|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
5 Sep 2015, 14:46 (Ref:3571546)
|
#11 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,108
  |
Was the FW16 really such a dog? All of the cars suffered from the lack of electronic aids in 1994. The only car which didn't was the Benetton, which was later found to have some driver aids still installed. If the only car the FW16 couldn't beat was the B194, and the B194 was illegal, it says the FW16 wasn't that bad and that the cars that year were just difficult to drive in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Rules] Are more rule changes necessary ? | Marbot | Formula One | 51 | 27 Sep 2009 17:19 |
| F1 future rule changes | TheNewBob | Formula One | 57 | 20 Dec 2006 09:19 |
| Sensible ideas for future technical regs anyone?/Rule changes - more to come [merged] | AMT | Formula One | 74 | 12 Nov 2002 16:09 |
| Future Tourer Future | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 17 Jul 2002 23:01 |
Threaded Mode