|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Jul 2006, 21:02 (Ref:1659456) | #51 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
Yeah I'd be guessing that the article exludes 1999 and mostly looks at the 2000-2006 stuff, it stats pretty much in the stats. It does mention a little of the 1999 campaign at the start but then really worries about the version that went onto so much success.
In the history books, it is really the time from 2000 that will be noticed and the shape and version from 2000 is the one that endured the success. Sure the R8C and R8R may have been platforms, but it was never the versions that went onto success. And that the BMW was being wound down still does not change the fact that they could not beat the Audi... |
|
|
18 Jul 2006, 22:14 (Ref:1659522) | #52 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,404
|
Quote:
And as for the BMW being wound down in 99 - It was a NEW CAR for 1999! And it won Le Mans - It had little or nothing (aside from the engine) to do with the 1998 V12LM |
|||
|
19 Jul 2006, 06:56 (Ref:1659709) | #53 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
It is you who is being selective. If you're going to say that the R8 was linked to the R8R, then you can make a direct comparison with BMW's '98 LMP1, which was something of a failure, I'm sure you'll agree... |
|||
|
19 Jul 2006, 13:32 (Ref:1660006) | #54 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
The machines the Audi were up against in the early days were never at the end of their life. They were new or near new. No one (particularly the manufacturers) could claim their cars were obsolete
|
|
|
24 Jul 2006, 16:56 (Ref:1663490) | #55 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
The second part of the Audi R8 retrospective is up at
http://feedmesportscars.com/node/809 if anyone is interested |
|
|
27 Jul 2006, 16:04 (Ref:1666012) | #56 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,217
|
Quote:
I am not playing favourites with the BMW LMR, although some people think they have 'caught me out' in that act of doing just that. Regarding the pre R8R/R8C car, I can remember it in my mind, but I will have to hunt around for an image. When I checked the records of the 1999 race, as it was brought up here, I was intrigued by the qualifying results. What happend there? I'm assuming there were no incidents during qualifying to affect the Audi times, but if someone has some information about that it might be handy. Disagreeing is quite ok, particularly if there is some evidence or reference put forward, but the sarcasm could be given a break. |
|||
|
28 Jul 2006, 12:44 (Ref:1666617) | #57 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
I think whenever you take the life of the Audi R8 from, it is an amazingly successful car, as demostrated by the articles. The 1999 BMW also deserves credit afterall it beat some amazing competition - argueably stronger than what the R8 faced.
But what the R8 did was scare off the competition. Cadallic could not get their stuff together, Panoz left LMP900, the BMW could not keep up the pace and other potentials did not think they could beat it consistantly (or so it would appear) |
|
|
29 Jul 2006, 00:15 (Ref:1666909) | #58 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Speed does not kill....it shaves seconds from lap times! |
29 Jul 2006, 14:49 (Ref:1667152) | #59 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
Thankfully for Audi, the R10 has arrived as the prototype ranks are on an upwards curve, so they will face much stiffer opposition. |
||
|
30 Jul 2006, 15:02 (Ref:1667909) | #60 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
Yeah, fortunately the Audi R10 will have Peugeot - neither manufactuer will be willing to settle for second best...
|
|
|
10 Dec 2006, 01:05 (Ref:1786143) | #61 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
And remember that the R8 was raced for longer than even Audi probably expected, and it still won! Just look at the Houston ALMS race. It ran .9 sec. faster than the Porsche Spyder, and even more than the nearest LMP 1 car in the first practice, was still much faster than anything else in practice#2, and was only marginally beaten in qualifying due to a minor handling problem, and ran lead the most laps, and also had the fastest race lap( which was faster than they ran in qualifying).
Granted, the competition wasn't the best, but I believe that Toyota heard what the R8 could do back in '99 when it was being tested in the fall of that year, and ran away with their tail between their legs! And those who wanter to go against the Audi R8, tried, and failed, repeatedly, irregardless of who they were, how much money they had, and what car they used. Even when Audi wound down factory support for the R8 after '04, when work on the R10 really started to pick up, privateers still raced and won quite frequently with the cars( Ie: ADT Champion Racing). Although Audi still supported the teams on a semi factory basis, the teams themselves were the most responsible for milking ever more speed and performance out of these cars. And they are the closest thing to a sports car that could ben entered in to a demo derby( or a NASCAR race at Bristol or Martinsville) and survive. They've hit concrete walls, guardrails, other cars, and still made it back to the pits with damage that would lead most other cars to be abandoned at the side of the track( see LM '04), and also race competitively with damage that would cripple most other cars. Was the R8 really that great? That's pretty much up to personal opinion. However, an old Racer Magazine article stated that the Audi R8 would still've regulary humilliated the competition anyways, no matter who showed up, ow with what, especially if they were built to the same rules. |
||
|
10 Dec 2006, 01:15 (Ref:1786158) | #62 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,366
|
Personally I think you've pretty much answered your own question. Yes the Audi R8 really was a very good car and indeed one of the best racing cars of all time. IMO.
|
||
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite! |
10 Dec 2006, 13:44 (Ref:1786820) | #63 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 402
|
And it looked good too, which is more than you can say of the R10!
|
||
|
12 Dec 2006, 04:11 (Ref:1788598) | #64 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
I know that I've already asked this question, but does anyone know about the R8 engine's bore/stroke, length, width, and height demensions? I desperately want to know, but I can't find anything.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Being a good development driver vs a good "racer"? | Mattracer | Formula One | 9 | 7 Jun 2004 11:07 |
Craig Pollock - Good Salesman (Talker) ! or Good Owner?? | sgjb | ChampCar World Series | 21 | 29 Jul 2003 07:50 |
Good buy? | speedy king | Kart Racing | 7 | 25 Oct 2002 19:03 |
Good Karter=Good car racer????? | Morcilman | Kart Racing | 14 | 15 Oct 2002 21:20 |
A Good End to a Good Year | Liz | ChampCar World Series | 5 | 6 Nov 2001 09:29 |