|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Feb 2007, 01:25 (Ref:1849544) | #26 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,133
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Personally, if they lifted the 7500rpm cut to 8500 ot 9000rpm, allowed some exotic materials to be used in the brake package, then I'd say go the sequential, but in the mean time stick to the H pattern, suit the series. |
|||||
|
23 Feb 2007, 02:06 (Ref:1849565) | #27 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
Quote:
Each shift in an H gate is 1/4 sec. Using the sequential may reduce that shift time. |
||||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
23 Feb 2007, 02:27 (Ref:1849569) | #28 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 594
|
Quote:
You see no fans = no series, I've got an idea, bugger the punters, lets get Super tourers instead, they're more relevant to todays market and have sequential gearboxes to boot! Oh hang on......... |
|||
__________________
Motorsport is dead........... |
23 Feb 2007, 02:45 (Ref:1849575) | #29 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 418
|
OK, let me rephrase. The punters probably wouldn't care a rats whether they have H or sequential. It wont make any difference to how the cars look & sound on the track.
Its the hardcores who tend to think that it will be the rack & ruin of the category. It just makes sense to go the seq. Same price, better reliability, less maint.... |
||
|
23 Feb 2007, 03:14 (Ref:1849585) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 594
|
Point taken and your right, joe average fan won't know any different, and no it wont ruin the category, but I think it will be a detraction to the sport (well that small part of it that is still sport!)
|
||
__________________
Motorsport is dead........... |
23 Feb 2007, 03:20 (Ref:1849589) | #31 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
You finally get it...........................Brilliant!! |
|||
__________________
Dyslexia rules KO |
23 Feb 2007, 04:48 (Ref:1849632) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,208
|
Well Joe Average doesn't know the difference between rear wheel drive and front wheel pull. Lets make them front wheel pull, thats what almost all cars are these days. Traction control is the same and would also save tyres, better bring that in. What about the spool diff? Antiquated engine?
|
||
__________________
Phil Mills: 30, 6-Left-Plus Over-Crest-Long, Opens-Over-Crest 100, COW-COW, 100, 6-Left-Minus Extra-Long Fabrizio Giovanardi: I have like a banana - is the yellow car in front - that make me, you know, running like the monkey, running for the banana. When I see yellow in front, I just pushing harder and harder. I want that banana. |
23 Feb 2007, 10:01 (Ref:1849742) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 862
|
Hmmmm...... Snatching second instead of fourth at the top of the back straight at Sandown and reversing the car over the armco during the Sunday morning warm up gives the fans a huge bang for someone else's buck.
Let's keep the H pattern. I doubt that most formula Ford or Vee drivers could afford a new sequential box anyway. |
||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sequential manual transmission. | chernaudi | Racing Technology | 13 | 2 Jan 2007 22:32 |
V8 Supercars going for sequential gearboxes, whats next? | Peddler | Australasian Touring Cars. | 46 | 15 Nov 2006 09:22 |
anyone own an Omex shiftlight sequential? | GolddustMini | Racing Technology | 7 | 9 Jun 2005 18:54 |
Sequential Gearboxes? | Harves | Australasian Touring Cars. | 60 | 15 Jul 2004 23:07 |