|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 May 2004, 06:50 (Ref:972090) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,084
|
Buying a Camera
Im an amateur photographer looking to buy my first camera in about six months. I dont want to spend any more than $1K AUD on it.
At present, I like the fujifilm finepix 6.0. what should I look for? |
||
|
16 May 2004, 07:20 (Ref:972105) | #2 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
A shop that sells the fujifilm finepix 6.0.
sorry, but you did ask |
||
|
16 May 2004, 12:50 (Ref:972498) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
I cant seem to find the camera that you are refering to?
google search gives me Fujifilm FinePix F700, but only because it is a 6 megapixel camera? i take it you are looking at a digital camera? |
||
__________________
Local Track: Aldo Scribante What sort of motorist are you... Smooth or Hairy I'm definitely hairy. |
17 May 2004, 06:38 (Ref:972991) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,084
|
Yeah, that sounds right.
|
||
|
17 May 2004, 08:20 (Ref:973055) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,525
|
I would guess your talking about one of these;
F700 S5000 S7000 I have just bought the S5000, lovely peice of kit Last edited by Duffacus; 17 May 2004 at 08:27. |
||
__________________
Interviewer: The strategy, have you got any tortoises, any hares in the Jaguar team? Brundle: Didn’t see too many in practice |
17 May 2004, 13:18 (Ref:973322) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,084
|
Yep, the S5000 is what I'm after.
How is it treating you? |
||
|
18 May 2004, 02:03 (Ref:973976) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,010
|
I own a Sony DSC-717...very happy with it.
heres my galleries (the first two taken with the sony) http://www.pbase.com/billnchristy |
||
|
18 May 2004, 07:22 (Ref:974057) | #8 | ||
Take That Fan
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,122
|
I have S602 which does the job pretty well. That has now been replaced by the S7000, which is a really nice bit of kit and bloke at work has one. IMO would spend the extra £150ish and get the S7000, as I think that it is a better camara and better suited to for Motor Sport pictures.
|
||
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! ! |
18 May 2004, 09:47 (Ref:974153) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,525
|
I haven't used the S5000 at a meeting yet but I have been practicing on it, our garden gets lots of birds in it because my parents feed them so they are what I have been practicing on! I had it on maz zoom on some photos and the quality is still excellent! It looses none of its quality what so ever. I've been very happy with it so far, I think either a S5000 or S7000 would suit you fine.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: The strategy, have you got any tortoises, any hares in the Jaguar team? Brundle: Didn’t see too many in practice |
18 May 2004, 10:16 (Ref:974173) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
Quote:
Does anyone have/or think it is worth it getting the addon lense for telephoto? Pitty the S7000 doesnt have the 10X of the S5000. Also rdjones? have you got any motorsport pics from your S7000 for me to look at? Getting back to your question pplater, I considered the S5000 but IMO the 3megapixel is not a worthy upgrade from my 2 megapixel camera But still even my 2800Z gets great pics so the S5000 will deffinately be good value for money! |
|||
__________________
Local Track: Aldo Scribante What sort of motorist are you... Smooth or Hairy I'm definitely hairy. |
18 May 2004, 18:31 (Ref:974663) | #11 | |||
Take That Fan
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,122
|
Quote:
As I say the chap at work does have a S7000 and guess what he uses it for Motor Sport Photography. Sadly he has closed his website so I can't show u any pictures. Now we had chatted about them and we are both in agreement that you can't tell the difference between that and a DSLR, in he has even had one of the photos he has taken with it published in Motorsport News. The other thing to remember the is that the S7000 has now been improved on too. Fuji have now brought out the S20 Now I havn't had a look at one these but if it is anything like the S602/7000 then it will do job. Last edited by rdjones; 18 May 2004 at 18:33. |
|||
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! ! |
18 May 2004, 19:09 (Ref:974693) | #12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 656
|
This is off topic given pplater's stated budget, but i feel i should point out that there is a world of difference between a DSLR and either the S602 or the S7000.
|
|
|
18 May 2004, 19:22 (Ref:974703) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
True I dont think you could compare a DSLR with a Prosumer camera. But I also do think in a amateur's hands (such as myself, beginner even!) a DSLR will be useless.
IMO the S5000 looks like a great camera! only negative for me is the 3megapixel. I also dont quite understand the idea behind the S20? This seems to be the sam body as the S7000 but only a 3megapixel sensor? Can anyone explain the logic behind that? |
||
__________________
Local Track: Aldo Scribante What sort of motorist are you... Smooth or Hairy I'm definitely hairy. |
18 May 2004, 19:29 (Ref:974708) | #14 | ||
Take That Fan
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,122
|
|||
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! ! |
18 May 2004, 19:53 (Ref:974732) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 656
|
Cougar21 (and pplater), it might be worth looking at some of the other long zoom cameras - the Minolta Dimage Z2, and the Kodak 6490 chief among them.
