|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
3 Feb 2005, 15:35 (Ref:1216621) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
Renault
Itv has reported that teams are impressed with the pace of the renaults. I know its just testing but its really interesting to see their pace. I think Ferrari are having issues. The ugly front wing suggests to me they are getting a little desperate for grip... I know nothing...
Anyway, BAR seems to be struggling while Renault may have found the answer. They actually seem like a real threat to the title if testing is any indication. |
||
__________________
Eventually we learn |
3 Feb 2005, 15:44 (Ref:1216625) | #2 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 203
|
You might want to look at the 'Testing from Valencia 02/02/05' thread.
|
|
|
3 Feb 2005, 15:52 (Ref:1216629) | #3 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Ferrari's pace is pretty good for an iterim car - the F2004M was only 3 tenths slower than set in the 2004 spec car. I think maximise grip is probably Ferrari's definition!
They are all looking to claw back grip, particularly the amount lost with the reduced diffuser, so I'm sure we will plenty of sproutings on the cars before we hit Melbourne and during the year. It was great pace from Renault and it seems they were only longish stints as well. The only rider is that Valencia is well known for producing good performances that aren't able to be replicated elsewhere. Think back 12 months, DC was setting fast times around Valencia in the McLaren that proved to be so wayward at other tracks, similarly see the Sauber thread - they were quick at Valencia and then found themselves in all sorts of trouble at Barcelona. As you say, testing is hard to evaluate - certainly 1st practice at Melbourne is going to be very keenly awaited by us and nervously anticipated by the teams. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
3 Feb 2005, 17:09 (Ref:1216698) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
Good points ST
Overall renault shouldn't be underestimated. Every year, pre-season ,they say they have improved (compared to others) and are one of the few teams that can say this without it being PR bullspit |
||
|
3 Feb 2005, 20:15 (Ref:1216843) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 772
|
Quote:
I agree, though: ugly most of the time doesn't mean fast while slick and beautiful does. But: who says that Ferrari MUST be the fastest car again? Sure, they have been since 99 and I am quite happy about this, but it is not a god given that they always will be. |
|||
|
3 Feb 2005, 20:20 (Ref:1216849) | #6 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Indeed it is not a given although many people (Sir Frank Williams included) believe that Ferrari will indeed produce another clever design.
Hopefully it will prove to be much closer than last year, and on face value the cars seems to be faster than the new regs suggested they might be. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
3 Feb 2005, 20:21 (Ref:1216851) | #7 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,181
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"And the most important thing is that we, the Vettels, the Bernies, whoever, should not destroy our own sport by making stupid comments about the ******* noise." - Niki Lauda |
4 Feb 2005, 02:08 (Ref:1217069) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,473
|
I remember this time last year, someone from Williams saying Renault could be title contenders... and two months prior to that, everyone was talking up McLaren's chances.
Sadly I can't see past Ferrari & Schumi again for 2005. To be honest I'm looking forward to the Champ Car, Moto GP and IRL seasons a lot more. I shall watch Oz live, and hope it pleasantly surprises, but i won't get my hopes up. |
|
|
4 Feb 2005, 02:18 (Ref:1217077) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,927
|
Renault have improved in leaps and bounds over the last 3 years and I can see that happening yet again. Not quite enough for 1st place in either of the championships, but they aren't too far away. Flav just has to make sure that Fernando doesn't get poached by Ferrari, although he pretty much controls that being Fernando's pimp...er manager.
|
||
__________________
Part time wingman, full time spud. |
4 Feb 2005, 06:45 (Ref:1217166) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
The only thing that REALLY worries me about renault is wether they'll gradually get lost with chassis settup.
Last year they either deliberately made the car understeer as part of a great settup for getaways..or they are making dodgey choices now that MG is gone. I would like to think it's all well planned and they completely know what they are doing.Maybe we'll find out for sure this year? |
||
|
4 Feb 2005, 09:15 (Ref:1217247) | #11 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Thats a good point RWC - perhaps we tend to forget that much of Ferrari's success is down to team performance over the entire season.
Not only is their car development always spot on, their strategy calls are excellent and you rarely (although on occasion) see a botched pit stop. Other teams often start with great promise, then drop the ball. BAR faded mid-season last year, Renault had a blank patch as well. Aside from developing a car and engine to rival Ferrari, you have to develop the entire team to another level as well. IMO. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
4 Feb 2005, 10:20 (Ref:1217292) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Which obviously after 5 years of learning, no one seem to master it yet
|
||
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to." |
4 Feb 2005, 11:34 (Ref:1217331) | #13 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 233
|
The R25 looks to be a fine car; recording impressive times over long runs.
Just looked this up: http://www.planet-f1.com/news/story_18573.shtml |
||
|