|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
25 Jul 2002, 22:55 (Ref:342925) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 952
|
Project Blueprint
I have been reading in mainly the specialist media lately, that a lot of Ford fans are opposed to giving the Commodore the Falcons front end, saying that they are already dominating so why do they need the Falcons superior front suspension.
Has anyone thought about the opposite though. On paper the Falcon has a supposedly better designed front end, but in practice it seems very inconsistant. This could be due to an aero effect but lets assume that it is basically due to the mechanical design. Thus, when the Commodore gets this front end, might we see the same inconsistancy appear with them? It is food for thought isn't it. |
||
__________________
Ego, is not a dirty word |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Project Blueprint 2005 | Rock hard Yogi | Australasian Touring Cars. | 21 | 26 Jan 2005 02:01 |
Project Blueprint 12months on | TSR | Australasian Touring Cars. | 10 | 1 Dec 2003 02:53 |
Project Blueprint | yendor | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 29 May 2003 02:43 |
Project Blueprint | Pure GT | Australasian Touring Cars. | 48 | 18 Jan 2003 04:11 |
Pukekohe Demonstrates Project Blueprint | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 12 | 14 Nov 2002 21:30 |