|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Aug 2004, 15:03 (Ref:1067118) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Ross Brawn's Qualifying System Suggestion
Did anyone else notice this in the ITV coverage? Apparently Ross BRawn has sugegsted a system with a 12-lap 60-minute session, with the twist that, after each 15 minute period, the slowest 5 cars are eliminated. This would force people to put a lap in earlier, and encourage them to save laps for later, and should produce the odd surprise. What do you all think about it?
|
||
|
15 Aug 2004, 15:13 (Ref:1067130) | #2 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
personally no quly system is good enough to mix the field up.... the 2002 format was also good but the fact remains the fastest guys will always be at the front unless you wet the track artificially when they run...
i think the FIA and teams should concentrate more on trying to close the gap to Ferrari si that the other teams can challenge Ferrari... then go back to any quly system you want and they will be exciting |
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
15 Aug 2004, 15:17 (Ref:1067134) | #3 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
You miss the point here ralfy. We don't want a qualifying system that necessarily mixes the grid. We just want a qualifying system that is entertaining to watch ie - unlimited, low fuel, sticky tyre runs.
Brawns system is interesting........not sure it'd woirk without all and sundry complaining though. |
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 15:22 (Ref:1067140) | #4 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,676
|
Exactly. Why make it false? Just open the gates and make em find their own room. 1 hour on Friday and one on Saturday. Fastes time counts. Hmm. Getting a feeling of De Ja Vu here.
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
15 Aug 2004, 15:27 (Ref:1067144) | #5 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
agree qith you guys low fuel, new tyres and let them fly... i personally didnt mind that the big guns did not go out for the first 25 mins in the old way
|
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
15 Aug 2004, 15:40 (Ref:1067153) | #6 | |||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 403
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Aug 2004, 17:25 (Ref:1067208) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
2 one-hour sessions didn't work when it was dry on Friday and wet on Saturday, as it meant the TV viewers didn't get any meaning ful action. And while oyu might not get bored staring at a largely-empty track for 25 minutes, a lot of casual viewers did. Like it or not, 1-lap qualifying really boosted viewing figures last year. It was a new idea, just like what Ross is suggesting.
|
||
|
15 Aug 2004, 17:27 (Ref:1067209) | #8 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
1 lap qualifying - a single session with low fuel. Go out in the order of finishing the last race. Simple.
|
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 17:29 (Ref:1067211) | #9 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,192
|
1 session, fastest driver gets pole. Simpler?
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
15 Aug 2004, 17:31 (Ref:1067214) | #10 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
I'd rather see everyone's lap though.
|
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 17:53 (Ref:1067239) | #11 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,192
|
I know this is the same old stuff that we always go over, but I prefer everyone to be able to respond. (we are agreed on low fuel, so that is the main difference I guess). You can save all the in cars for analysis afterwards and enjoy the real tension of the session unfold.
As for Ross' idea. It's OK. Certainly worth considering. It might get four nail biters as people on the cusp need to make sure there in the next fifteen minutes. Also it will make sure everyone goes out early too. In addition the Minardi and lower grid lot still get coverage (if the director is half sensible) because that will be where the action is at the end of the first fifteen minutes. Then the mid field get their coverage. Then towards the end the front of the grid wet-your-pants-balls-out-shots for ultimate glory. (did I over-sell that?) |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
15 Aug 2004, 17:53 (Ref:1067240) | #12 | ||||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,676
|
Quote:
Quote:
Let's get real here. MS can do the one shot quali. He can do the laps in 1 hour. Anything they bring in will be meat and gravy to him, so go back to best of two hours, big slicks, qualifying tyres and balls out motoring. |
||||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
15 Aug 2004, 18:09 (Ref:1067275) | #13 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,192
|
Quote:
Why not go back to the old system. All sessions count? |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
15 Aug 2004, 18:20 (Ref:1067288) | #14 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Oh come on!
F1 needs televison. I know it's great to think of the romance of the "golden age" but the vast majority of fans want to see the action that matters on their television. |
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 18:30 (Ref:1067295) | #15 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,676
|
KB. I have an impression of you but I can't share it here.
The point is that TV is one thing and we all (including you) complain of the state of the show. And then someone says its a sport and all of a sudden you get all (we need tv etc.) Well "WE" don't. "WE" want to see racing as it should be. All we get now is manufactured and pious people like you saying it's good. As I said elsewhere, I've got to go into my office tomorrow and tell a guy who loves football (and never stops telling me how good it is) that what we saw today was a great race. I can't and I won't and I'm seriously embarrassed for my chosen sport. Come up with something better or stop trying to convince me. One or the other. (Just a note here. I've never found a GP to make me so negative before). |
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
15 Aug 2004, 18:35 (Ref:1067299) | #16 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Calm down Pete, mate!
One thing that worries me about the possible re-introduction of the qualifying system we all loved is that will it work in conjunction with the one engine for two (or even three) race weekend rules? Will anyone go out more than say once or twice? Still, I suppose even that would be better than the compromise we suffer currently. |
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 18:42 (Ref:1067304) | #17 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,676
|
Calm as the proverbial.
How many engines do you think they had in (say) 1978? They were pushed for two for each car.! |
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
15 Aug 2004, 18:47 (Ref:1067307) | #18 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
But they weren't penalised ten places on the grid in an era where it is seemingly impossible to overtake!
|
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 19:01 (Ref:1067311) | #19 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,676
|
I rest my case.
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
15 Aug 2004, 19:07 (Ref:1067320) | #20 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
I'm sure it's not accurate |
||
|
15 Aug 2004, 19:21 (Ref:1067331) | #21 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,676
|
Now I know it is!
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
15 Aug 2004, 19:24 (Ref:1067333) | #22 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
I thought you might!
|
|
|
15 Aug 2004, 19:35 (Ref:1067342) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,727
|
Quote:
Unless you happened to live somewhere where the friday qualifying session ... I remember in the mid 90s we had to switch (because of commercial breaks) between dutch RTL, german RTL, eurosport and BBC; And on the BBC, the commentators had to explain to the public what had happened during the friday qualifying session (which they did not broadcast at the time). |
||
|
15 Aug 2004, 20:33 (Ref:1067398) | #24 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 292
|
Why not run a Super Pole type system.
heres the plan..... A couple of hours running on friday. One Hour on Saturday, and then run a one lap/one car system with race fuel. Easy enough to understand for punters and teams alike. |
|
|
16 Aug 2004, 07:04 (Ref:1067798) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,951
|
I give Ross Brawn's suggestion my full thumbs up. It WILL give viewers a spectacle, with the last 15min periods being very crazy. It would work, too.
|
||
__________________
Part time wingman, full time spud. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
qualifying suggestion | DKGandBH | Formula One | 26 | 22 Aug 2004 04:45 |
The Purnell/F1 Racing Qualifying System | T0MAT01 | Formula One | 22 | 20 Aug 2004 04:02 |
New Qualifying System from British GP onwards...! (merged) | Sodemo | Formula One | 45 | 28 Jun 2004 17:59 |
Bernie Disagerees with New Qualifying System | BootsOntheSide | Formula One | 33 | 28 Mar 2003 18:43 |
New qualifying system. Confusing!!!!!!!!! | pink69 | Touring Car Racing | 2 | 4 Apr 2002 23:10 |