Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 Dec 2002, 04:43 (Ref:449596)   #1
nsxr
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 328
nsxr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
'05 rule idea

why run a turbo 4 motor it workrd for f1 in the past maybe have run say 750-1000hp with a 45cm inlet restrictor with a single turbo maker for all manufactors the idea of control parts say gearboxes electronics and other minor yet pricy items oh with the smaller motor maybe it could be good for the safety they could put the driver futher back in the car? just a thought
nsxr is offline  
__________________
"sicken your mind and your driving will follow" Klaus "the King" Ludwig
Old 14 Dec 2002, 06:21 (Ref:449626)   #2
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Most of the turbo engines in F1 were V6s or V8s.

A stock-block straight four is barely smaller than a purebred CART V8.

Thanks for contributing, though... It's always good to get more people in on the discussion.

BTW, _please_ try to use some punctuation...
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 15 Dec 2002, 12:20 (Ref:450342)   #3
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm not sure that many of the turbo's used in F1 were V8s, maybe the Alfa Romeo one?

The BMW turbo was a 4 cylinder.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Old 15 Dec 2002, 12:56 (Ref:450367)   #4
SteveA
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location:
UK
Posts: 94
SteveA should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
A V4 engine would be shorter than a V8!
SteveA is offline  
Old 15 Dec 2002, 14:37 (Ref:450411)   #5
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Uhm... Nobody makes a V4, except maybe for motorcycles.

Subaru alone makes a flat-four. All others are inline.

In F1, during the turbo era, Honda, Porsche, Ferrari, Ford, Motori Moderni, and Renault used V6s, so yeah, I stand corrected, no V8s that I could find evidence of.

Hart and BMW used 4-cylinders (The Megatron was simply a BMW re-branded once BMW had halted their factory involvement).

Last edited by Lee Janotta; 15 Dec 2002 at 14:42.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Old 15 Dec 2002, 20:03 (Ref:450581)   #6
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Lee Janotta
Uhm... Nobody makes a V4, except maybe for motorcycles.
Lancia used a narrow angle V4 in some of their cars until FIAT took over the company. Also Ford and Saab in the 1960's(?), but I don't think there are currently any V4 cars being made:
http://www.fulvia.nl/pages/enginec.htm

Quote:
Subaru alone makes a flat-four. All others are inline.
Currently you might be right. Lancia (Gamma etc), VW, Porsche (914 etc), Alfa Romeo (Alfasud/33/145/146) have all used this configuration in the past (1990's for Alfa Romeo).

Quote:
In F1, during the turbo era, Honda, Porsche, Ferrari, Ford, Motori Moderni, and Renault used V6s, so yeah, I stand corrected, no V8s that I could find evidence of.[/B]
Alfa Romeo 182T, 183T etc used 1.5 L V8 Turbo. Best result was a couple of second places for de Cesaris. I think Osella also used the same engine.
http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/con-alfa.html
http://www.bnw4u.de/~wernheye/Deutsch/AlfaF1.html

Alfa were also working on a in-line 4 (had running prototype) at the time of the FIAT takeover, but FIAT wanted only one of their car companies (Ferrari) in F1, so the project was canned.

Agree about V8 not being much larger than an in-line four. For the same capacity the smaller bores would mean a shorter cylinder head and shorter stroke should mean a lower engine.

If you want to reduce cost you need to control the physical dimensions. i.e. don't let the engine builders play around with 90, 80 and 75degree V8's. Tell them it has to be 90degree with certain bore spacing and regulate the engine and transmission mounting points so there is (almost) no need to redesign the car to take next years engine..... or another suppliers engine.

Last edited by alfasud; 15 Dec 2002 at 20:05.
alfasud is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
107% rule roys1 Formula One 5 20 Mar 2005 12:59
An Idea............. DanJR1 National & International Single Seaters 7 7 Jun 2003 10:14
The FIA rule eatapc Formula One 24 27 Jun 2001 22:40
An Idea Raoul Duke Formula One 18 8 Jun 2001 15:04


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.