Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

View Poll Results: Would you like to see Honda return to Champcars?
Yes 27 51.92%
No 25 48.08%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Sep 2005, 06:09 (Ref:1417571)   #1
mabs_nsx
Veteran
 
mabs_nsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Australia
Where Rally Aus belongs - Perth, WA
Posts: 1,635
mabs_nsx is a back marker
Would you like to see Honda return to Champcars?

I am a huge Honda fan so my answer is yes.
mabs_nsx is offline  
Old 27 Sep 2005, 06:51 (Ref:1417584)   #2
mac
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
mac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridmac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridmac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I don't know.

I do not have anything against Honda and as far as I'm concerned they are certainly welcome back.

But I would like turbos to stay.
mac is offline  
Old 27 Sep 2005, 10:47 (Ref:1417764)   #3
enemy-ace
Veteran
 
enemy-ace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Canada
toronto, ontario, canada
Posts: 2,739
enemy-ace should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
eventually, yes! Right now? NO!
enemy-ace is offline  
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !"
Old 27 Sep 2005, 11:49 (Ref:1417813)   #4
Uesque
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Ukraine
Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 161
Uesque should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Only if costs could somehow be contained. They seem to bring exponentially escalating expenses wherever they go.
Uesque is offline  
__________________
Rinji news o moshiagemasu!
Rinji news o moshiagemasu!
Godzilla ga Ginza hoomen e mukatte imasu!
Daishkyu hinan poope kudasai!
Daishkyu hinan poope kudasai!
Old 27 Sep 2005, 13:04 (Ref:1417878)   #5
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
I voted "No".

- Too early. ChampCar is still in its infancy.
- Too expensive. We've seen many times what could happen.
- Will create "haves" and "have-nots".
- Gotta stick with the turbos.
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 27 Sep 2005, 14:30 (Ref:1417959)   #6
racefanatic
Racer
 
racefanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
United States
Mindy
Posts: 393
racefanatic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No thanks. We are fine without them. And I think they will be fine without a return to Champ Car.

And we HAVE to keep the turbos!!
racefanatic is offline  
__________________
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.
Old 27 Sep 2005, 15:11 (Ref:1417995)   #7
2112
Racer
 
2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Antarctica
FL
Posts: 374
2112 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No.
It`s not the time for that. I would not be against it in the future though.
2112 is offline  
Old 27 Sep 2005, 15:46 (Ref:1418021)   #8
racinthestreets
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Wenatchee, Washington
Posts: 478
racinthestreets should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What if they only sold their engine same price as the Cosworth Ford and did not sponsor teams like they do in F1 and IRL? CCWS can restrict the amount of money that a Honda or Ford are allowed to "rent" a team. If Honda and Ford had the same set of rules regarding development, sponsorship it would help create the environment that is allowing the series to grow - that is to have "haves" and no "have nots". The rest is sponsors, team chemistry and driver talent. Just thinking out loud, but not too hard to tax my limited capacity.
racinthestreets is offline  
__________________
racinthestreets
"If dreams don't come true - are they lies?" The Boss
Old 27 Sep 2005, 16:02 (Ref:1418039)   #9
Jordi
Veteran
 
Jordi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Catalonia
Vilafranca del Penedés, CATALONIA
Posts: 5,276
Jordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Where's the "I don't know" option?
Jordi is offline  
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport."
-Jim Clark
Old 27 Sep 2005, 17:17 (Ref:1418091)   #10
brightline
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
United States
Temple Terrace, FL
Posts: 390
brightline should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I vote no because the cosworth package has been so good for competition, cost-cutting and reliability.

The only way I would let Honda back would be if they agreed to along with Ford to both badge the same Cosworth engine. That would be the ultimate engine parity.

If you hate that idea, then maybe allow honda back, but all hondas engines are drawn from a hat to the honda teams by Champ Car. That way you don't get a semi-factory team like AGR in the IRL.
brightline is offline  
Old 27 Sep 2005, 17:44 (Ref:1418104)   #11
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by macdaddy
I voted "No".

- Too early. ChampCar is still in its infancy.
- Too expensive. We've seen many times what could happen.
- Will create "haves" and "have-nots".
- Gotta stick with the turbos.
This is how I see it. Ensuring any kind pf parity would be very difficult, other than having some of teams badged as Honda - but what if Honda throw more money to those teams, as a very cheap way of making uninformed viewers think their engines are superior?
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Old 27 Sep 2005, 20:56 (Ref:1418267)   #12
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
As long as the situation is heavily regulated. Something along the lines of Grand Am's regulated engines with sponsorship rules as well would work.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 28 Sep 2005, 01:52 (Ref:1418420)   #13
mueber
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
United States
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Posts: 82
mueber should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I voted "yes." But that yes is qualified. If honda can accept that all they get for being a supplier is a thank you, and costs can be contained, then I say "yes." If not, I say "no."
mueber is offline  
__________________
Outside of a dog a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
~~Groucho Marx
Old 28 Sep 2005, 03:32 (Ref:1418460)   #14
The Snout
Veteran
 
The Snout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Australia
Posts: 1,480
The Snout should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Way too early to vote either yes or no until any conditions under which they would be proposed to return are made clear.
The Snout is offline  
__________________
"All this amateur analysis leads nowhere and is insignificant......So you waste hours, days, months, years of your life for what end? A bit of one-upmanship on the internet?" - Wilton969
Old 28 Sep 2005, 08:14 (Ref:1418581)   #15
rustyfan
Veteran
 
rustyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Sweden
Posts: 5,419
rustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Honda would probably not be very interested in bringing a turbo-engine considering the engine they would like to use is the one they designed in preparation for what they believed would be the new IndyCar specs (before the announcement was made that the IndyCar series would stick to its current configuration).

