Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 Jun 2013, 18:36 (Ref:3269669)   #1
Bomber604
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
England
Telford
Posts: 48
Bomber604 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Engine oil viscosity change?

I'm looking to eak a couple more horses from my 1.8ltr 4 pot dohc 16v engine which is already built to the max spec allowed in my championship.

Currently running 10w50 Morris's X-RPM fully synth competition oil as recommended by the engine builder.

Engine has covered 400 miles over roughly 8 hours since build under testing & race conditions without missing a beat.

My question is this, will running a thinner oil i.e. 5w40 (fully synth) reduce internal drag/frictional losses sufficiantly to release any more power without putting the engine at risk of damage?
Bomber604 is offline  
__________________
Onwards & Upwards :-)
Quote
Old 25 Jun 2013, 22:53 (Ref:3269767)   #2
GORDON STREETER
Veteran
 
GORDON STREETER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Spain
Kent+Mojacar Spain, but not always ?
Posts: 9,446
GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!
Running an engine on a thinner oil will produce more power through reducing frictional losses and using less power to drive the oil pump. It normally drops the oil pressure as well.
However as to "how much" you won't know unless it's tested on a test bed as a rolling road isn't accurate enough, and you won't notice any "massive" difference.
I would have thought that there is no problem in running a fully synthetic oil that is recomended by the original engine manufacturers regardless of the state of tune.
The only problem that could arise is if it has a failure then your engine builder will not have anything to do with it regardless of if the "problem" has anything to do with the oil at all.

Last edited by GORDON STREETER; 25 Jun 2013 at 22:59.
GORDON STREETER is offline  
__________________
Balls of steel (knob of butter) They're Asking For Larkins. ( Proper beer) not you're Eurofizz crap. Hace más calor en España. Me han conocido a hablar un montón cojones! Send any cheques and cash to PO box 1 Lagos Nigeria Africa !
Quote
Old 26 Jun 2013, 05:56 (Ref:3269840)   #3
Notso Swift
Veteran
 
Notso Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
United Nations
37deg 46'52.36" S 144deg 59' 01.83"E
Posts: 1,943
Notso Swift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by GORDON STREETER View Post
Running an engine on a thinner oil will produce more power through reducing frictional losses and using less power to drive the oil pump. It normally drops the oil pressure as well.
However as to "how much" you won't know unless it's tested on a test bed as a rolling road isn't accurate enough, and you won't notice any "massive" difference.
I would have thought that there is no problem in running a fully synthetic oil that is recomended by the original engine manufacturers regardless of the state of tune.
The only problem that could arise is if it has a failure then your engine builder will not have anything to do with it regardless of if the "problem" has anything to do with the oil at all.
Yes, but only a the specific rpm before the relief valve opens, because the if the valve is set at (say) 60psi and was opening at 3000 rpm (remembering the oil pump is 99% chance going to be a positive displacement pump so it is pretty much proportional in output to speed) it may now open at 3500 rpm.
The thinner oil has a higher flow, so you have increased volume for the same pressure (same volume at same speed, though)

I was once told by a powerplant engineer I race with to "Always use the thinnest oil you can, but not too thin!"

Other things to consider, the "rule of thumb is you need 10psi per 1000 rpm", but of course like all of these rules the exceptions will kill your motor! (I reckon this rule was built around old 50/60's tolerance pushrod motors, not modern stuff)

I guess that doesn't help much but it may give you more to think about
Notso Swift is offline  
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive.
Quote
Old 28 Jun 2013, 17:57 (Ref:3271313)   #4
Al Weyman
Veteran
 
Al Weyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
England
South of Watford (just)
Posts: 14,699
Al Weyman has a real shot at the podium!Al Weyman has a real shot at the podium!Al Weyman has a real shot at the podium!Al Weyman has a real shot at the podium!
10psi per 1000rpm sounds like the old Chevy Small Block advice. I like to see a bit more at the lower revs as ticking over at 7 or 8 psi would be a tad worrying to me!
Al Weyman is offline  
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter!
Quote
Old 1 Jul 2013, 01:20 (Ref:3272171)   #5
Notso Swift
Veteran
 
Notso Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
United Nations
37deg 46'52.36" S 144deg 59' 01.83"E
Posts: 1,943
Notso Swift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Most likely it is SBC (and probably Mopar/Ford as well), a lot of "Race-lore" starts with that stuff

I think the peak as more what they are talking about, but don't discount the requirement for low load being significantly less, especially if the volume is good. Most of the pressure a bearing sees is created by the crank and wave of oil , not really that much to do with the system pressure, the system pressure is required to fill up the area behind the crank and replace the oil that has been lost out the sides.
Notso Swift is offline  
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive.
Quote
Old 4 Jul 2013, 03:59 (Ref:3273660)   #6
wnut
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!wnut has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber604 View Post
I'm looking to eak a couple more horses from my 1.8ltr 4 pot dohc 16v engine which is already built to the max spec allowed in my championship.

Currently running 10w50 Morris's X-RPM fully synth competition oil as recommended by the engine builder.

Engine has covered 400 miles over roughly 8 hours since build under testing & race conditions without missing a beat.

My question is this, will running a thinner oil i.e. 5w40 (fully synth) reduce internal drag/frictional losses sufficiantly to release any more power without putting the engine at risk of damage?
Speak to your chosen oil company's technical department, they will advise you what might help!

If they won't help you change your oil supplier!
wnut is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting engine oil pressure RICHARD.T Racing Technology 12 11 Oct 2011 03:11
engine oil johnny99 Racing Technology 58 25 Feb 2011 08:54
What engine oil do you use,and why? Robyn Slater Racing Technology 29 27 Oct 2006 06:38
Engine Oil Walshy Racing Technology 15 10 May 2005 06:55


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.