|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
View Poll Results: Do you like the new lmp1´s | |||
Yes, they are lovely. | 16 | 34.78% | |
Yes, but they could be better. | 22 | 47.83% | |
No, they where better last year. | 0 | 0% | |
No, the proportions are killing them. | 8 | 17.39% | |
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
30 Mar 2014, 13:18 (Ref:3386584) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
FIA petition
Good day forum. People are not enjoying much the looks of the new LMP1´s. The fact that they are slimmer and have taller cockpits is the main issue. So I think there are many fans here and that we could in an organised form tell the FIA about our opinions. I already sent them a twitter saying that I disliked the fact that making them narrower does not make any sense (making them taller is for safety reasons mainly visibility). So I ask to anybody who has a twitter to tell them your opinion today or in a close period and to leave your opinion below and in the poll. Thank you
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 13:28 (Ref:3386588) | #2 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
And Fernando Rees from Aston Martin just marked my tweet as favorite. Come on gusy we must not stand with our arms crossed. No way we will let things get as ridiculous as with F1 where even Bernie said he hates the new V6 and Vettel said "they sound like ****".
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 13:39 (Ref:3386590) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 137
|
I don't find them that bad actually. I prefer the new Audi over the old one from last year, and they all are better than the original Peugeot 908. If they want to make them look nice and easy to see out of they could start with taking the roofs off, for me.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 13:41 (Ref:3386591) | #4 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 137
|
Also, if we really want to get them sexed up - no fins and normally aspirated petrol engines of 10 or 12 cylinders. But that's not going to happen, ever.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 14:01 (Ref:3386601) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,899
|
well i think they juST don't look as good as previous years IMHO
|
||
|
30 Mar 2014, 14:17 (Ref:3386605) | #6 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
But I haven´t made this thread to complain about the fins because they are there for a good reason. Cutting the withd of the cars and tires though is just silly.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 14:25 (Ref:3386607) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Can we all please stop pretending that petitions in motorsport have any relevance to the decision process?
Also, narrower cars - less frontal area - less drag - less power needed for the same lap time - less fuel - MORE EFFICIENCY. And that was the goal of the new LMP1 rules from the start. |
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
30 Mar 2014, 15:55 (Ref:3386655) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
(1)Lower the ride height
(2)full width rear wing , front wing element allowed . (3)open up engine rules . (4)Get rid of hybrid and other mad tech that is pricing privateer teams out of competing (5)Adjust the cockpit dimentions for a more p-leasing look (6) Reintroduce the carriage of a 5th wheel or mandated baggage room . (7) Get rid of that abortion of a fin (8) Integral design of pax seat of reasonable dimentions . Just my 2 pence ..... I voted for option 4 . |
||
|
30 Mar 2014, 16:36 (Ref:3386678) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Send your complaints to Ulrich & co. directly since they have sat in the commission/working group meetings too.
I was disappointed because 2014 was a chance to make even bigger chassis revamp, i.e. new underloor design (ground effect) and maybe that way making the fin redundant. If there even were such ideas I think the teams might have preferred to keep status quo anyway, as happened with F1... Audi is a bit awkward, Toyota is a bit... different at least but I think the Porsche is from certain angles the best looking LMP since Acura '08. Too bad the livery is a joke. Last edited by deggis; 30 Mar 2014 at 16:43. |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 18:15 (Ref:3386721) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,060
|
Literally an hour into the first race we'll all be used to them. I'm already used to them to be honest. Agree with deggis on his point about them missing an opportunity. But I think there are bigger things to worry about.
|
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23/'24 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
30 Mar 2014, 18:43 (Ref:3386737) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 932
|
Get rid of the wings and put the engines back in front!
Oops, wrong forum. |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 18:50 (Ref:3386743) | #12 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
||
|
30 Mar 2014, 19:26 (Ref:3386763) | #13 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,060
|
Last year's cars weren't even that low compared to a TS020 or a Bentley EXP.
