Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 Oct 2005, 11:56 (Ref:1430640)   #1
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Panoz Gets 2007 Chassis Contract

The Indy Star reports that Panoz will be announced as the new Champ Car chassis builder for 2007, and that the package will have an additional 25 hp via the Cosworth engine (775 hp)...

Panoz said that they can deliver a quality chassis for less $$$ than Lola can, which was a big factor in the decision that will be announced at a news conference today...

BTW...the other series announced extensions of their existing agreements with Panoz and Dallara through 2006...and it was implied that they consented to let Panoz supply chassis to both series if they wish...

Where does that leave Carl Haas and Lola???
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 12:44 (Ref:1430683)   #2
josvandeperre
Veteran
 
josvandeperre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
England
Central London
Posts: 1,167
josvandeperre should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
One wonders (and hopes) that running effectively interchangeable cars in an effectively interchangeable pair of series in one territory might carry implications about reunification (at last) in 2007 or 08
josvandeperre is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 13:37 (Ref:1430720)   #3
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Perhaps in 2008 or 9 the series will be strong enough that they can let Lola compete with Panoz. If it's more expensive it would be up to the teams whether it was an advantage or not.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 11 Oct 2005, 13:39 (Ref:1430722)   #4
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by josvandeperre
One wonders (and hopes) that running effectively interchangeable cars in an effectively interchangeable pair of series in one territory might carry implications about reunification (at last) in 2007 or 08

That assumes that Panoz will stay with the other Series in 2007...and that is still not decided...at all...and I would not assume that they will...

IIRC, only 3 teams run the Panoz chassis in the IRL

Rahal-Letterman

Fernandez

Ganassi

That's 8 cars out of a 22-car field....although Ganassi sure has gone through quite a few of them this year...11 if you count the two Haas cars and Sam Schmidt at Indy....

If you could supply every team in one Series with cars, or 1/3 of the field with cars in the other, where would your focus be as a builder???
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 13:43 (Ref:1430726)   #5
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...510110435/1052

Just read it, Tim, and that was MY first question.....will Haas and Lola enter the IRL picture in '07 because of this? The IRL turned Penske down for building his own in the last chassis deal but this changes the climate. What will be the prices in '06 at the Lola parts truck at the CC races? This may explain the rumor that Ganassi pulled back a couple of his Lola show cars....he may be selling 'em to CC teams to run or use as spares next year. They're flower pots after next year. And there's no chance now that the CC chassis can be evolutionary so the teams will have a big bill to start the '07 season.

Lot of dynamics goin' on in this one.......
indycool is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 13:49 (Ref:1430730)   #6
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
There are many implications....

But IIRC, a new Lola chassis goes for about $450,000 USD, whereas the Panoz IRL roller chassis is priced at $330,000 or so....

There is a big difference in price there....
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 13:55 (Ref:1430737)   #7
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
That's about right as I recall, Tim..........we don't know how close Lola's new bid was for CC, or what Panoz bid, though. And these teams haven't had to pay even that for a chassis for several years now. Lot of money involved either way.
indycool is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 14:12 (Ref:1430746)   #8
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snrub
Perhaps in 2008 or 9 the series will be strong enough that they can let Lola compete with Panoz. If it's more expensive it would be up to the teams whether it was an advantage or not.

I think having a spec chassis is the way for ChampCar now.

Why add a costly variable?
Kicking-back is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 14:33 (Ref:1430762)   #9
Pete Fenelon
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
York
Posts: 419
Pete Fenelon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I do wonder if this deal isn't there on the back of some promises from Don to get more deeply involved in CCWS. He's exactly the kind of guy who can elevate the profile of the series....
Pete Fenelon is offline  
__________________
--
there's no room for enigmas in built-up areas
Old 11 Oct 2005, 14:36 (Ref:1430767)   #10
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Perhaps Lola will focus on sportscars.

paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Old 11 Oct 2005, 15:40 (Ref:1430819)   #11
Nordic
Veteran
 
Nordic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
West Sussex
Posts: 2,133
Nordic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
maybe Penske will as well...

whatever it seems to be a time of great change in the US that is going to impact other series in the coming year.
Nordic is offline  
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better.
H S Thompson 1937 - 2005
Old 11 Oct 2005, 15:50 (Ref:1430830)   #12
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well, here be the announcement......

http://www.champcarworldseries.com/N...le.asp?ID=9727
indycool is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 17:24 (Ref:1430920)   #13
extreme
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Canada
Edmonton, AB
Posts: 80
extreme should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
That article doesnt make it sound like there is going to be another engine manufacture other than ford in '07 either...
extreme is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 18:00 (Ref:1430967)   #14
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nordic
maybe Penske will as well...

whatever it seems to be a time of great change in the US that is going to impact other series in the coming year.

Why?????

Penske's team races with Dallara chassis in the IRL....and apparently, the Panoz people met with the IRL yesterday about this, and about extending their current agreement for 2006....

If the IRL doesn't have a problem with them supplying both Series, why wouldn't Panoz Motorsports group do both???
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 18:01 (Ref:1430968)   #15
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul-collins
Perhaps Lola will focus on sportscars.


Since their LMP2 seems to be the car to beat in that class, and the new LMP1 is in the works for 2006, sounds like a great place to make money to me....
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 18:12 (Ref:1430980)   #16
norman-normal
Veteran
 
norman-normal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Oceanside, Calif, USA
Posts: 803
norman-normal should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would not be very surprised to see the IRL adapt the same package, engine and all. This would solve a multitude of problems: it would allow both groups to do their thing, then meet at Indy for a showdown. ...It would create a lot of excitement and allow the IRL 'somewhat' gracefull exit from its engine problems.

