|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Nov 2004, 11:26 (Ref:1156940) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,189
|
Bubblejet or Inkjet
Does anybody have any thoughts about the relative merits or otherwise of bubblejet printers over inkjet or vice versa (basically Canon versus Epson)
I've heard that, certainly on the less expensive printers, that the bubble jets get clogged up very easily. |
||
__________________
"we love the winter, it brings us closer together" |
18 Nov 2004, 13:53 (Ref:1157055) | #2 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
Er, whats the difference?
|
||
|
18 Nov 2004, 14:04 (Ref:1157062) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 440
|
I think both are the same thing. Epson makes the best photo colour printer.
|
||
__________________
L'ENDURANCE, C'EST LE MANS! |
18 Nov 2004, 14:36 (Ref:1157089) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,189
|
Not the same ... there is a hint of it just being a trademark thing but BubbleJet uses heat to get the ink out whereas Inkjet pushes it out
|
||
__________________
"we love the winter, it brings us closer together" |
18 Nov 2004, 17:55 (Ref:1157229) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,973
|
see http://computer.howstuffworks.com/inkjet-printer3.htm
As far as clogged jets, I've had the problem on my old Canon but assumed it was more to do with the particular cartridge not being used for months at a time and the ink drying out. |
|
|
18 Nov 2004, 21:42 (Ref:1157449) | #6 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,152
|
I read all the computer mags tests for about 6 months and by far the best buy for the money was the HP 5150 which I bought from Staples. It was the same price in Argos as well. It has been excellent and the pictures it produces are also excellent (up to A4) with no problems. The drivers have never complained either and reckon the pictures produced are far superior than photgraphic paper images. To say Epson is the best is rubbish. Read all the tests (some on the web) and decide how much you want to spend as there will be a printer to suit your money.
|
||
__________________
Motorsport and aviation photography |
19 Nov 2004, 09:29 (Ref:1157831) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,189
|
Baz
Do you never produce A3 size prints? |
||
__________________
"we love the winter, it brings us closer together" |
19 Nov 2004, 11:40 (Ref:1157955) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 551
|
Epson 1290 A3+ printer with a Fotospeed inkflow system (correctly profiled), saves about 60% of the print costs!
|
||
__________________
vous tous qui passez ici souvenez-vous |
26 Nov 2004, 21:20 (Ref:1165189) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 797
|
Had a Canon i9950 for a few months now. Very good.
10D/300D images will go to A3 OK (provided they`re not too heavily cropped). I like the idea of Epson`s pigment-based (75 year archival) printers but they weren`t (and I presume are still not) doing it as an A3 printer back in the summer. Ilford papers + Canon genuine inks - haven`t noticed a fading problem yet. Am using the instant dry papers which are susceptible to gas fading but should be alright if you frame them. Will be interested to see what the reviews think of any Epson up-to-A3 pigment printers that must surely be coming soon. |
||
|
28 Nov 2004, 20:41 (Ref:1166495) | #10 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
Some people complain about glossy prints not being as good as dye ink printers, however the results can vary with different paper types, and I've got very good results from using Tetenal Premium Fine Art Glossy paper. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laminating Inkjet Prints | PaulSands | Motorsport Art & Photography | 7 | 29 Nov 2004 07:11 |