Each to their own but I don't think it's a massive issue. |
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23/'24 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
30 Mar 2014, 19:39 (Ref:3386769) | #14 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,186
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
30 Mar 2014, 20:26 (Ref:3386789) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,884
|
I don't think they're ugly at all. If this year's race is close, then the next generation in 20 or 30 years' time will be bemoaning that the Le Mans cars don't look enough like a 919, or an R18.
If you really believe that strongly, go for it, but I won't sign it. There's more important things in life to put your name to. Enthusiast I may be, but in reality these cars are only something for my eyes to look at and my ears to hear, beer in hand, on one particular weekend in June. |
||
|
30 Mar 2014, 21:10 (Ref:3386808) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
We're looking at the most exciting sports car season that I care to remember, most likely the most diverse since 1999....so I really can't get myself to care about cars that are slightly narrower than last year.
Non-issue for me, sorry. |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 22:08 (Ref:3386832) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
The return of full width rear wing helps a lot with the new cars (or actually: iirc the max width of the car is still 10 centimetres wider than the wing but it doesn't make a big difference visually, if the cars are even built to the max width in the first place). The Toyota-invented extensions look ugly in comparison.
|
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 01:54 (Ref:3386896) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,703
|
if I were to change the LMP1 rules for esthetics...
o- I'd lower the front wheelarches, they shouldn't be so fat. o- Front noses should be much longer and lower, not vertical. o- Wheelbase should be much shorter. They're race cars, not limousines. o- Remove the fin, as long as it's safe. |
||
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed! by NaBUrean Prodooktionz naburu38.itch.io |
31 Mar 2014, 03:58 (Ref:3386918) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 824
|
I don't see what you guys are complaining about. I was at the Prologue and not for 1 second did I think " hey these cars are 10cm less wide then last years". They all look incredible and they look even beter moving. So please stop complaining about this non-issue and go see them in real life before slagging them off on the basis of seeing them on a screen.
|
||
|
31 Mar 2014, 07:38 (Ref:3386951) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,596
|
People can complain if they like. Its a big world with many differing opinions right? I like the new body rules for fenders behind the front wheels. They didnt need to make them have a higher roof height imo. Theres not a huge difference though. I think altering the seating position and the fender height was enough for visibility. Narrower cars arent my favorite but 10cm is the length of your index finger, so its not a big deal. I like them about as much as last year. Ideally Group C or late 90's GT1 would be my choice though
|
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 14:53 (Ref:3387079) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 953
|
We have three manufacturers, each committing two cars with completely different solutions to how to propel the most technologically advanced racing cars in the world forward. I'm in heaven personally, the regs are obviously working in at least some way.
|
||
|
31 Mar 2014, 16:02 (Ref:3387102) | #22 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 211
|
We will have a Petrol V4 Turbo Hybrid, Petrol V8 NA Hybrid, Diesel V6 Turbo Hybrid, Petrol V8 NA and Petrol V6 Turbo.
5 different LMP1 models and 5 different engines, just realise how special this is! Who cares about the looks of the cars? Ofcourse i prefer sexy looking cars, but these big differences are great. No "cup racing" like F1 but real technical freedom. |
||
|
31 Mar 2014, 17:30 (Ref:3387120) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,354
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
31 Mar 2014, 19:29 (Ref:3387164) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
Anything can be improved, but they look pretty good. Certainly good enough that the thought that people should throw away their new cars to build different ones is simply ridiculous.
|
|
__________________
When Henry Ford II wanted to kick Enzo Ferrari’s ass he did not instruct his minions to build a Formula 1 car. |
31 Mar 2014, 20:17 (Ref:3387177) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
Quote:
Let's just hope Lotus actually shows... |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Petition | Marcos WTF | Australasian Touring Cars. | 18 | 11 Dec 2013 06:07 |
Let us all send emails to FIA/Petition thread (merged) | Nismo | Formula One | 58 | 24 Jun 2005 08:42 |