So as far as I can tell Champ Car would either need to drop the turbos or come up with a set of rules that allows both engine-types, and I don't think either alternative is a very realistic one.
rustyfan is offline  
Old 28 Sep 2005, 09:54 (Ref:1418688)   #16
carsten66
Veteran
 
carsten66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Germany
Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 696
carsten66 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If Honda is interested to take part under the same regulations - why not?! Honda has a big tradition in racing and Champ Car could add one more well-known brand to his list (wellcome back...).
carsten66 is offline  
Old 28 Sep 2005, 10:53 (Ref:1418769)   #17
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Turbo Ford engines against normally-aspirated Hondas (presumably with no Push-To-Pass) could be interesting, but they need to be stopped form putting too much money into the whole thing.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Old 28 Sep 2005, 11:04 (Ref:1418784)   #18
BSchneiderFan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 5,721
BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!BSchneiderFan is going for a new lap record!
I understand the cost implications, but I would dearly love to see Champ Cars back to a multi-chassis, multi-engine format.
BSchneiderFan is offline  
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?"
Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..."
Old 28 Sep 2005, 13:11 (Ref:1418938)   #19
StickShift
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
West Vancouver
Posts: 588
StickShift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
a Honda vs. Ford competition would bring money, sponsorship, better teams, and better drivers. It might even force reunification. It's a no brainer.

It's a good sign that the head honcho of all of Ford Racing was at the meeting IMO.
StickShift is offline  
__________________
Ten-Tenths F1 Results Prediction Competition—2005 Champion!
Old 28 Sep 2005, 16:22 (Ref:1419116)   #20
Amar7605
Veteran
 
Amar7605's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United States
Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 1,065
Amar7605 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree with rustyfan. Since Honda has already designed its IRL-spec engine, it's doubtful that they would want to switch to turbos.

So, unless Champ Car changes its engine formula for '07 I highly doubt that Honda will join Champ Car.

If Honda does enter Champ Car, then yes costs should be restricted so that there isn't parity and there aren't factory teams. But Honda won't like that because factory teams are how R&D gets developed.

In the end, I don't know. It would be a good thing initially, but there is potential for danger.
Amar7605 is offline  
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too!
Old 28 Sep 2005, 17:14 (Ref:1419147)   #21
2112
Racer
 
2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Antarctica
FL
Posts: 374
2112 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Although I don`t know the source, in another forum apparently Robert Clarke says this.
Quote:
"The Cosworth name doesn't have the kind of exposure we feel we really need. You would have the might of Honda competing against a racing engine company which would unfortunately create a no-win situation. If you win, you should have won, and if you lose, you look really bad. So the competition we need is true manufacturer competition."
If that`s what they want, they have no choice but sports cars in the short term.
2112 is offline  
Old 28 Sep 2005, 17:18 (Ref:1419149)   #22
Amar7605
Veteran
 
Amar7605's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United States
Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 1,065
Amar7605 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If this is the case, then the only way Honda would enter Champ Cars is if another major manufacturer or manufacturers enter the series.
Amar7605 is offline  
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too!
Old 28 Sep 2005, 20:24 (Ref:1419314)   #23
Tenoch
Veteran
 
Tenoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
Another Michigan Town
Posts: 670
Tenoch should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I said no cause, Ive only been watching since 2002 and so far I think that the best year has been 2003 with the threeway battle for the championship and still competitive reynards. The series does not need Honda back.
Tenoch is offline  
__________________
Not even death can stop me, and if death takes me by surprise, it's more than welcome.
Old 29 Sep 2005, 02:02 (Ref:1419553)   #24
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2112
If that`s what they want, they have no choice but sports cars in the short term.
In the short term?
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Old 29 Sep 2005, 14:13 (Ref:1420008)   #25
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amar7605
I agree with rustyfan. Since Honda has already designed its IRL-spec engine, it's doubtful that they would want to switch to turbos.

If Honda does enter Champ Car, then yes costs should be restricted so that there isn't parity and there aren't factory teams. But Honda won't like that because factory teams are how R&D gets developed.
As for the first point, Honda also has a 2.65L turbo engine design sitting around collecting dust. It's the same thing either way. I didn't realize that Ford was represented at the meetings as well. Perhaps if Honda was insistant that they wanted the new design to be used, Ford might be willing to put money into a new design to compete with Honda.

As for the second point, I don't think "factory teams" need to be outlawed but the rate at which improvements can be made needs to be regulated. Perhaps that means once per season or a couple of times per year. Then they can say that each team may not have more than $X contributed towards their budget from an engine manufacturer. If you had this kind of situation all the teams useing a particular type of engine would likely have the same spec.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F1 cars Vs ChampCars runshaw ChampCar World Series 7 30 Aug 2005 18:16
Franchitti to return at Honda Indy 225!!! Down F0rce IRL Indycar Series 3 16 Jun 2003 01:06
Have Champcars always.... tanalised ChampCar World Series 4 3 Dec 2002 16:29
Mugen Honda - Will they return? Yoong Montoya Formula One 6 3 Aug 2002 07:03
Honda Return - OFFICIAL! Craig Touring Car Racing 12 18 Jan 2002 18:57


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.