|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
View Poll Results: Would you like to see Honda return to Champcars? | |||
Yes | 27 | 51.92% | |
No | 25 | 48.08% | |
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27 Sep 2005, 06:09 (Ref:1417571) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,635
|
Would you like to see Honda return to Champcars?
I am a huge Honda fan so my answer is yes.
|
||
|
27 Sep 2005, 06:51 (Ref:1417584) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
|
I don't know.
I do not have anything against Honda and as far as I'm concerned they are certainly welcome back. But I would like turbos to stay. |
|
|
27 Sep 2005, 10:47 (Ref:1417764) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,739
|
eventually, yes! Right now? NO!
|
||
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !" |
27 Sep 2005, 11:49 (Ref:1417813) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 161
|
Only if costs could somehow be contained. They seem to bring exponentially escalating expenses wherever they go.
|
||
__________________
Rinji news o moshiagemasu! Rinji news o moshiagemasu! Godzilla ga Ginza hoomen e mukatte imasu! Daishkyu hinan poope kudasai! Daishkyu hinan poope kudasai! |
27 Sep 2005, 13:04 (Ref:1417878) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
I voted "No".
- Too early. ChampCar is still in its infancy. - Too expensive. We've seen many times what could happen. - Will create "haves" and "have-nots". - Gotta stick with the turbos. |
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
27 Sep 2005, 14:30 (Ref:1417959) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 393
|
No thanks. We are fine without them. And I think they will be fine without a return to Champ Car.
And we HAVE to keep the turbos!! |
||
__________________
In a minute there is time For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. |
27 Sep 2005, 15:11 (Ref:1417995) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 374
|
No.
It`s not the time for that. I would not be against it in the future though. |
||
|
27 Sep 2005, 15:46 (Ref:1418021) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 478
|
What if they only sold their engine same price as the Cosworth Ford and did not sponsor teams like they do in F1 and IRL? CCWS can restrict the amount of money that a Honda or Ford are allowed to "rent" a team. If Honda and Ford had the same set of rules regarding development, sponsorship it would help create the environment that is allowing the series to grow - that is to have "haves" and no "have nots". The rest is sponsors, team chemistry and driver talent. Just thinking out loud, but not too hard to tax my limited capacity.
|
||
__________________
racinthestreets "If dreams don't come true - are they lies?" The Boss |
27 Sep 2005, 16:02 (Ref:1418039) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
Where's the "I don't know" option?
|
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
27 Sep 2005, 17:17 (Ref:1418091) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 390
|
I vote no because the cosworth package has been so good for competition, cost-cutting and reliability.
The only way I would let Honda back would be if they agreed to along with Ford to both badge the same Cosworth engine. That would be the ultimate engine parity. If you hate that idea, then maybe allow honda back, but all hondas engines are drawn from a hat to the honda teams by Champ Car. That way you don't get a semi-factory team like AGR in the IRL. |
||
|
27 Sep 2005, 17:44 (Ref:1418104) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
27 Sep 2005, 20:56 (Ref:1418267) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
As long as the situation is heavily regulated. Something along the lines of Grand Am's regulated engines with sponsorship rules as well would work.
|
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
28 Sep 2005, 01:52 (Ref:1418420) | #13 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 82
|
I voted "yes." But that yes is qualified. If honda can accept that all they get for being a supplier is a thank you, and costs can be contained, then I say "yes." If not, I say "no."
|
||
__________________
Outside of a dog a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. ~~Groucho Marx |
28 Sep 2005, 03:32 (Ref:1418460) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,480
|
Way too early to vote either yes or no until any conditions under which they would be proposed to return are made clear.
|
|
__________________
"All this amateur analysis leads nowhere and is insignificant......So you waste hours, days, months, years of your life for what end? A bit of one-upmanship on the internet?" - Wilton969 |
28 Sep 2005, 08:14 (Ref:1418581) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Honda would probably not be very interested in bringing a turbo-engine considering the engine they would like to use is the one they designed in preparation for what they believed would be the new IndyCar specs (before the announcement was made that the IndyCar series would stick to its current configuration).
So as far as I can tell Champ Car would either need to drop the turbos or come up with a set of rules that allows both engine-types, and I don't think either alternative is a very realistic one. |
|
|
28 Sep 2005, 09:54 (Ref:1418688) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 696
|
If Honda is interested to take part under the same regulations - why not?! Honda has a big tradition in racing and Champ Car could add one more well-known brand to his list (wellcome back...).
|
||
|
28 Sep 2005, 10:53 (Ref:1418769) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Turbo Ford engines against normally-aspirated Hondas (presumably with no Push-To-Pass) could be interesting, but they need to be stopped form putting too much money into the whole thing.
|
||
|
28 Sep 2005, 11:04 (Ref:1418784) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
I understand the cost implications, but I would dearly love to see Champ Cars back to a multi-chassis, multi-engine format.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
28 Sep 2005, 13:11 (Ref:1418938) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 588
|
a Honda vs. Ford competition would bring money, sponsorship, better teams, and better drivers. It might even force reunification. It's a no brainer.
It's a good sign that the head honcho of all of Ford Racing was at the meeting IMO. |
||
__________________
Ten-Tenths F1 Results Prediction Competition—2005 Champion! |
28 Sep 2005, 16:22 (Ref:1419116) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
I agree with rustyfan. Since Honda has already designed its IRL-spec engine, it's doubtful that they would want to switch to turbos.
So, unless Champ Car changes its engine formula for '07 I highly doubt that Honda will join Champ Car. If Honda does enter Champ Car, then yes costs should be restricted so that there isn't parity and there aren't factory teams. But Honda won't like that because factory teams are how R&D gets developed. In the end, I don't know. It would be a good thing initially, but there is potential for danger. |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
28 Sep 2005, 17:14 (Ref:1419147) | #21 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 374
|
Although I don`t know the source, in another forum apparently Robert Clarke says this.
Quote:
|
|||
|
28 Sep 2005, 17:18 (Ref:1419149) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
If this is the case, then the only way Honda would enter Champ Cars is if another major manufacturer or manufacturers enter the series.
|
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
28 Sep 2005, 20:24 (Ref:1419314) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 670
|
I said no cause, Ive only been watching since 2002 and so far I think that the best year has been 2003 with the threeway battle for the championship and still competitive reynards. The series does not need Honda back.
|
||
__________________
Not even death can stop me, and if death takes me by surprise, it's more than welcome. |
29 Sep 2005, 02:02 (Ref:1419553) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
29 Sep 2005, 14:13 (Ref:1420008) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
Quote:
As for the second point, I don't think "factory teams" need to be outlawed but the rate at which improvements can be made needs to be regulated. Perhaps that means once per season or a couple of times per year. Then they can say that each team may not have more than $X contributed towards their budget from an engine manufacturer. If you had this kind of situation all the teams useing a particular type of engine would likely have the same spec. |
|||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F1 cars Vs ChampCars | runshaw | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 30 Aug 2005 18:16 |
Franchitti to return at Honda Indy 225!!! | Down F0rce | IRL Indycar Series | 3 | 16 Jun 2003 01:06 |
Have Champcars always.... | tanalised | ChampCar World Series | 4 | 3 Dec 2002 16:29 |
Mugen Honda - Will they return? | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 6 | 3 Aug 2002 07:03 |
Honda Return - OFFICIAL! | Craig | Touring Car Racing | 12 | 18 Jan 2002 18:57 |