What do you think?
norman-normal is offline  
__________________
"A gentelman is guilty of every crime that does not require courage" Oscar Wilde.
Old 11 Oct 2005, 19:38 (Ref:1431070)   #17
Uesque
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Ukraine
Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 161
Uesque should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"Another advantage is the addition of an on-board starter which will allow for less yellow-flag time during events. "

That's been a complaint forever.
Uesque is offline  
__________________
Rinji news o moshiagemasu!
Rinji news o moshiagemasu!
Godzilla ga Ginza hoomen e mukatte imasu!
Daishkyu hinan poope kudasai!
Daishkyu hinan poope kudasai!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 19:48 (Ref:1431080)   #18
Ac.
Racer
 
Ac.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Canada
Waterloo, Ont.
Posts: 343
Ac. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by norman-normal
I would not be very surprised to see the IRL adapt the same package, engine and all. This would solve a multitude of problems: it would allow both groups to do their thing, then meet at Indy for a showdown. ...It would create a lot of excitement and allow the IRL 'somewhat' gracefull exit from its engine problems.

What do you think?
I think it is wishful thinking. For the IRL to adopt the same chassis and engine package would be to admit defeat in the war of wills. It would be more likely for the engine woes and other difficulties facing the IRL (sponsorship exiting the series, teams possibly folding or defecting) to seriously damage the series before we see the two move together.

Even then, I'm not sure that we will see a reconcilliation. After all, Champ Car was lifeless on the table when some team owners decided it was worth saving. Perhaps someone has a crystal ball we can consult.
Ac. is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 20:24 (Ref:1431130)   #19
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I, too, believe it's wishful thinking. It's more likely that Lola, kicked out of CC, would head to IRL. Panoz has only three customers in the IRL running their cars and none are running at the front. Whether Panoz continues in IRL or not might well depend on its ability to create a "better mousetrap."
indycool is offline  
Old 11 Oct 2005, 21:22 (Ref:1431194)   #20
Jordi
Veteran
 
Jordi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Catalonia
Vilafranca del Penedés, CATALONIA
Posts: 5,276
Jordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It's kind of a shame that Lola was, em, shunted out of the way like this. Lola has been an important part of Champ Car racing for the last 15 years or so...
Jordi is offline  
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport."
-Jim Clark
Old 11 Oct 2005, 21:31 (Ref:1431211)   #21
luke
Veteran
 
luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
England
West Sussex, England
Posts: 7,263
luke should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridluke should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
As much as a chassis competition I'd like to see, at the end of the day a single chassis such as Panoz as the soul supplier is the best thing for Champ Car, and what is best for Champ Car then I am happy.
luke is offline  
__________________
The thrill from west hill
Old 11 Oct 2005, 23:14 (Ref:1431293)   #22
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!


Quote:
David Bowes:

The new car will be four or five inches shorter than the current one and we're thinking about reducing the track by three inches on each side but keeping the sidepods the same width to help avoid the interlocking of wheels. We'll use the underbody to deliver the downforce requirements that have been set (more aggressive tunnels, vortex generators, rear diffusers), reduce the size of the wings and still generate more downforce. This also allows driving closer together without dirty air and makes for a more nimble, racier car on a street circuit but it still retains its performance.
The chassis will be 165 lbs lighter, the engine 25hp greater.

Quote:
SpeedTV:

Other important novelties are the addition of an on-board starter, the possibility to add F1-style carbon-fiber brakes, and improved crash protection for drivers, including a rear structure suitable for oval events (hinting that schedule diversity remains a priority for the series’ honchos).
All pictures and quotes culled from SpeedTV's website.

Jordi...
Next year (their last) will mark Lola's 23rd consecutive year in ChampCar.
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 11 Oct 2005, 23:46 (Ref:1431325)   #23
Jordi
Veteran
 
Jordi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Catalonia
Vilafranca del Penedés, CATALONIA
Posts: 5,276
Jordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by macdaddy
Jordi...
Next year (their last) will mark Lola's 23rd consecutive year in ChampCar.
There you go... they've been in Champ Car for more than I've been anywhere!

I suppose it's me finding change difficult to accept, but that Lola, as much as I disliked it back in 2002, it grew on me. Those sidepods were aggressive.

The Panoz, in that simulated image, looks like an Infiniti Pro Series car. Hopefully reality will look better than fiction!
Jordi is offline  
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport."
-Jim Clark
Old 12 Oct 2005, 00:20 (Ref:1431344)   #24
Omega99
Veteran
 
Omega99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Canada
9Henday
Posts: 996
Omega99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uesque
"Another advantage is the addition of an on-board starter which will allow for less yellow-flag time during events. "

That's been a complaint forever.
Excellent.

I'm disapointed about the loss of Lola however.
Omega99 is offline  
Old 12 Oct 2005, 00:32 (Ref:1431349)   #25
The Snout
Veteran
 
The Snout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Australia
Posts: 1,480
The Snout should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
All my expectations have been met on this chassis, especially the aero,starters and pricing. Still looks like a Champ Car and we've retained the turbo. Can't see any downside.
The Snout is offline  
__________________
"All this amateur analysis leads nowhere and is insignificant......So you waste hours, days, months, years of your life for what end? A bit of one-upmanship on the internet?" - Wilton969
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 2007 Chassis macdaddy ChampCar World Series 54 23 Sep 2005 10:00
A contract is a contract but ... Kirk Formula One 17 3 May 2004 18:39
Interpublic cancel BGP contract/Bernie buys contract until 2015 (merged x2) Stephen Green Formula One 58 24 Apr 2004 06:04
I've got a contract Chris Strange Formula One 8 10 Aug 2001 14:55


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.