|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Nov 2006, 10:08 (Ref:1775133) | #26 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 370
|
Some say messy, I say purposeful. Some say clean and uncluttered, I say weedy and cheap.
Of recent times the FW26A is one of the best looking cars IMO. I'm sure people will disagree - but these people probably think the Jaguar E-type is the best looking road car ever From the past the Blue and White Turbo powered dart that was the BT-52 has to be one of the best IMO. |
||
__________________
So, after waiting 20 minutes for him to come out of the back of the garage, Matski asks "Are you going to get Jacques' seat then?" Robert replies "ha ha, I don't know!", signs Matksi's cap, and retreats to his motorhome. |
26 Nov 2006, 11:45 (Ref:1775212) | #27 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
But surely that is "weedy and cheap"?
(Oh no, sorry, it was BMW powered wasn't it) |
|
|
26 Nov 2006, 13:25 (Ref:1775278) | #28 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
As for the latest generation of F1 cars looking "purposeful".The antiquated champ cars look more so.The F1 cars look like they were designed by a commitee (which indeed they were ). It seems that the longer the rules stay the same,the worse an F1 car looks. Last edited by Marbot; 26 Nov 2006 at 13:27. |
||
|
26 Nov 2006, 14:38 (Ref:1775296) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
I actually really love the old Subaru STi shape, the 1997-2000 model was really aggressive looking, top stuff.
My father had one too as part of his "mid life crisis" period... bloody quick, never got to drive it though... |
||
|
26 Nov 2006, 14:39 (Ref:1775297) | #30 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Is purposeful beautiful? For me, purposeful means....well, it looks fit for its purpose. Doesn't mean it's good looking in my view.
A drag car looks purposeful, but it also looks rather ugly. A Ford Transit looks purposeful, but it is also a van. An Impreza looks purposeful, but it is also bland. |
|
|
26 Nov 2006, 15:50 (Ref:1775308) | #31 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,194
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
26 Nov 2006, 16:55 (Ref:1775323) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
The 1982 Ferrari 126 C2 is, for me, the most beautiful Formula 1 car ever.
Followed by the 1982 Lotus-Cosworth and 1990 Ferrari. http://www.awirz.ch/068dea.jpg http://f1gt.ifrance.com/images/GP/IMGP494b.jpg |
||
|
26 Nov 2006, 17:05 (Ref:1775326) | #33 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
Yes, a scooby looks purposeful, but I dislike cars that look as if the desingers involved just stuck with their first idea. There looks to be no refinement of the design theme.... and thats not to say that something that is refined has to look simple - just like not alot of thought has gone into it. I like detailing too, and the more simple something is the chances are it will have less details to pay attention to. |
|||
__________________
So, after waiting 20 minutes for him to come out of the back of the garage, Matski asks "Are you going to get Jacques' seat then?" Robert replies "ha ha, I don't know!", signs Matksi's cap, and retreats to his motorhome. |
26 Nov 2006, 17:45 (Ref:1775354) | #34 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,264
|
Last edited by Jimmy Magnusson; 26 Nov 2006 at 17:49. |
|
|
26 Nov 2006, 19:30 (Ref:1775395) | #35 | ||||
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Quote:
Good looking things do not follow any ideal, really. That is reserved for the ugly things. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
26 Nov 2006, 19:52 (Ref:1775408) | #36 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
The thing that really spoils the modern 98-on F1 car is the narrow track,it wasn't helped by the fact that the front wing didn't become narrower at the same time.I don't think I have got used to that yet.I'll have to give up watching Champ cars.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2006, 20:00 (Ref:1775415) | #37 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
The narrow track is a big visual problem, agreed. In racing car terms, F1 cars have the proportions of a double decker bus!
I still think the cars wouldn't look awesome though. I guess it depends how the rules shape things though. |
|
|
26 Nov 2006, 22:45 (Ref:1775492) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Cars need to be shorter and wider, not longer and narrower.
Most of the cars made after 1997 are truely hideous beasts, with a few rare exceptions. Slick tyres and wide track made the cars look aggressive and purposeful. |
||
|
26 Nov 2006, 22:46 (Ref:1775494) | #39 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,194
|
Quote:
And F1 cars shouldn't look like that |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
26 Nov 2006, 22:50 (Ref:1775495) | #40 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 601
|
Adam, i think that the 6 wheeler tyrrell was a nice looking car, plus it won races.
