|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
10 Mar 2005, 11:20 (Ref:1248449) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
Should FIA GT and LMES merge?
Well, it seems that:
1. They are competing for entries in the GT classes, 2. Both are run by SRO, 3. In North America there is just the ALMS, so could that example be followed in Europe? Maybe an 8 race series with the Spa 24 hours retained from FIA GT and both Monza and Silverstone rounds to be 1000km races. Gentlemen (and Ladies, if any), your thoughts? |
||
|
10 Mar 2005, 11:39 (Ref:1248458) | #2 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,161
|
Possible. Although there are full grids in both at the moment, there is no need, IMHO. Perhaps it would be nice though.
The main problem, as I see it, is that race winners in the FIAGT would become class winners in LMES. It is nice for the GTs to have their moment in the (full) limelight. In addition what would you do with weight penalties? And there is the Mazza question! Last edited by Adam43; 10 Mar 2005 at 11:40. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Mar 2005, 11:44 (Ref:1248465) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Yes of course they could merge. Since LMES also "harbours" the prototypes, we could then separate the prototypes and form a new series for them, and run the FIA and ACO GTs in separate classes as the regulations are not (yet?) identical. It would make it all so much clearer, and easier to follow.
|
||
__________________
Oops |
10 Mar 2005, 11:51 (Ref:1248470) | #4 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
L'ENDURANCE, C'EST LE MANS! |
10 Mar 2005, 13:10 (Ref:1248519) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,356
|
Quote:
IMO there is enough entrants/differences between the series to keep the seperate, wait until teams have to choose one or t'other then we'll see what one survives. |
||
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move |
10 Mar 2005, 14:42 (Ref:1248584) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Quote:
Better yet, start the GTs from pit lane after three hours so that they all end at 6 hours! |
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
10 Mar 2005, 12:33 (Ref:1248493) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 247
|
Sounds nice, but when the races should be held ? During Super Racing Weekend events ? There could be some problems with racing weekend schedule. SRW includes also WTCC and other chapionships. FIA GT races are only 3 hrs long, and they fit well. 1000km LMES-style races will be to long for sunday. I think, WTCC is now most important for organizers, and they want it in attratcive daytime. So, Sportscar and GT race will have to be either moved to saturday, or shorter. And I dont want that.
And, if this will be different events, SRW will be much less atrractive. It's also not a good idea, it'll be hard to replace FIA GT with other atrractive champioship. |
||
|
10 Mar 2005, 12:59 (Ref:1248511) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
I think WTCC and FIA GT will go their separate ways in the not too distant future anyway. WTCC is already shaping up to be very good (looking to increase the length of its races, too) and the merged LMES/FIA GT series will be (on paper, anyway) attractive enough to stand on its own two feet. I think KSO and SRO will not be too bothered if they can do things on their own.
But I don't think the new merged series should get rid of the prototypes. Every race should become a real Le Mans type race by itself. |
||
|
10 Mar 2005, 13:02 (Ref:1248512) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
But will teams currently running in FIA GTs really want to give up their chance at overall wins, especially in races like the Spa 24 Hours? I don't see a problem with the FIA series and the LMES co-existing, at least at the moment. If it ain't broke...
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
10 Mar 2005, 17:39 (Ref:1248772) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
1. Are they really? How many LMES GT team's could afford to travel around the world in FIA GT events? 2. Well, SRO may promote the LMES but it is an ACO series that was set up specifically to promote prototype (and Le Mans style) racing in Europe. FIA GT was set-up to promote, guess what, GT racing! 3. You also have Grand-Am |
||
|
10 Mar 2005, 17:45 (Ref:1248777) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
Quote from JAG: "1. Are they really? How many LMES GT team's could afford to travel around the world in FIA GT events?"
Or the prototype teams for that matter. Quote from JAG: "2. Well, SRO may promote the LMES but it is an ACO series that was set up specifically to promote prototype (and Le Mans style) racing in Europe. FIA GT was set-up to promote, guess what, GT racing!" Agreed. They are separate and promote separate ideals of racing. They also cater to different teams as pointed out in your first point. Quote from JAG: "3. You also have Grand-Am" Ah, but we also have the Maserati MC12! Last edited by jhansen; 10 Mar 2005 at 17:49. |
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
27 Mar 2005, 22:44 (Ref:1263211) | #12 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11
|
From a team point of view, I can tell you that it wouldn't be a good idea to merge the series - for some of the reasons some of you have pointed out, and for other financial baed reasons. Currently the 2 series work well together; there is more of a 'common understanding' now beween the ACO and FIA which helps so that's a step in the right direction in terms of changng the cars to run in the correct 'spec' for each series (we are running our cars in both series..) but overall it works well as 2 stand-alone series.
