F1's 2017 rising stars analysis

[Razzzor]

There's quite a lot of young talent in F1 at the moment, in particular with far more experienced team mates. So we're ending up with a lot of these young guys fighting each other in the mid/back field. I find it very interesting watching these guys, because in 5-10 years time some of them could be at the front of the field battling the likes of Ricciardo, Verstappen (who's still almost a youngster himself) etc. So I thought I'd make up a thread so we can discuss their performances post-race.

Ocon: paired with Perez who's really come on strong the last two years and become a bit of Frentzen in being able to outperform mid-field machinery. So to have three consecutive 10th place finishes and really not that far behind Perez in each race is very good so far. He even beat him in qualifying at Bahrain, although I think Perez might have not got his fast lap in. Certainly best of the new guys so far, which is surprising as he only had 3 starts last year and F3 to GP3 to DTM is a unique way to enter F1. I thought DTM would spell the end of his F1 hopes especially when he was sitting dead plum last in points before his F1 call-up. But good job so far.

Vandoorne: paired with Alonso it's going to be easy to see how good he is if he can get anywhere close to Alonso regularly. Unfortunately last in round one (I think he had some car issues), retirement in round two and then DNS in round three. We've hardly had a chance to see his skill thus far. But if qualifying is anything to go by, he's getting closer: 1 second, 0.5s, 0.3s. I hope the paddock don't forget his skill level because of the dud McLaren.

Palmer: paired with Hulk, very equal in talent with Perez so against another good comparison, especially as Hulk has been very good so far this year. Palmer looked terrible at Australia, but they fixed the issue for round two although it still only saw him 18th on the grid ahead of Max with issues and Ocon. Meanwhile Hulk is up in 7th. But Hulk had a terrible race and they finished 12-13, not so bad. Come China he finally starts showing some promise by making the top 10, although 1.2sec down on Hulkenburg 7th to 10th. I guess Palmer must have used all his good tyres up just getting there. But in the race he spent all day battling Kyvat, Ericsson, Alonso, maybe even Ocon and Wehrlein had featured around the mid-field battle. But ultimately they all somehow passed him and he ended up dead last. Hulkenburg in 9th. He did have front wing damage, don't know if they ever changed it (probably not) so it could have effected performance, but it was his own fault in mis-judging a pass. I still haven't given up on Palmer on being a good solid driver, his GP2 championship was strong and DAMS haven't been real contenders since. Even Rowland probably won't do what Palmer did in that team.

Magnussen: paired with Grosjean. Does anyone want to take a stab on who's best between Perez, Hulk and Grosjean? They're all great drivers. Magnussen and Palmer didn't stand out at Renault last year and the car was unreliable so hard to compare them. But now we can with Magnussen up against Grosjean. Qualifying, 1.4sec in Australia to Grosjean, but Magnussen actually out-qualified him in round two, but it was back to the rear at Bahrain while Grosjean was up in 9th. Apparently Kev didn't get his fast lap in because of the flags caused by Sainz. In terms of race results, they both DNF'd Australia, Magnussen was a standout at China taking 8th with Grosjean back in 11th, Magnussen again DNF'd Bahrain so it's hard to judge his performances so far based on one good result. I still think he's a good driver.

Stroll: paired with the "old retiree" as the commentators love to call him. Completely out of his league at Australia, over 2sec down on Massa and crashing in the race if I remember rightly (and qualifying or practise, much to everyones amusement). Started 10th in China, 1.2sec down on Massa, but another DNF. He looked okay again Bahrain, qualifying 12th although that ended up being 1.1 down on Massa's final lap. This time his crash in the race was 100% Sainz Jr's fault. Getting better for the pay driver but Williams is the fourth best car so he should be doing what Ocon is doing.

Wehrlein: well we're not spoilt with pairing him with Ericsson, in my opinion the weakest driver in the field. If Wehrlein can't beat him, he shouldn't be in F1. And after pulling out of the first two rounds he's probably lost some fans. 0.6s faster than Ericsson in quali, 11th in the race beating Kyvat, Palmer, Alonso. He was ahead of Ericsson before his teammate retired. Decent result for his first race of the season. Sauber only managed two finishes better than that in 2016 - 9th for Nasr, 11th for Ericsson.

