|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
31 Oct 2006, 09:29 (Ref:1754219) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
I spoke to Steve Wesloski about this time last year about the future of GT1 and he was scared that AMR would pull out - if they did it would mean that GM were not really racing anyone. They are committed to racing in GT's for the long term but would have to do something drastic if they had nobody to run against.
The solution to GT1 problem is GT500 and GT300 - instantly three works teams plus odds and sods like the Lambo's and Ferraris. |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
1 Nov 2006, 05:01 (Ref:1754944) | #27 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 260
|
Why Corvette Races
Corvette races, among other reasons, to....
....learn about customer cars (May, 2005 - Former Chief Corvette Engineer Dave Hill reading my Corvette Specs and History sheet at Mid-Ohio Corvette Corral).... ....expose the product to others (Corvette parade at Petit Le Mans - limited to the first 100 Corvettes to sign up) .... ....and to provide lunch, seminars, new product exposure and a great meeting place for exisiting customers (a few of the several hundred Corvettes in the Road Atlanta Corral). Racing in Europe or racing in LMP1 won't do those jobs nearly as well. I am sure they will do everything possible to stay in ALMS and to encourage competition. By the way, Lou Gigliotti of Speed World Challenge fame, has been asked by a customer to build a Corvette GT2 car. Lou has apparently launched discussions with the sanctioning bodies about the possibilities. Back in 2000, Trinkler Motorsports had Pratt & Miller help them build and homologate the only LM-GT (GT2 equivalent) Corvette ever approved: |
||
__________________
David About 13.7 billion years ago I heard a very loud noise - did you hear it? |
1 Nov 2006, 11:26 (Ref:1755179) | #28 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 376
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
1 Nov 2006, 15:32 (Ref:1755372) | #29 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
Porsches reaction to Greenwood destroyed the original IMSA series, including Chevy "supported" Monzas (I never liked the Monzas) so it would be Chevrolet's chance for pay-backs. Sadly, until the rules are rewritten, it is not going to happen. Bob |
|||
|
1 Nov 2006, 15:46 (Ref:1755381) | #30 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
1 Nov 2006, 16:15 (Ref:1755399) | #31 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
This will say more than I could; beyond that John Greenwood was Porsche's biggest worry during the original IMSA GT series. Unreliability (due to Chevrolet's engines being far more capable than even the hardiest heavy duty parts available for the drive train) made finishes, much less wins, rare for Greenwood, and other Chevy powered cars (Many times a Chevy, even it was top six, was being nursed around the track with gears missing from the tranny) BUT when Greenwoods cars did run well, it annoyed the Porsche big-wigs greatly for Greenwood to drive by their top teams like they were standing still. Porsche did not know that the lack of support by Chevy for Greenwood would make him finally say to hell with it and pretty much quit, so the turbo Porsches were created keep up with Greenwood on fast tracks that once were run. The 934, though loathed by John Bishop for the expense to run one, were capable of running with the top Detroit Iron, heads-up, but not run away from it. John Bishop did not want to allow the 935, but the Camel sponsor badgered him until he did, with the results he had pretty much expected. The Detroit Iron drivers were not driving factory developed cars, and were already at a budge limit in 1977; in 1978 when the 935 showed up and dominatedm the last of the top AAGT driver just plain quit, as they had no factory supplied warehouse of go-fast goodies to call on. John Bishop opened the GT rules a bit more and created the GTX class out of AAGT, but again there was no money to pay for developement of US cars. Maurice Carter, and Billy Hagan, took adavantage of the GTX rules to adapt short track Camaros to road racing with some good results, but the handwriting was on the wall and when Bishop announced the new GTP rules the last of the US GT boys quit. Bob PS--The later GTO class was a totally tube-frame animal not related to the first prod. based GTs. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is your favourite GT1 Car? (Current day GT1 Regulations) | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 55 | 14 Sep 2006 08:15 |
The Best 2005 GT1 Car? It is Corvette by my calculations…. | David | Sportscar & GT Racing | 30 | 19 Dec 2005 22:29 |
Trans Am Corvette & Grand Am Rolex Corvette? | pgtr | North American Racing | 16 | 8 Sep 2003 05:45 |
AGT Corvette VS ALMS Corvette | H16 | North American Racing | 7 | 7 Jan 2003 20:00 |
How many teams and what teamsCART Teams at 2001 INDY 500 | mayhemotorsports | IRL Indycar Series | 9 | 8 Jun 2000 13:08 |