|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Jul 2005, 01:00 (Ref:1364268) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 511
|
Can someone become WDC without one of the best cars ?
Alonso looks like being the WDC this year in what was the best / second best car during the year.
With the amount of races and the current points distribution, I don't think that you can be a WDC in anything but the best equipment. Previously, if you won a wet race or two in a sub standard car, because you were a champion driver, you had a chance at the WDC, but now you need more than 1 or 2 wins... and that just isn't going to happen. DKGandBH |
||
__________________
Look at my web page... |
27 Jul 2005, 02:53 (Ref:1364299) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Indeed, in modern era of F1, the best car would essentially win the driver the WDC. The points system doesn't seem to help either, placing larger emphasis on reliability than ever before.
Looking back, Michael won the WDC in cars that were clearly great. Mika won his WDC when Mclaren were at their recent best, and the same could be said for D.Hill and J.V who won when Williams are by far the best cars..the list just runs on. When there is no clear car advantage, for example 2000 and 2003, the championship can be closer however. Similarly, it's up to teams to compromise between speed and reliability. Kimi's Mclaren finally found speed after a handful of races this year, yet reliability is seriously lacking... so although the Mclaren may seem a "better car" by the end of the year... too much ground is lost to Renault which have a better car compromise. Familar grounds really, looking back to 98 and 97, when the catching up team just falls short because of the grounds lost early in the season... the same this year? In any case, take no credit away from Alonso, who has a fantastic year. He may have the best car this year, but he's also doing a bloody good job to make sure he don't lose that advantage. |
||
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to." |
27 Jul 2005, 03:01 (Ref:1364301) | #3 | |||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,344
|
Quote:
Can one then asume (from previous WCs) that Mclaren will cakewalk the next year or two? |
|||
__________________
"Abe will be remembered as a fighter" - RIP Abe. |
27 Jul 2005, 03:51 (Ref:1364313) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
For the most part the cars are now super reliable. To a certain degree McLaren haven't really stepped up to the top reliability standard that Ferrari forced all of the teams to adopt. The McLaren has been the fastest car for most of the season, but I think the Renault has been the best car.
Can someone in a worse than 2nd best car win the championship? Yes, but it takes poor luck or reliability of other drivers. HHF in '99 is the prime example, he almost did it. Back in 2003 both Kimi and JPM were in the championship fight right to the end (or near end). The McLaren probably was the 3rd best car. The new points system means that if one driver finishes more consistantly well and the other gets a DNF or two and gets some finishes in the points, but not always a win, the consistant driver CAN win. |
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
27 Jul 2005, 05:15 (Ref:1364324) | #5 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
No-one has ever won the World Championship in a car that wasn't close to the best.
|
|
|
27 Jul 2005, 05:31 (Ref:1364331) | #6 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 312
|
The car can only get you so far. After that it's luck and the lack of mistakes that make all the difference. F1 is really unforgiving, and to an extent has always been so. A driver prone to errors will undoubtedly lose the championship, even in the best car (Eddie Irvine comes to mind).
But yes having the best car definitely gets you a head start. Alonso and Raikkonen are both WDC material, they are cool under pressure and are very fast and smooth. Raikkonen has been plagued of course by reliability issues, not so much mistakes. I'd say about 1/3 of the current F1 drivers could have a good go at the WDC given a Renault today. But then you think of Fisi, who supposedly has the same car but has been outshadowed by Alonso. So maybe that number is a bit high, perhaps 1/4 of the drivers could have a good crack at the WDC. |
|
__________________
Photojournalist |
27 Jul 2005, 06:02 (Ref:1364336) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 294
|
Yeah I was going to say HHF in the Jordan that one year so close and then at one of the final races of the year he was leading the race and had an engine failure I almost cried. Other then that Senna's performance in 93 in the Ford Mclaren was very impressive and at the time the benetton, Williams, and Ferrari were faster i believe.
I think in todays F1 the closes someone can get to winning the championship with a bad car would DC in the Red Bull and maybe Jarno Truli in the Toyota. They both put in great performances in cars everyone knows are not as fast as their rivals. |
||
|
27 Jul 2005, 06:56 (Ref:1364359) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
The only car that can win a WDC this year is the Renault, whilst it may not be the fastest out there, it's still fast and extremely reliable. |
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
27 Jul 2005, 07:08 (Ref:1364366) | #9 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
Williams, yes, Benetton, sometimes, Ferrari, no. |
||
|
27 Jul 2005, 07:20 (Ref:1364371) | #10 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
1982 - Rosberg won the title for Williams with one win during the season. It was a series of circumstances that led to that, both the main title contenders were eliminated (GV tragically killed and Pironi seriously injured) and the two Renaults were fast yet unreliable.
This allowed Rosberg in the normally aspirated car to claim the title, Pironi still finished 2nd despite missing the last 5 races. It was a season where the Cosworth DFV powered cars defeated the turbo's through a combination of circumstance, greater agility and driveability at some tracks, coupled with the turbo cars still being in development and the ensuing reliability and handling problems. Rosberg's car wasn't the 'best' it was one of the best of the rest evenly matched with the McLarens and Brabhams. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
27 Jul 2005, 09:05 (Ref:1364441) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
You can win the title in the third best car if things go your way, and there isn'#t a huge performance difference. Look at 2003, where 3 cars all come close to producing the champion driver. Admittedly, the two changes in tyres that year made the difference - Ferrari dominated with the ruled-to-be-illegal Bridgestones on their new car, but were nowhere until the rules were 're-interpreted' to exclude Michelin's previously-legal tyres.
