Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Baltic Touring Car Championship Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Touring Car Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 Mar 2007, 23:50 (Ref:1873494)   #1
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Old car=winner?

An intersting comment was brought up by another member.

Should an older car be able to win a championship? What about a single race? Would it be bad if a 2 or more year old car wins a race?
What's the oldest age of veh that should be able to win a race? I feel it would be bad if a car over 5 years could win a race against the latest spec machinery?

Last edited by kmchow; 21 Mar 2007 at 23:55.
kmchow is offline  
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever...
Quote
Old 21 Mar 2007, 23:54 (Ref:1873496)   #2
flor
Veteran
 
flor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location:
europe
Posts: 1,622
flor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridflor should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i would have absolutely no problem with 1 or 2 year old cars winning races, manufacturers probably would though.
flor is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Mar 2007, 14:06 (Ref:1873771)   #3
Tim Wilkinson
Veteran
 
Tim Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 782
Tim Wilkinson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Which championship are we talking about?

In one where the rules remain static, then innovation and technological advancement should mean that the latest models would win. If they don't then that's not a problem for the organisers, but for the manufacturers and teams running the latest cars that aren't up to the standard of previous years.

BTCC is a different matter, though, as there are cars running to what are effectively two sets of regulations. In my opinion the age there isn't important (see above, if a 2004 S2000 BMW can beat a 2007 Seat then good for them as they're both built to the same regs) but the different specs are. Rather than try and run the two specs parallel and make one ineligible for overall victory, why aren't the two run as seperate classes (as the handover from Group A to 2l ST rules) and the BTC-spec cars ballasted so that they run behind the newer models, yet still allow privateers on smaller budgets to be involved inthe championship?
Tim Wilkinson is offline  
__________________
If you want to get a hat, get a head.
Quote
Old 22 Mar 2007, 16:13 (Ref:1873832)   #4
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
To clarify and be a bit fairer, let's say there's only a single class of racing cars. Should a S2000 '04 BMW be able to beat a '07 Seat?

In the DTM, they've tried to encourage that by giving the older spec DTM cars decr minimum base weights based on age.

But I agree, most manufacturers would have a problem if their older cars are winning against their newer ones. They obviously have a lesser problem if their older spec car beats another brand.
kmchow is offline  
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever...
Quote
Old 27 Mar 2007, 00:20 (Ref:1877246)   #5
Smokey 6 litre
Veteran
 
Smokey 6 litre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
The Total Perspective Vortex
Posts: 1,707
Smokey 6 litre should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
will technical progression newer cars should always be quicker, otherwise the teams wouldn't bother developing their models.
But there will always be stunning drives, unpredicatable conditions, and pure luck that could see an older car win a race, but with the vast resources of the manufacturers put into testing, devlopment, the best drivers and (in the WTCC, BTCC, DTM) running 3 cars or more, it would be impossible to stage a competative chapionship challenge with a car even a year old.
The possible exception to this could be the WSR MG's in the BTCC, a 4 year old chassis managing numerous race wins, but that car still had serious development potential but still couldn't win for the title. WSR obviosuly felt that a newer car was needed to challenge for the title next year (S2000 rules obviously forced this but it probly would've happened anyway)
Smokey 6 litre is offline  
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now"
Douglas Adams. 1952-2001
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The next new winner Kicking-back Formula One 72 13 Jan 2005 20:38
the winner beau Formula One 19 20 Jul 2003 09:15
And the Winner is... macdaddy ChampCar World Series 6 28 Oct 2002 11:25


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.