe? |
|
|
24 Apr 2012, 17:21 (Ref:3065024) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,311
|
There's been lots of previous years where an engine wasn't competitive to start but eventually recovers to become competitive if not dominant.
I think its far too early to write Lotus out, although I don't expect much from this season. I thought there was also going to be 1 or 2 points in the season where engines could be modified to provide "equalization"? |
||
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund |
24 Apr 2012, 18:10 (Ref:3065051) | #14 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 377
|
||
|
24 Apr 2012, 18:20 (Ref:3065058) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
24 Apr 2012, 23:52 (Ref:3065217) | #16 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 196
|
I have a source in the media who has been in touch with BHA and Lotus.
And this whole situation reeks to high heaven. Let's start with the Lotus press release, which I've shared in my Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/open?id=1vFg...I_LEm-gb0Pd4oB The first thing is the spin that Lotus is putting on this, namely that they dropped BHA & DRR, not the other way around. It is widely speculated that there were at least threats of legal action against Lotus from those two teams citing "breach of contract". Unfortunately, the deal is done and it's unlikely that we'll ever know how BHA and/or DRR feel the contract was breached by Lotus. My source has been in contact with Olivier Picquenot, Manager of IndyCar racing at Lotus. He states, "The tests organise by Indycar or private test are not mandatory and we want to do it, the addition of two cars end of February change completely our plan of engines pool and make difficult the start of the season for us, our technical partner EDL and the teams." This also sounds like "spin", although I think it smells more like a cow patty. The teams were all originally have their engine contracts done late last year, as I recall, yet there were still teams without engine deals going into testing. The teams that were confirmed with Lotus engines in mid-Feb were: - HVM (1 car) - BHA (1 car) - DRR (1 car) Shank wasn't confirmed, as they were still trying to put funding together. So the cars putting the strain on Lotus could only be Dragon. We all know how late Bourdais got his motor. That may be partly due to finding funding for Bourdais' ride, but may also be related to Lotus' financial issues. So why is it that two more engines for Lotus is a strain while two more at Honda or Chevy is business as usual? The short answer is money. There is reason to believe that the legal issues that Lotus has been dealing with have resulted in their inability to pay Judd during development of the motor. Judd needed to make a business decision, and they stopped development until they got paid. It doesn't make good business sense to have lots of manpower spending lots of time developing a motor that may or may not wind up in a car on a race track, so Judd stopped working on it. When Lotus paid Judd, development resumed, but they were behind the curve, and that shows in the on-track performance of the Lotus cars. This has more twists and turns than the first season of 24, I tell ya! Now, I have also heard that the lack of power for the Lotus motors can be attributed (at least in part) to a temperature safety system that not only limits the power, but will also kill the motor if it reaches a certain temperature. The idea of saving the motors so they will run the distance required by IndyCar's rulebook makes sense, but it cost too much in the way of horsepower. Although I think this was more a matter of making sure the Lotus teams had working motors, as they were (and apparently still are!) in short supply. Going into SaoPaulo and then Indianapolis, Lotus suddenly has more engines to work with, so they may be able to remove the temp safety system. In theory, this should improve the power of the Lotus cars, but nobody knows by how much. The other thing is the availability of Lotus motors... Will there be teams that take a stab at running Indy with a Lotus lump? It would lead to a larger car count, sure. But it also adds the potential for a full-season driver getting bumped from the 500. I'm sure Lotus would hate for Simona to sit out on Memorial Day, since she is Lotus' flagship driver. Add in the drama of her accident at Indy last year and making the show in PorkChop with burns on her hands, and you've got a hell of a story! And what of the teams that are sticking with Lotus instead of jumping ship, specifically Dragon? Bourdais has wrung the most out of that motor and had a couple of brilliant drives. I'm sure Lotus wants to see their black/gold livery running 'round The Brickyard. Don't know about Legge, though. We know Shank wants to field a driver. So does Newman-Haas. Last edited by mythoughtsareracing; 24 Apr 2012 at 23:57. |
||
