|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Jun 2024, 21:05 (Ref:4212073) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,017
|
With 30% less downforce, those who think less downforce will make for better racing ought to be pleased?
The X-mode and Z-mode (lol) seem like a half measure compared to more sophisticated continuously variable wing levels that could be mapped in software, and thus make aero software a real battleground. It does have a whiff of "a camel is a horse designed by committee." It seems like it keeps some 2022 ideas while it also reverts to some older ideas (rear wing endplates return, part flat floor) -- it all seems like a compromise. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Rules] Are more rule changes necessary ? | Marbot | Formula One | 51 | 27 Sep 2009 17:19 |
F1 future rule changes | TheNewBob | Formula One | 57 | 20 Dec 2006 09:19 |
Sensible ideas for future technical regs anyone?/Rule changes - more to come [merged] | AMT | Formula One | 74 | 12 Nov 2002 16:09 |
Future Tourer Future | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 17 Jul 2002 23:01 |