|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 May 2006, 12:11 (Ref:1605928) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Indy 500 - an irrelevance?
Indy used to be a absolute institution, a challenge, attracting cars and drivers from all over the world (well england at least). Crazy specials fought to get on the grid and qualifying was a real spectacle.
But today I look at the top five speeds and they were all set by effectivley the same car, the 33 car grid was more than twice oversubscribed and now they struggle to fill it. So is the Indy 500 now an irrelevance - in Europe its image is really tarnished now |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
11 May 2006, 12:15 (Ref:1605930) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 283
|
'Valid observation.
Irrelevant even in the US...and 'Indy's' image wasn't helped by the 2005 F1 debacle, either. The merger could change that, but it will take time. |
||
|
11 May 2006, 12:35 (Ref:1605942) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
An irrelevance? Hardly. It remains one of the oldest races in the world, and the challenge is still there, to be faster than everyone else, to keep your car in one piece and to keep it off the unforgiving walls for 500 miles. These days it also remains as one of the last true endurance tests in open-wheel racing. Obviously it's not like it used to be, but "an irrelevance"? To the naysayers, perhaps.
Also, you might want to look up your info when it comes to "struggling to fill 33 spots", as there should be several cars bumped from the field this year. Not to mention the starting grid overall will be stronger than it has been for quite a few years, and we should be in for one heckuva fight between primarily Penske, Ganassi and Andretti-Green this year. As for the F1-fiasco at Indy last year, it didn't hurt Indy a whole lot. It did, however, badly hurt Formula 1's reputation in the US. |
|
|
11 May 2006, 12:57 (Ref:1605961) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
well spotted rusty!
Ok Indy is different from what it was 15 yrs ago, and so what? Is F1 the same of Gilles' times? Having the same chassis configurations should guarantee a more even competition, and this year the package is one of the richest ever. Every racing formula is gradually shifting to monomake solutions (except for F1, which is nonetheless diminishing the technical competition) there must be some good reasons (beyond cost saving which is the first one!); maybe things will change in a decade, maybe but it's not essential to define the status of a race. |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
11 May 2006, 13:09 (Ref:1605971) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 407
|
Except the problem Indy has at the minute (and has for the last few years) is that people on both sides of the Atlantic know that there are at least a dozen drivers who should be on the grid fighting it out for what is still argueably one of the top trophies and prizes in motorsport, but aren't. All because of politics and contracts...
When you get the top level guys from Champ Car racing as well as the top draw boys from F1 having a cut too, then it would truly once again be the crown jewel of all motorsports in the year. It shouldn't take much to do, but it will never happen. Motorsport eh? Too much business and not enough sport any more. |
|
__________________
If in doubt, keep it flat out. |
11 May 2006, 13:28 (Ref:1605982) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 May 2006, 14:03 (Ref:1605998) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
11 May 2006, 15:30 (Ref:1606055) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Mansell the last active F1 driver I think.
But look at Le Mans (about as far from monomake as you can get) loads of different ways to try to achieve the same thing and attracting a great crop of drivers. Something Indy does not do. F1 has 22 teams wanting to play - thats 44 cars, Le Mans has 70- odd. One make series are never seen as top class. |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
11 May 2006, 15:38 (Ref:1606057) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 317
|
Hello
Every series has its ups and downs but the test of the Indy 500 will always be there. I'm sure in 1992 the same thoughts were going through peoples heads when only 29 cars started the Le Mans 24 Hours. Times change. In my opinion the top three motorsport events in "Jo Public's" head are Le Mans, Indy 500 and Monaco GP and its only us petrol heads who debate the nuances. Nick |
||
|
11 May 2006, 16:01 (Ref:1606069) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
indy has taken on the appearance of a county fair. Saw a picture of opening day with nothing but a few hundred people in the stand and bare aluminum everywhere was so sad it's funny. It's not even the richest motor race in the world anymore, the purse has stayed almost exactly the same for 15 years and was long surpassed by daytona's $18 million purse.
The field is filling out, but that's only because an excess of equipment is lying around from bankrupt teams and people are doing cut rate deals for this one race. Certainly not a spectacle worth turning up to see. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 May 2006, 16:07 (Ref:1606071) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Its seems the US guys agree
check out the auto ad - it seems to agree with me too |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
11 May 2006, 17:23 (Ref:1606112) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 May 2006, 17:36 (Ref:1606118) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for Daytona it's no wonder they have been able to pour money into the purse there, seeing how NASCAR haven't had to deal with all the BS politics and moronic fighting north-american open-wheel racing has had to endure the past 10 years. But I guess those CART head honchos who wanted to lessen the importance of the Indy 500, which in turn made TG make the extremely bad and stupid decision to demand control and then walk off with the race, knew what they were doing eh? |
|||
|
11 May 2006, 17:37 (Ref:1606120) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 May 2006, 19:19 (Ref:1606192) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Mansell returned to F1 in 1994.