|
|
|
27 Mar 2005, 22:52 (Ref:1263216) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
Do you not find it a little worrying that the FIA GT series is seemingly moving to more of a sprint based format, particulalrly for teams who rely on pay drivers? Will you need an MC12 or Aston to win in that series sooner rather than later? Last edited by JAG; 27 Mar 2005 at 22:54. |
||
|
28 Mar 2005, 11:52 (Ref:1263455) | #14 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Thanks for the comment. In my opinion, the sprint races are essential for GT racing - for a number of reasons...to attract a bigger fan base that can 'understand' better the format, and for live TV which attracts the sponsors. The stye of format suits us ok - we are happy running 3 hour races and the FIA and SRO do it better than anyone else. In terms of 'pay drivers' - there are indeed less than in previous years but GT racing has been based on this format since its birth. We have 2 professional drivers in our #7 Saleen and will confirm at least one more in our #8 Saleen before the Monza race. Even our Porsche has good fast drivers. With regard to the MC12, in the last 3 races this car took part in the FIA GT, we were faster than at least one of them (Oschersleben and Dubai) - so really not too worried about them. I think one should consider the capability of the teams running the cars rather than the cars themselves...that will be what makes the difference in each race - in my opinion! We can make no mistakes if we are to beat them, this is for sure, but the pressure is on them i think. Nobody will be expecting too much from us.. Many thanks Last edited by GNM1; 28 Mar 2005 at 11:55. |
||
|
28 Mar 2005, 05:31 (Ref:1263320) | #15 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
Quote:
What is the interrest for GNM to enter cars in both series ? Each one must have its own advantages : what are they, for a team ? Last edited by Fab; 28 Mar 2005 at 05:32. |
|||
|
28 Mar 2005, 11:44 (Ref:1263449) | #16 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11
|
message to FAB
My pleasure - thanks to you.
Regards your question about entering both series, we enter FIA GT because in our opinion it is the pinnacle championship of world GT racing. We can win races outright and show we can run competetive Saleen's against the world's best GT cars. We enter LMES for Le Mans entry, and for winning 1000kms races - there's a big difference in tactics but essentially both are sprint races from lights to flag. Thanks Last edited by GNM1; 28 Mar 2005 at 11:47. |
|
|
27 Mar 2005, 23:11 (Ref:1263231) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,366
|
I dont know about "needing" a MC12 or Aston to win JAG. The Saleen S7R is very competitve in the series, more competitive than the DBR9 will be IMO, sure the DBR9's outperformed the ACEMCO Saleen at Sebring, but not on pace. A sprint format suits the S7R's, so I dont see any reason why they coudnt beat off the DBR9's, and perhaps the MC12's. And JAG, as has been widely publicised, the FIA GT championship is becoming more and more professional, and there are now in fact very few pay drivers in the championship, read Stephane Ratel's speech and he too backs this up. The FIA GT championship IMO is going in the right direction at the moment.
|
||
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite! |
28 Mar 2005, 11:42 (Ref:1263445) | #18 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11
|
message to Saleen S7R
Hi Saleen S7R
Good choice of 'Handle' by the way! The S7 is indeed competitive. We can be up there and ahead of the DBR9 - and with the right driver package it is possible...we have made a lot of changes to our 2 Saleen's for this year - chassis work, dampers, Pirelli tyres - and we'll see how it pans out. The DBR9 is abrand new car and Prodrive have enormous resources so it will be interesting to see how we match up against them at Silverstone for instance (FIA GT). We do all our development independantly from the factory - we are pretty much there with reliability but nwe have to constantly improve to stay at the front. Cheers Last edited by GNM1; 28 Mar 2005 at 11:45. |
|
|
28 Mar 2005, 00:16 (Ref:1263255) | #19 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
|
IMO merging the series would be a great idea. If we could bundle all the potential interest for sportscar racing in one strong, competitive and exciting series with a good media package, sooner or later this series is gonna attract more factories making the series even more competitive. We could have new, amazing prototypes each year, instead of five year old cars dominating everything, and sportscar racing could return and go beyond, to where it was in 1999.
Just my wishful thoughts... |
||
|
28 Mar 2005, 05:37 (Ref:1263321) | #20 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
My 2 p, from people wtaching the races : the series allow fans to chose on the basis of their own taste, enduros or more "long sprint" races. As Chris mentionned it above, it let place to cars that fit more to three-hours races (Saleens), and on the other hand cars that are more successul on long races.
And FIA-GT let the GT cars win the overall in prestigious races (Spa). "Le mieux est l'énemi du bien" = "the better is the enemy of the good" (don't know the equivalent in english) ; it means that always change things to what seems better can lead to go to worse... Last edited by Fab; 28 Mar 2005 at 05:37. |
||
|
28 Mar 2005, 07:34 (Ref:1263338) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,626
|
Merging is indeed a tempting ideaif we look at today's very well populated fields and just a handful of factory teams...would it be affordable in the long run for privateers? If it would happen anyway it should be a combination of real endurance (1000km+ races) and some "sprints" of 3 hours. In any case, would the ACo agree in LM giving points for such a championship???
|
||
|
28 Mar 2005, 08:02 (Ref:1263349) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
|
brielga pointed out the main difference between the 2 series : LMES is more "long endurance races" while FIA gt stay with sprint races (+/- half length)
|
||
__________________
bernard |
28 Mar 2005, 10:21 (Ref:1263391) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
I realise that it would be great to see everyone co-opperateing together . But I remember when the Fia got involved with Le Mans before . Le Mans started the LMES so they should be let run it the way they want too . Otherwise we could have all kinds of crap again . Anyway , as mentioned above . Lmes is about endurance while the Fia GT is more about sprint racing .
If is isnt broken ..... leave it alone I think . |
||
|
28 Mar 2005, 10:30 (Ref:1263396) | #24 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
Quote:
nothing against safety rules here, don't take me wrong on this |
|||
|
28 Mar 2005, 10:44 (Ref:1263406) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
those would have happend . even without FIA .
on the subject .. at the moment . both series look strong . with good grids . .so i don't see the need |
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travelling to Spa (Merge) | Gaz | Trackside | 54 | 8 Jul 2009 08:02 |
Silverstone F1 Testing [merge] | Osella | Trackside | 53 | 27 Feb 2006 19:30 |
IRL & CHAMP CAR Should They Merge? | Xpunk75 | IRL Indycar Series | 14 | 16 Mar 2005 06:11 |