|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
1 Oct 2004, 21:41 (Ref:1112835) | #1 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Journalists - Ignorant, lazy or stupid?
The Times has three pages (tabloid version) of Silverstone comment today. Much of it is pretty routine (but not wrong). But why can't a supposedly reputable "Paper of Record" get basic facts nearly right?
There is a section called "Memorable moments at the circuit" which is under a Silverstone not British GP heading. It includes Quote:
With apologies to any journalists reading this, it does bear out my view that, if you know about a subject, the best any piece of journalism will get is: Nearly right, Lord Copper Regards Jim Last edited by JimW; 1 Oct 2004 at 21:43. |
|||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
1 Oct 2004, 21:44 (Ref:1112837) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
Just a mistake. I'm always picking up on mistakes in books and magazines etc.
|
||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
1 Oct 2004, 21:54 (Ref:1112840) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 567
|
that means your an anorak then luke.
|
||
|
1 Oct 2004, 21:54 (Ref:1112841) | #4 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,776
|
Pretty big mistake.
|
||
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach. |
1 Oct 2004, 21:55 (Ref:1112842) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 567
|
not like i'm any different though.
|
||
|
1 Oct 2004, 22:41 (Ref:1112879) | #6 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,954
|
Re: Journalists - Ignorant, lazy or stupid?
Quote:
However it is both 'just a mistake' and 'shoddy'. Still, if Silverstone goes then that is probably the loss of the British GP gone. In which case 1976 is relevant... Last edited by Adam43; 1 Oct 2004 at 22:43. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
1 Oct 2004, 22:42 (Ref:1112880) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Journalists - ignorant, lazy or stupid?
After careful consideration of all the facts, I'd have to say that invariably they are all three. |
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
1 Oct 2004, 22:43 (Ref:1112881) | #8 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,776
|
Re: Re: Journalists - Ignorant, lazy or stupid?
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach. |
1 Oct 2004, 22:53 (Ref:1112889) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 308
|
Re: Re: Re: Journalists - Ignorant, lazy or stupid?
Quote:
|
||
|
1 Oct 2004, 22:59 (Ref:1112894) | #10 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,954
|
Re: Re: Re: Journalists - Ignorant, lazy or stupid?
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
1 Oct 2004, 23:16 (Ref:1112911) | #11 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
I'm a journalist and am not ignorant, lazy or stupid.
But I do make mistakes sometimes. |
|
|
1 Oct 2004, 23:25 (Ref:1112925) | #12 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,954
|
Lets take this more generally.
I despise the method of journalism that means you get a decent story by reporting something on the basis of little fact. Some Italian or German mag. reports so and so... There should be more of an attitude of "if I have nothing good to say, I shall say nothing". However journo are paid to write, they can't just say nothing. What is worse is that so many (of us) just lap it up as fact. Even those who claim to be cynics! Still one of my best friends is a 'journo'. Stupid, lazy and ignorant you could not accuse him of. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
1 Oct 2004, 23:30 (Ref:1112932) | #13 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
The worst type of journalism is that where a sensational headline or intro is not supported by the story.
|
|
|
1 Oct 2004, 23:47 (Ref:1112941) | #14 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,954
|
Yes, I can imagine that in that profession it must annoy the whatsit out of you!
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
2 Oct 2004, 00:18 (Ref:1112958) | #15 | ||||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,776
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Journalists - Ignorant, lazy or stupid?
Quote:
Quote:
In all seriousness, if you're going to report something in an official publication you should at least get your facts right. I't's not exactly a grey area is it? The Brands Hatch incident is nothing to do with Silverstone. Surely it's not that hard if you do your reasarch. Sorry, but the obvious mistake just to me screams ignorance on the part of the journo that wrote it. I mean, if they got the corner wrong thats understandable, but the wrong track? Last edited by Spudgun; 2 Oct 2004 at 00:27. |
||||
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach. |
2 Oct 2004, 09:03 (Ref:1113141) | #16 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,954
|
Ooops, sorry Spudgun
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
2 Oct 2004, 10:24 (Ref:1113192) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
I think I general point here is if the papers get simple facts wrong about something you know about then you can pick it up and discount the story as it calls into question all the other facts in an article.
What should worry us all is when we have no knowledge about a more serious subject and assume the paper has reported the facts correctly. |
||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
2 Oct 2004, 10:39 (Ref:1113201) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,622
|
Last night one of the TV stations in Aus said that Silverstone was the site of the very first ever Grand Prix ...
|
||
|
2 Oct 2004, 10:59 (Ref:1113225) | #19 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 104
|
Just out of interest, if I posted a thread entitled 'Driver X - ignorant, lazy or stupid?' how long would that last before being pulled? I'd have half a dozen people crying 'bash' before I could think twice. Why is it journalists are fair game and not drivers, team owners etc?
|
||
|
2 Oct 2004, 11:06 (Ref:1113231) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Fair point. Mind you, if you were to post 'driver x - ignorant, lazy or stupid' and then back that up with some kind of reasonable argument then it certainly wouldn't get pulled, unless it subsequently descended into a bashfest...
Some journalists do kind of set themselves up for it though, don't you think? Of course, I was being a little facetious when I said "all three", it would be wrong to tar all journalists with the same brush. |
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
2 Oct 2004, 11:16 (Ref:1113242) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
There was is a classic piece of reporting on Autosports web page. In the Sportscar section there is a picture of James Weaver giving the thumbs up, the text then refers to him winning the Petit LM race with JJ Letho.
The problem is that James drives for Dyson and not Audi, Letho's team mate was Marco Werner. While not a crime, mistakes happen, but to leave it up without amending the picture for over 5 days compounds the error. |
||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
2 Oct 2004, 11:20 (Ref:1113247) | #22 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 104
|
It looks to me like a simple mistake, which we all make. I've not seen any reasonable argument to back up "lazy" - the guy produced a three-page spread with many thousands of words at short notice. "Stupid" wouldn't seem appropriate for someone who is among the most trusted F1 writers out there (I presume Kevin Eason wrote it, although I've not seen the paper). "Ignorant" is more subjective but I'd suggest a three-page spread with one error doesn't stand up as a case for major ignorance.
|
||
|
2 Oct 2004, 11:53 (Ref:1113283) | #23 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Shouldn't this be merged with the Autosport thread in Armchair E? :confused:
Last edited by Knowlesy; 2 Oct 2004 at 11:53. |
|
|
5 Oct 2004, 07:32 (Ref:1115600) | #24 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 198
|
|||
|
5 Oct 2004, 08:18 (Ref:1115619) | #25 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,954
|
Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ignorant question about carbon fibre on F1 cars | Suzy | Racing Technology | 8 | 27 Sep 2004 07:26 |
Excuse the ignorant American but... | Scrutineer78 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 12 | 18 Jan 2004 22:09 |
Lucky for the journalists... | corkholio | ChampCar World Series | 8 | 13 Sep 2003 07:08 |