|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Jun 2004, 18:40 (Ref:1016868) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
There is a difference between "dumbing down" and being sensible.
Any series where you are spending $200 million per season just to have a chance to be halfway competitive is in serious trouble. I mean, are these teams spending it because they can or is it really necessary? Additionally if Minardi spends $30 million and Ferrari $300 million, shouldn't Minardi be more than 4.5 seconds slower? I mean, ten times the outlay should buy me more than a 4 second per lap gap! I wonder how much is really spent on the cars. Maybe I am ahead of my time or completely off base, but I cannot understand how no one else seems to think that this level of spending is not some sort of problem. There has to be a median level somewhere that would allow competition, innovation and easier access for new teams without having to somehow come up with $200 million plus to do it. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine Parity | MarkG | Club Level Single Seaters | 107 | 30 Jul 2005 09:13 |
Parity.... | tiko | Australasian Touring Cars. | 8 | 25 Jul 2005 00:46 |
parity | rocket | Australasian Touring Cars. | 32 | 14 Jan 2003 13:49 |
V8 Supercar Parity | Troy | Touring Car Racing | 16 | 10 May 2000 22:22 |