Indy this year has how many world champions? Le Mans has the winner of the Dakar rally, the WR champ, a glut of ex and future F1 stars, and one current driver, Montagny. It has quality in depth. Indy has??? Last years race was really entertaining, but I just can't get exited by a one make grid, GP2 is exciting, but I never watch it - only recently has F3 woken me up (and only in Germany). One make is a plot for disaster. Reunification is too late as champ car has gone one make. Time for indy to become an open rules event again Last edited by ss_collins; 11 May 2006 at 19:21. |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
11 May 2006, 19:30 (Ref:1606199) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
As far as I remembered the purse in 1991 was around the $7.5 mark and was only just about $8 mil last year. If it had increased to $10 mil, I was unaware of that. If one looks at the facts objectively, no one can possibly argue the race is what is was over 10 years ago. It's barely a footnote in american sports anymore. Remember the 500 used to be like the super bowl and you could barely get tickets. It used to be exciting and interesting. It is not anymore. It's amazing to think back in 1994 I actually used to look forward to it. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 May 2006, 19:56 (Ref:1606244) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
It's no secret and no brainer that the 500 has lost it's touch compared to 11 years a go judging from the CART races I have seen and have on dvd (1985, 1989, 1992, 1993 & 1995 Indy 500s) as I've only seen the IRL 500s Live since I've been watching motorsport...Sure it's still Indy but it's not comparable, compared to those days...
|
||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
11 May 2006, 20:07 (Ref:1606266) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Irrelevant?
Far from really. The Indy 500 is one of the few races on the planet that could survive on its own, even with the collapse of the series around it. It still gets quite a bit of Press coverage in North America, and is still a big event. Obviously though, it is less relevant than it once was. |
||
|
11 May 2006, 20:15 (Ref:1606271) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
F1 dropped from 34 cars in 1991 to 20 in 1998 - was there a proportional loss of interest from the public? No. This year's field is one of the strongest of recent years, and at least nobody is hamstrung by uncompetitive Cosworth or Toyota equipment this year. Teams always did one-race deals using discarded equipment or equipment form bankrupt teams, that's nothing new. Mansell wasn't an active F1 driver when he did Indy 94 either - he returned afterwards
People who criticise the IRL for 'only' having 33 cars never notice the problems ChampCar has had in getting 18, or that NASCAR does not have full fields at the moment despite handing out huge prize funds for doing a couple of laps. The stadium will have more people there than any F1 race all year, and huge TV figures the world over. TV figures have dropped in the last decade for everything, not just sport, because there is more competition from satellite and cable, as well as easier access to DVD rental. |
||
|
11 May 2006, 20:28 (Ref:1606291) | #20 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, and Montagny wouldn't have been an active F-1 driver if it wasn't for Ide getting kicked out in the first place. Speaking of races losing its luster, Le Mans should be right up there - where have the factory teams been to stop Audi from utterly dominating the race year in and year out, for example? It's almost ridiculous how easy Audi has been able to completely own Le Mans as of late. Quote:
I can say, however, that you are part of a minority in your views about GP2 though, as there are a ton of people who think the GP2 races each Formula 1 weekend almost is the highlight of the weekend, given all the action just about every race produces. |
||||
|
11 May 2006, 20:34 (Ref:1606305) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for NASCAR, things have actually turned around there and the problems they had in 2004 (although they actually never had a race that didn't see 43 starting cars) are gone - you now have, on average, 4-5 cars not making the field for each race. Next year the number will be even higher as Toyota is coming in, adding at least three cars that aren't racing today (one extra to Michael Waltrip's team which will switch to Toyota and two brand new cars for the Red Bull Toyota Racing team). |
|||
|
11 May 2006, 20:40 (Ref:1606318) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
You have conveniently forgotten the other classes, with factory (or factory backed) entries by Porsche, Ferrari, Panoz, Aston Martin and Corvette... this year alone. Every year, there are 80-100 teams applying to race in it, including factories in the various classes... apparently much of the world disagrees with you. Of course, this isn't much besides a juvenile slagging match really. Your series is worse than mine.... how very boring. Why can't people stick to the facts? No, the Indy 500 is not irrelevant, but it is less relevant than it was. Easy, no? |
|||
|
11 May 2006, 21:14 (Ref:1606357) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 May 2006, 21:27 (Ref:1606372) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
Yep Bernie did that special deal with him to bring back some more interest back to F1 for special selected races that could fit in the schedule that year...
|
||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
11 May 2006, 21:57 (Ref:1606412) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong - I have nothing against the lower classes, and I think the GT (or whatever the name is of it this year) class, for example, is the most enjoyable one just because of what I mentioned earlier, with Audis boring domination as well as the fact that the open prototypes are.. well.. ugly. And deadly. Quote:
Hopefully Eurosport will at least have some sort of highlights package to show at some point. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Michelin in trouble at Indy/Michelin might not race at Indy (merged) | Sodemo | Formula One | 73 | 19 Jun 2005 16:07 |
Indy 500 fan | Racer-boy | IRL Indycar Series | 2 | 23 Apr 2004 21:45 |
Indy & F1 | Peter Mallett | Motorsport History | 17 | 10 Jan 2004 00:11 |
Indy 500 | Andy H | Trackside | 12 | 3 Jun 2003 23:38 |
Indy 500- who will win | petrobras_babe | IRL Indycar Series | 14 | 28 May 2001 13:40 |