The Minolta has a faster lens (in terms of aperture - better for low light and focusing) and a quicker shutter response (useful for catching fast subjects). The Kodak just seems to be an excellent little camera, although i don't know how good it is for motorsport. Have a look on the American site, http://www.photographyreview.com/reviewscrx.aspx - a very usful place for opinions. |
|
|
24 May 2004, 17:57 (Ref:981611) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,525
|
Well the S5000 got me some great results on photos at Oulton Park, very sharp and high quality, I would recommend the S5000 to anyone.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: The strategy, have you got any tortoises, any hares in the Jaguar team? Brundle: Didn’t see too many in practice |
26 May 2004, 18:01 (Ref:984191) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 504
|
I was surprised at the price of the S5000, especially when I saw the quality of your photos Duffacus, it seems fantastic value.
|
|
|
26 May 2004, 18:53 (Ref:984250) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,525
|
Apparently the camera was in the £350 region around Christmas time but has since come down in price. I saw a few people with this camera at Silverstone for the BTCC races and when I decided to take another look into the camera it had come down in price so it was an offer I certainly couldn't miss. I bought it ready for Oulton and I was really pleased with the results. The camera really is fantastic value and the quality is very high.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: The strategy, have you got any tortoises, any hares in the Jaguar team? Brundle: Didn’t see too many in practice |
22 Jun 2004, 04:00 (Ref:1011609) | #19 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
I'm still learning, but the 10X zoom lens makes it easier to get decent shots from the spectator's perspective. Vintage Pics from Mid-Ohio My biggest gripe is that it uses a dock for a charger, which isn't the most compact arrangement to pack for the hotel room. -jde |
|||
__________________
J.D. Ellis |
22 Jun 2004, 16:43 (Ref:1012309) | #20 | ||
Take That Fan
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,122
|
I am now looking to upgrade from my S602 and I think it is time to go for a DSLR. I have had a look at a Nikon D70 and Canon D300 as these are both just within my price range but, IMO they just look at bit cheap. I would really like Canon D10 but I can't quite afford one
With this in mine I have had a look at 2nd hand prices and I have discovered that you can get a Canon D30 for about £450, Canon D60 for about £550 and a Nikon D100 for about £650. I am sure between now and the end of the season (when I planning to make the switch) that price will come down. But I am not sure which of three to go for has anyone got any thought. Last edited by rdjones; 22 Jun 2004 at 16:47. |
||
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! ! |
23 Jun 2004, 14:30 (Ref:1013418) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 656
|
The 300d (in my opinion, as i know plenty of people that love it) isn't worth the money. The D70 definitely is, so i wouldn't write it off at all for the construction.
Of the rest, the D100 is possibly the best constructed, but is still very expensive considering the D70, brand new, isn't too much more. The D60 has some significant improvements over the D30, but has some serious issues with parts supply should anything go wrong. The D30, by all accounts, is still a seriously good camera. In terms of features, it blows away the 300D. Don't get caught up too much with simply counting megapixels - the D30 is a direct predecessor of the utterly wonderful 10D and is still highly rated today. It's also seriously good value as a 2nd hand buy. My first choice (bear in mind that I'm a Canon loyalist ) would be the Nikon D70. After that, I think you'd be best served by a D30 and spend the difference on getting a better lens, as it's the photographer and the glass (in that order) that make the real difference as far as i'm concerned. |
|
|
23 Jun 2004, 15:40 (Ref:1013498) | #22 | ||
Take That Fan
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,122
|
Thanks for that. I have been speaking to a fellow forum member about this one last night and she also agreed that the D30 is the best of lot and having done a little bit more reseach into this subject last I am now in agreement with you.
As for the D70 as I have heard about 1 or 2 stories about people having problems. So this is putting me off, but a chap at work has just order one so I will have a look at his before writing it off completly. But I think it will be a D30, its just a case of finding one at the right price. Last edited by rdjones; 23 Jun 2004 at 15:43. |
||
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! ! |
23 Jun 2004, 18:52 (Ref:1013729) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Sounds like y'all have some really nice cameras! You wanna talk "amateur"? I just bought a standard, run-of-the-mill HP 3MP and I'm more than happy with it. Under $200. Certainly not meant for motorsport photography, but for how many races I actually get to attend, it fits my needs perfectly. (Mostly pictures of the kids).
|
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
23 Jun 2004, 20:04 (Ref:1013801) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 656
|
ok, although i do work for them occasionally, i would recommend Jessops second hand listings - www.jessops.com/used
D30s appear on there quite often and you can have an extensive look over it, as well as having a 12 month warranty. I don't think i'm too biased here as i couldn't really give a damn about the company's fortunes, just that the price is similar to buying privately only with some extra benefits. Happy hunting though! |
|
|
24 Jun 2004, 23:46 (Ref:1015384) | #25 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34
|
Well folks Last year I shot Moto X with a Fuji S602, quite a capable camera IMO. Wonderful camera for its price and probably the best for sports in the prosumer class, but it does take skill and photography knowledge to get the best out of all these cameras of this type. This year I have moved on to a Canon 10D and good L glass. Why Canon you ask? Very simple my friends, when you buy DSLR you are buying into a system not just a camera body and IMHO Canon has better glass and also a better selection. I also prefer the CMOS sensor. You buy the best lenses you can afford and then you can upgrade camera bodies as you grow into the system.
The Nikon D70 may very well be a better built camera then the Canon 300D, but where do you grow from D70? The inferior, but better built D100 or D1X or maybe the 4mp D2H? They don't even make a verticle battery grip for the D70. This is just my opinion BTW I am not Canon biased as I have used Pentax film cameras for many years and still prefer them for film. I just see Canon as the best future for what I want... |
||
__________________
Jeff tenHave PhotoGraphics |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying at auction | Nordic | Road Car Forum | 4 | 17 May 2004 20:36 |
after buying stewart why is the jag so cr@p | tanalised | Formula One | 8 | 31 Jul 2002 11:52 |
What games will you be buying with your PS2??? | Minardi fan | Virtual Racers | 1 | 26 Sep 2000 15:28 |
If you're buying a car | Ed-f1 | Formula One | 4 | 21 May 2000 00:59 |