__________________
speed - noun 1. rapidity in moving, going, traveling, proceeding, or performing; swiftness; celerity 2. a north American television network that failed because it lots touch with fans. |
25 Apr 2012, 02:52 (Ref:3065229) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
26 Apr 2012, 10:51 (Ref:3065721) | #18 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Anyone with media access to teams, manufacturers, and PR outlets related to IndyCar would get the same. And lets be honest, it's not hard to get media access to these groups. |
|||
__________________
speed - noun 1. rapidity in moving, going, traveling, proceeding, or performing; swiftness; celerity 2. a north American television network that failed because it lots touch with fans. |
26 Apr 2012, 14:13 (Ref:3065819) | #19 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
Bourdais/Servia/Tagliani Sorry to Simona and Katherine, but those 3 are better than each of you. In Simona's case she's kinda marketable as a female driver, the fans respect her due to her past efforts and knowing she's in a crap car, and per Cavin Tuesday night, HVM are the one Lotus team 100% fully on board with them. Legge gets added on because she's Bourdais' teammate and Jay Penske would say all or nothing (and Jay Penske may have done the same thing of wanting out, although that means Bourdais loses his sponsorship if they're receiving any money for having Lotus on the sidepod). The whole thing goes back to how people want technical diversity in grids but fail to realize that if you're a team with a driver and sponsorship, with the level of money we're talking about here, you're not going to handicap yourself with an inferior car and engine intentionally unless you're desperate or have no better offers. It's a bit like the tires in sportscar racing for a number of years. Everyone knew Michelin was far and away superior, and the rest of the grid that had Dunlops or whatever, it wasn't because they were trying to develop an alternative or received any money there, it was because Michelin chose not to supply them. Jay Penske's team could be in that position now with engines. Shank fielding Howard at Indy seems more likely than ever as Lotus needs the bullets. The one bit of this that does not make any sense is Newman/Haas, unless Carl is letting all these teams suffer and work out the bugs and then he swoops in to become the "Factory Lotus" team in 2013 or 2014 and profit off all these teams' labor. Quote:
Last edited by Flyin Ryan; 26 Apr 2012 at 14:19. |
||||
|
26 Apr 2012, 23:18 (Ref:3065981) | #20 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Lotus didn't make the decision to "cull the herd". The teams made the choice. It's some serious spin on Lotus' part to appear like they've done nothing wrong. It seems apparent that the teams that are moving away from Lotus also have a bit more in the bank to press the issue. I've heard reports that BHA, at least, is paying off the Lotus lease (all or in part, depending on who you believe) as well as paying full fare on a Honda lease. Quote:
|
||||
__________________
speed - noun 1. rapidity in moving, going, traveling, proceeding, or performing; swiftness; celerity 2. a north American television network that failed because it lots touch with fans. |
27 Apr 2012, 10:06 (Ref:3066078) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,107
|
No, I don't want to buy any car at all but Lotus must have at least some kind of a point for engaging themselves in motorsport. That's selling road cars isn't it?
|
|
|
27 Apr 2012, 16:24 (Ref:3066232) | #22 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
7 May 2012, 15:59 (Ref:3070716) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
Looks like two more Lotus cars set for the chop:
http://www.indystar.com/article/2012...IndyStar.com|s If this goes ahead, that'll leave HVM as the only regular Lotus on the grid, with perhaps one more for Jean Alesi at Indy (Fan Force United). Last edited by Down F0rce; 7 May 2012 at 16:16. |
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
7 May 2012, 16:06 (Ref:3070719) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,311
|
According to Cavin's story, Dragon is suing Lotus for breach of Contract
http://www.indystar.com/article/2012...ne-maker-Lotus |
||
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund |
8 May 2012, 06:50 (Ref:3070984) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Quote:
If they do, I think IndyCar must find an engine supplier for next year... Maybe Volkswagen, Mercedes, or even Fiat will take the third spot. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lotus LMP2, and 2 Lotus GT2's? | gucom | Sportscar & GT Racing | 635 | 20 Feb 2015 20:05 |
[Team] Team Lotus ends sponsorship deal with Group Lotus | Marbot | Formula One | 101 | 17 Jul 2012 21:40 |
[Team] Team Lotus to confirm name and Renault bits but Grp Lotus start Norfolk Civil War? | duke_toaster | Formula One | 255 | 23 Nov 2010 02:52 |
[Team] BBC : Renault lumps for Lotus next year, "Team Lotus" may return | duke_toaster | Formula One | 66 | 17 Sep 2010 20:50 |