Giovanazzi: his race one performance was great, but I think he pretty much ended his F1 career in China with multiple crashes. Poor Gio, but hey he's got more experience than Stroll who came straight from F3, same goes for Verstappen, Kyvat, Bottas when they first entered F1. Giovanazzi was nearly GP2 champion last year. He'll be lost in the WEC classes now.

Those are my thoughts on the first 3 races. Ocon standing out the most just from consistency, although he hasn't beaten his team mate yet. All the others have had to deal with DNFs.

[mikuni]

My two cents on your post above:
To answer your question I really rate Grosjean, but he needs to keep his head together. He is one of those drivers, and there's a fair few on F1 at the moment, when things aren't going that well seem to fall to pieces completely, rather than just trucking on and getting a solid finish.

And I don't think (hope at least) that this will be the last we see of Giovinazzi. He showed huge promise in Australia and everyone was talking about him and almost writing of Wehrlein. A bad weekend and AG is gone forever? I really hope not. I'd st least like to see him get another test with Ferrari, or perhaps a Sauber seat next year to see what he's got. He was under such huge pressure to do something special after Australia I think it must have got to him. A driver needs at least a season to build with a team to prove themselves. Usually two.

And Palmer. I'm not sure on this boy. He had a crap car last year but struggled to match his team mate. This year with a much improved car it is just not looking good for him so far. I know he has had issues getting the car set up, and with the broken ARB in Australia, but he needs to do something good soon.

[S griffin]

Ocon is showing well so far, certainly being consistently not far off Perez, shows he's taking the right approach so far. Didn't he give Max a good run in F3?

Vandoorne's talent is being wasted with that Honda engine so far. A great character who deserves better

Palmer is certainly competent enough for F1, but seems to be missing that final bit that separates the good from the very good. Up against a team mate as talented as the Hulk is not going to be easy either

Magnussen off track preparation has been questioned, but on the track he is doing well, especially in China. He should be around for a few seasons yet

Stroll, well you've got to break a few eggs to make an omelette. You can't be F3 champion without talent and he has got it. He seems to be learning from mistakes and can only get better. The fact he's got a rejuvenated Massa as team mate could help him

Wehrlein, after all the gossip over his fitness which forced him to miss the first couple of races, he responded in the best way possible, with a great drive to 11th after getting into Q2

Giovinazzi will surely be back, he's good enough not to be left on the sidelines. A couple of mistakes in China, but other rising stars have had weekends when they were young when they kept making mistakes

[BSchneiderFan]

For me, the big question is, will any of the "up and coming" youngsters be a major star, or will they be among the ranks of the journeymen on whom F1 relies? I think Vandoorne and Ocon have real potential; the jury's out on Stroll but I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment; I think the others will shuttle between mid-grid teams unless they somehow end up in a dominant car.

[chunterer]

Originally Posted by BSchneiderFan

For me, the big question is, will any of the "up and coming" youngsters be a major star, or will they be among the ranks of the journeymen on whom F1 relies? I think Vandoorne and Ocon have real potential; the jury's out on Stroll but I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment; I think the others will shuttle between mid-grid teams unless they somehow end up in a dominant car.

Tend to agree BSF. Nowadays it's more about opportunity arising as much as it is about god given talent.

Be interesting to see how Ocon and Wehrlein compare at the end of the year. Ocon has started well at Force India relative to Checo, but Pascal illustrated he is still very serious about his career last weekend.

If they impress regularly it is not inconceivable that they could still end up as the Mercedes pairing in a couple if yesrs.

[wolfhound]

If you look at the midfield teams of Renault, Force India and Williams all of whom have a young driver and a well established good driver.
( Mclaren should also be in this bunch but with all the problems it is difficult to judge Vandoorne).
Force India are the team that is scoring well because their young driver is close to the pace of his more experienced team mate.