|
||
__________________
It isn't premarital sex if you have no intention of getting married. |
26 Nov 2006, 23:11 (Ref:1775502) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 924
|
my likings:
Mp4/8 classic compact lines, striking livery and beautiful dynamic shape: http://www.research-racing.de/gpx1213.jpg ferrari F310 muscular looking albeit a terrible race car... http://es.geocities.com/fichastecnicas/f1-f310-3-ok.JPG F310B chiselled dynamic looks, clean aero but not to the cheese grater extent the cars are at now: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/G...788/pic111.jpg FW23 similar to above, like the big sweeping flip ups. Before aero got rediculous http://b.f1-facts.com/ul/a/5633 and the mp4/20 had great curves. Easily the best looking car of 05. looked like someone melted cheese over a racecar. nice and fluid. http://www.f1news.ru/Championship/20...s/mclaren0.jpg http://www.motorpasion.com/archivos/...en-naranja.jpg i thought the renault, williams and bmw were the best looking cars in 06, i like the current shape but could do away with any aero bits on the sidepods that look like they could be a fancy way to grate a carrot. I think other than that the cars look pretty svelte every year. There are always good and bad. Last edited by rocketracer; 26 Nov 2006 at 23:17. |
||
|
27 Nov 2006, 12:48 (Ref:1775855) | #42 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,306
|
I'll go back even further. I think that the early '70's gave us the best looking cars.
A few that I love: Lotus 72, both Players red and gold livery and the great black and gold JPS livery. McLaren M23 (the first year in the Yardley livery) Shadow DN5 Braham's BT42 and BT44 Ferrari 312B (1970) Surtees TS9B And in the late 70's Lotus 79 But I agree with Knowlesly's comment that today's cars are all cluttered with too many bits hanging off. Once the narrow-track grooved-tire cards came in, they got ugly. |
||
__________________
Go Tribe!!!! |
27 Nov 2006, 13:26 (Ref:1775884) | #43 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,194
|
Quote:
My criteria was not race wins anyway, although for those racing it a winning car must be beautiful. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
27 Nov 2006, 23:10 (Ref:1776226) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,594
|
Have a look at these links. Not mine, but a student that keeps in touch with me.
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/35710692/ http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/38248193/ lots of fins and winglets though |
||
__________________
---> 2017 Spotter Guides - Le Mans live from 10th June! IMSA WeatherTech, Continental, Porsche GT3 Cup USA, Canada, Lamborghini Super Trofeo NA and Europe also available<--- |
28 Nov 2006, 19:51 (Ref:1776912) | #45 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
I agree totally that the 1990 or 1989 Ferrari v12? was incredible. One of my all time favourites. I remember it well.
|
||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
28 Nov 2006, 21:05 (Ref:1776953) | #46 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,254
|
a design to be beautiful must be clean, smooth and flowing, not to boxy and looked like it was simply drawn and then created, not
"we've got this great design for bodywork, it is slippery as an eel, the only problem is that its got more holes and ridges than a cheese grater" simple lines are a must and the design must flow thats why i love the look of the 1960's racing cars and that of the early 90's with the likes of the jordan 191, my favourite cars have to be the lotu49 and the eagle weslake though, they just look right, and things that look right generaly are. the new breed of f1 cars are too 'busy' too many ridges, wings and apendages to ever be classes as beautiful, although some have an underlying beauty to be seen such as the mclaren mentioned above, it has a clean flowing curved line from front to back which is evident under the makeup of a few stuck on eyelashes and some makeup. |
||
__________________
never eat belly button fluff |
30 Nov 2006, 16:54 (Ref:1778815) | #47 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Jordan 191>All. Full stop.
|
||
|
30 Nov 2006, 23:38 (Ref:1779130) | #48 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
I agree. The Jordan 191 was very nice in it's 7up livery.
But this is...... (it's a sound thing as well as a look...) BRM V16..... mmmmmmmmmm... scream! Rob. Last edited by R59; 30 Nov 2006 at 23:40. |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
1 Dec 2006, 00:40 (Ref:1779154) | #49 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
I happen to think this year's Ferrari was more pleasant than most recent cars. But I'm of the general thinking that anything built after '95 is fairly ugly. Anything built after '01 is simply hideous.
All the "busy" aerodynamical parts, such as those weird chimneys etc. They just look awful. Logo's barely fit anymore, there's shape changes everywhere, and nothing ever looks beautiful, purposeful and sleek. There is nothing aesthetically pleasing about a modern F1 car to me. '91 McLaren, '93 McLaren, '95 Ferrari, '90 Ferrari... all gorgeous... I wish Bernie had taken action on this sort of thing long ago, like they did with the X-Wings in '98. |
||
|
1 Dec 2006, 01:59 (Ref:1779180) | #50 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
Oh, F1 cars may not be too pretty, but trust me, they have nothing on the IRL. Pathetic cars for a pathetic organization: http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/ye...rt/800/irl.jpg Man those things are so big and fat. And then we have the Grand-Am cars. Us Yanks seem to be having an ugly car epidemic. Give me an F1 car please! |
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ever wonder what's inside an F1 car? | chillibowl | Formula One | 7 | 3 Aug 2006 01:21 |
F1 Car Ballast | Try Hard | Racing Technology | 9 | 22 Apr 2004 21:12 |
The Worst F1 Car Ever? | Armco Bender | Formula One | 59 | 2 Dec 2002 04:34 |
Which F1 Car are YOU? | DNQ | Formula One | 50 | 28 Mar 2002 17:23 |