|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Sep 2003, 12:13 (Ref:719455) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 93
|
Where will Pilbeam fall in the P1 or P2?
The Pilbeam is a bit of a car that is in the middle of the new formula for P1 and P2 next year. Yes, the car was built as an alumium (non carbon) SRPII but was also heavily modfied and given a new engine to compete (or hope to) with the MG and/or DBA.
When the new regs come in next year, will Pilbeam continue to try and be up with the big boys or will they go back to P2? |
||
|
15 Sep 2003, 12:40 (Ref:719498) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Since it is a 675, it would be in LMP1 I believe.
|
||
__________________
Oops |
15 Sep 2003, 15:18 (Ref:719629) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
LMP1, unless they extensively rework the car.
|
||
|
15 Sep 2003, 16:04 (Ref:719680) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
If it IS LMP1, the Pilbeam teams will get slaughtered.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
15 Sep 2003, 16:10 (Ref:719683) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
Aren't they getting slaughtered anyway
|
||
|
15 Sep 2003, 17:23 (Ref:719757) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
As it is now, it will be an LMP1; could be that they'll revise it, and run in LMP2, though.
|
||
__________________
Oops |
15 Sep 2003, 18:13 (Ref:719807) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
It is my understanding that "revising" a chassis from 2003 specs to 2004 specs would be a major undertaking....which is what it would take to be eligible as an LMP2....
I'm not convinced that it can be done easily on an existing chassis.... Now if Pilbeam wants to take what they have learned from their recent revisions to the chassis, and utilize those elements in a new chassis that they can sell, or maybe create a partnership with the die-hard ALMS and FIA-SCC teams who have run their cars in the past, that is another story altogether.... But I don't believe that Pilbeam can create a "Conversion Kit" for their existing chassis... Correct me if I'm wrong, but I could've sworn that MulsanneMike has said in earlier threads that this whole conversion concept would be difficult at best....I trust Mike as a reliable source.... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
15 Sep 2003, 18:17 (Ref:719817) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 521
|
It seems to me all the LM675 cars, except for the Lola/MGs will be put to pasture, as they won't be very competitive in LMP1 and would require too much costly modification to be able to run in LMP2...not worth bothering for most teams..
|
||
__________________
I specialize in the history of small displacement sports racers from France and Italy, circa 1930-1960. |
15 Sep 2003, 19:02 (Ref:719904) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,010
|
I was thinking that too, the LMP 675 concept is a bit swayed as far as the cars go...
As far as the Pilbeam, the Euro teams that run the SRP2 Pilbeams would still be LM2s would they not? Just the Bucknum Pilbeam being considered a 1? It doesnt seem like the mods. were that successful, although it did qualify much better than the past at Laguna!! |
||
|
15 Sep 2003, 19:03 (Ref:719905) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Sep 2003, 19:08 (Ref:719918) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,010
|
Oh yeah, youre right, it is competitve as both a 675 and a 900 (well SRP1)
|
||
|
15 Sep 2003, 19:12 (Ref:719925) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
ccybersdorf: since it is a 675 it'll be placed in 900?
which cars actually made the 675 minimum? what i would like to bring to your attention is that these cars cn go in any direction as most were portly and weighed in at over 730kg... so the pilbeam can put on some ballast weight and actually end up a 750 |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
15 Sep 2003, 19:23 (Ref:719942) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
gttouring - take a browse through some of the threads here. MuslanneMike provided very concise detail as to why this is not so simple. It is not just weight, there is a requirement in LMP750 that would somehow require a full redesign of the underside of the cars, at least that is how I remember it.
Most LMP675's will be obsolete. |
||
|
15 Sep 2003, 19:40 (Ref:719958) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Annoying anti edit function.
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Sep 2003, 21:18 (Ref:720060) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Thanks for finding that, Fogelhund....I couldn't remember the specifics but I knew that the changes were substantial....
|
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
15 Sep 2003, 21:38 (Ref:720076) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Oops |
15 Sep 2003, 21:50 (Ref:720088) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
The main issue converting a '03 spec car to '04 is the underfloor rules. The new "tunnel/diffuser" now begins some 1000 mm in front of the rear wheel (as opposed to at the rear wheel centerline for '03 and later). The downforce-reducing/yaw-stability-increasing chamfer that runs down the side of the car also is a major change. Essentially the outer edge of the car is some 100 mm above the reference plane as the chamfer's 7 degree angle bring's that point up.
So for next year till '05, your options are to continue to run your '03 car in '03 spec., or build a new car to '04 spec. |
|
|
15 Sep 2003, 22:10 (Ref:720102) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Thanks Mike.
|
||
|
16 Sep 2003, 02:15 (Ref:720221) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
ah yes i see now
and Cybers quite correct, sorry. 900 is going to be named LMP1 the more descriptive term LMP900 i rather am fond of as LMP1 has shades or SRP1, SRP2 ala Grand Am |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
16 Sep 2003, 02:16 (Ref:720222) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
or is it SR1 and SR2 and DP poop?
|
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
16 Sep 2003, 02:28 (Ref:720226) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 521
|
The DBA will have to race in LMP1 without rather major modifications, as will the Lola/MGs.
Again, I can't really see people making the modifications needed to race any curreny LM675/SR2 car in LMP2 next year. There are rumors R&S is now working on a LMP2 car for next year. |
||
__________________
I specialize in the history of small displacement sports racers from France and Italy, circa 1930-1960. |
16 Sep 2003, 13:18 (Ref:720701) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Hey doc, any connection to the Jon Lewis news?
|
||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
17 Sep 2003, 20:02 (Ref:722289) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
That connection would seem logical, but who knows...
|
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilbeam | Steve Wilkinson | The Chassis History Archive | 71 | 26 Nov 2022 07:52 |
The new Pilbeam MP 93-01 PB | Fab | Sportscar & GT Racing | 18 | 3 Jun 2005 02:55 |
New Pilbeam - Everything new is old again | danhx | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 12 Mar 2003 16:02 |
New Pilbeam | H16 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 17 | 7 Mar 2003 23:40 |
Pilbeam Dossier | RobweenerPI | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 8 Feb 2003 05:47 |