When you go into a season in a car which is third-best, your aim is to do so well that either the team becomes championshuip-capable, or bring yourself to the attention of a team which can win the championship. |
||
|
27 Jul 2005, 09:39 (Ref:1364472) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
The only way you can win the title without having the best car is if the guys in front of you crash/spin/retire all the time. But no, without any strange combinations of facts, no there's no way one can win it this way. Raikkonen has the fastest car this year and clearly the second best and is miles behind Alonso, who has not the fastest but the overal better car. Of course, if Alonso was not a top driver (like Fisico is not - sorry), Kimi would have a chance. But that's as far as it goes: maybe with the second best car, but not with not a really really good car.
|
||
|
27 Jul 2005, 11:26 (Ref:1364573) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
27 Jul 2005, 11:29 (Ref:1364577) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,065
|
Yes. By the margin of a single point IIRC.
|
||
__________________
I am just a cowboy lonesome on the trail A starry night, a campfire light The coyote call, the howling winds wail So I ride out to the old sundown |
27 Jul 2005, 11:46 (Ref:1364584) | #15 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Pironi and Watson tied on 39 points, they also had the same number of wins (2 each), but Pironi is listed above JW in the rankings on formula1.com - presumably on countback of other results.
Rosberg won the title on 44 points - 5 ahead of 2nd place. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
27 Jul 2005, 12:00 (Ref:1364596) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Around that time the turbo cars (Brabham, Ferrari adn Renautl that year) were fastest, but the NA cars were mroe reliable and managed to steadily pick up results. GV wasn't actually anywhere near the front of the championship when his accident unfolded, but he was showing plenty of pace.
|
||
|
27 Jul 2005, 12:26 (Ref:1364625) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,026
|
Prost, Mclaren 1986 ? Not as fast as Willys or Lotus, even Benetton quicker by the end too. Or Jody S in 79, at various times that year his Ferrari was much slower than the Willys, Ligiers, Renaults, yet he still won it quite convincingly.
So the answer to the question is yes easily, reliability has much to do with winning, as well as a sympathetic and intelligent driver of course. |
||
|
27 Jul 2005, 21:56 (Ref:1365081) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Didn't Piquet win it one year in a Brabham, when the rather unreliable but notably faster Renaults kept falling out of the lead? However, it would still come under one of the best cars I guess....or was it more purely down to an inspired Piquet?
I am just jumbling together unclear memories of stuff read in the past. |
||
|
28 Jul 2005, 05:22 (Ref:1365242) | #19 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
It was down to dodgy fuel, some say, Dutton!
The 1983 championship is significant though - it was the last time anyone other than a Williams/McLaren driver or Michael Schumacher won the world championship. |
|
|
28 Jul 2005, 05:44 (Ref:1365252) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
If only the same team could win the WCC this year as did in '83, .
|
||
|
28 Jul 2005, 13:45 (Ref:1365609) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
|
Well, we've had a 'clarification' on tyre rules after a run of Michelin successes, just like 2003, so who knows?
|
|
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom" |
28 Jul 2005, 19:10 (Ref:1365874) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Urrgghhh.
And the pre-Monaco clarification that went against Bridgestone didn't happen then, I presume? |
||
|
29 Jul 2005, 12:35 (Ref:1366540) | #23 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
Quote:
Stewart's '73 win was pretty good - the Lotus 72s were quicker and the McLaren M23 was potentially a better car - but you'd still have to sat that the 006 was one of the quicker cars on the grid. |
||||
|
29 Jul 2005, 15:11 (Ref:1366635) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
I really think a simply solid and consistant driver could have the championship this year if they were in a Renault. Fisi is just plain off his form, but even someone who's consistantly a tenth or two slower than Alonso could win in this year's Renault. I'm not exactly sure how the following compare to Alonso, but a Button, Rubins (although he's off this year), Heidfeld, Trulli, Ralf (off this year), JPM (off, but possibly not enough), etc. could win the WDC in this year's Renault. If it eases one's mind, assume that for this theoretical situation that Alonso isn't at Renault.
|
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
29 Jul 2005, 15:41 (Ref:1366663) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wish list of cars to be made to gt1 cars | slicktsax | Sportscar & GT Racing | 24 | 6 Oct 2005 09:02 |
GP 2 cars are approximately 3 secs faster than the F3000 cars | Frank_White | National & International Single Seaters | 18 | 5 Nov 2004 23:06 |
IMSA GTP cars should have been 2,000+ horsepower cars | Green Monster | North American Racing | 29 | 17 Jun 2004 01:20 |
F1 Safety Cars / Medical Cars | Mark Stevens | Formula One | 8 | 21 May 2004 18:10 |
2003 Touring cars - what predictions for teams and cars (and colours!!) | adamp_uk | Touring Car Racing | 16 | 17 Oct 2002 20:12 |