[Razzzor]

Looks like Ocon does it again, best of the young guys and only 8 seconds behind his team mate. Only a tenth off in qualy.

Vandoorne couldn't get close to Alonso in qualifying but at least finished a race, finally. Did he end up making the one strategy to the end?
No doesn't look like he did, he stopped again on lap 24. Odd. Good to finish ahead of Saubers and not last, they did the same strategy as him.

Stroll got back up to 11th which is okay considering he was backwards on the lap one. Still 20 seconds behind Massa who had to do an extra pit stop at the end. He got back in front of a lot of teams, not bad for the guy everyone considers the weakest new entrant.

Palmer taken out on lap one by Grosjean, (and I'd consider that more Grosjean fault than Palmers). But in qualy he was almost a second down on Hulk. 8th vs 16th. That's really poor and he should be closer on one lap pace than this.

Wehrlein beat Ericsson in qualy but finished last, a long way behind the race. I'm not sure what the reason is for this but he must have had some issues. He was running ahead of Ericsson until lap 20, stayed with him after the pit stops but then steadily started dropping late in the race.

And that leaves Magnussen, who easily outqualified Grosjean to make q2, 1.2sec faster! In the race that only meant 13th, only finishing ahead of the slower two-stoppers.

[S griffin]

Ocon is certainly one for the future and is getting better and better

[chillibowl]

i didnt really see it well....was Stroll's spin forced or unforced?

Ocon, from what little i saw, seemed to be doing really well all day.

[Aysedasi]

Originally Posted by chillibowl

i didnt really see it well....was Stroll's spin forced or unforced?

Seemed unforced to me.

[crmalcolm]

Originally Posted by chillibowl

i didnt really see it well....was Stroll's spin forced or unforced?

Definitely unforced, Williams aren't mentioning any other car involved.

'On Lance's side, he had an unfortunate spin very early on, but drove a good, solid race after that and narrowly missed out on the points.'

'I got squeezed on the kerb, there wasn’t much grip and the car just got away from me. I knew I didn’t have any damage,'

[chunterer]

How much money will the difference be between the Stroll funding to have stroll in the car versus the money earning points that Lance is not generating when Massa is doing it because they have a pretty good package this year?

[BSchneiderFan]

If you'd told Ocon he'd finish the first four races in the points, I think he'd have been more than happy with that. Barcelona might be a bit more of a challenge, with Renault and Williams and Toro Rosso in the mix behind the top three, but then it's Monaco, where anything can happen (and, to quote the great Murray Walker, it usually does).

[S griffin]

Give Stroll time, he's only just finished for the first time and one of his DNFs was not his fault, i.e. Bahrain

[Razzzor]

Ocon doing another great job 5th. Not far behind Perez either, although it is still behind.

Wehrlein great job in 7th (8th with penalty). Sauber did have a good day with Marcus Ericsson up there in 11th as well.

Magnussen was doing well in the points, ahead of Grosjean. But then he hit Kyvat and ruined that good run.

Palmer, Stroll, Vandoorne - what are you guys doing out there?
Stoffel's fastest lap is 3.8 seconds slower than Alonso's. WTF?
Stroll looked hopeless and as the commentators were saying, that car shouldn't be in battle with the Saubers.
Palmer 15th vs Hulk in 6th. That's replacement territory Jolyon.

If Leclerc keeps this performance up in GP2, someone will make a seat for him in F1 next year. Could be Magnussen (since he's linked to Haas) could be Palmer.

[BertMk2]

Originally Posted by Razzzor

Palmer, Stroll, Vandoorne - what are you guys doing out there?
Stoffel's fastest lap is 3.8 seconds slower than Alonso's. WTF?
Stroll looked hopeless and as the commentators were saying, that car shouldn't be in battle with the Saubers.
Palmer 15th vs Hulk in 6th. That's replacement territory Jolyon.

They're all looking a bit shoddy aren't they? Vandoorne is the surprise - Alonso's good but that difference can't all be driver can it? Different engine modes?

Stroll should in theory have been better around Barcelona as that's a track he knows. Given Strolls pace you can see why Williams were on the phone to Massa when Bottas jumped ship.

Palmer struggled last year but that could have been car - he doesn't have that excuse this season. He looked a bit shell shocked after qualifying and really does appear to be on the ropes - I doubt he'll get a 3rd season in F1

[Neppatsrev Xam]

Originally Posted by Razzzor

If Leclerc keeps this performance up in GP2, someone will make a seat for him in F1 next year. Could be Magnussen (since he's linked to Haas) could be Palmer.

Leclerc is testing for Haas because he is a Ferrari junior driver.

http://fda.ferrari.com/en/main-drivers/charles-leclerc/

[Beryl]

Originally Posted by Razzzor

Stoffel's fastest lap is 3.8 seconds slower than Alonso's. WTF?

To be fair, Vandoorne had a faster best lap at the time of his (self-created) retirement than Alonso did. Alonso improved his lap times at the very end with low fuel, fresh soft tires and possibly higher engine modes. Alonso was marginally faster in the race, but the difference in fastest laps is misleading.

[Razzzor]

Stoffel was finally on course for redemption wasn't he? A great qualifying, ahead of Button, until he wrecked. But a good race and keeping Hamilton within 5 seconds for most of the race. Then he wrecked. Makes you wonder what Fred might have done in that car, maybe 6th?

That just left son of Jan to be best of the new guys, still ending up with a point even though he had to make a second pit stop. He was behind Grosjean though for most of the race.

Wehrlein average although I thought he would have been strong at Monaco.

Stroll at the back, Williams seemed to struggle.

Palmer a second off Hulk in qualifying continues to disappoint.

Ocon finally brought his string of great performances to an end, although it's hard to know what race pace he might have had when you qualify 16th. But yeah his qualy wasn't impressive.

No standouts for Monaco then. Well I guess Vandoorne if you can forgive his crashes. The one in the race was a bit unlucky.

[gert]

I think Palmer and Stroll should have more or less equal machinery as their teammates.

Not so sure about Vandoorne, considering the problematic Honda engines.
Since even Honda themselves seem to have no cue why it sometimes works and sometimes doesn't, it's hard to tell whatever performance difference is caused by driver, car or engine.

I think we can only judge Stoffel once Honda has its stuff sorted.

Driving into Massa was very stupid, though.

[BSchneiderFan]

Stroll has disappointed so far. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, and he's certainly had some bad luck, but he's not showing well against Massa.

[chillibowl]

Originally Posted by BSchneiderFan

Stroll has disappointed so far. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, and he's certainly had some bad luck, but he's not showing well against Massa.

some bad luck for sure but (just my perception ) he doesn't seem to be showing any tangible signs of improvement nor any real hunger to do so either.

of course perception can be far from reality though.

[S griffin]

Ocon, when will his run end? He's on a real roll

Wehrlein has really shown he's a potential star of the future, with another good drive to 7th on the road

Magnussen was doing so well till he threw it all away with that contact with Kyvat

To me experience counts in these new cars, which is why Stoffel, Jolyon and Lance are someway off their teammates. But Stoffel doing a Schumacher Jerez on Massa was silly

[S griffin]

Vandoorne drove probably his best in Monaco. The Q2 incident was unfortunate, but he still had done enough to get into Q3. He was holding his own and if there hadn't
been that SC, he would't have had that incident with Perez#

Magnussen wouldn't have got that point, if there hadn't been that ridiculous SC free pass rule

Wehrlein and Stroll were unimpressive. Palmer tried to just cruise around and collect points like his father did on street circuits, but there weren't enough cars to retire

Ocon bad weekend, but he's allowed an off weekend

[RWill2073]

Never heard a more sad radio comment than stroll saying "please help me" to his crew. I asked in the race thread, but do y'all think he even wants to be there or does his daddy want him him there?