Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 Jan 2002, 00:46 (Ref:198338)   #1
honest ron
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location:
dublin
Posts: 10
honest ron should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
tyre areo question

ok,...... i was wondering about something,..... i was at a williams ex designer's seminar ages ago, and he said that 40% of an f1 cars areodynamic resistence comes from the 4 tyres (wheels and tyres).

having kept this in mind , i have noticed the renaults new front wing system,.....they've changed from the central triangle design from last year like jordan had and use the end plates to shove as much of the air above the tyre as possible, whilst primarily enhancing downforce of course

my question is this, ..... is it more efficient to have the air run above the central point of the tyre or below the central point of the tyre ?...... considering the direction that the tyre is rolling, maybe it would run smoother underneath but would the air be trapped slightly and reduce downforce ? just a thought.......
honest ron is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jan 2002, 01:45 (Ref:198350)   #2
Arneal
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
New Mexico, USA
Posts: 148
Arneal should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It is better to have the air go above the central point of the tire. As you suggest may happen, the air near the tires contact patch stagnates and creates lift on the tire.

Open wheel race cars not only derive large amounts of their total drag from the wheels, but the wheels also create lift. This is partially due to the stagnation mentioned above and partially due to their airfoil like shape. Aerodynamically speaking, open wheels are terrible things!
Arneal is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jan 2002, 02:16 (Ref:198357)   #3
honest ron
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location:
dublin
Posts: 10
honest ron should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
then is there a regulation which stipulates the width of a front wing ?.... and also why dont all the f1 teams use the little extension to help reduce the airflow problem ?.....

im no expert , in fact quite the opposite ! but have a look at the mc laren, ......they definately know their stuff i guess yet they seem to prefer to catch the air and direct it into the body of the car heres an example : http://www.f1i.com/data/images/F12F0...KON_ACT6_1.jpg

thanks for the reply,..... arneal !!!!! the forums are a great way to learn and understand better the advanced nature of motor sport !! much appriciated
honest ron is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jan 2002, 11:08 (Ref:199431)   #4
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
hmmm

McLaren had a wing similar to the one shown on the renault. All tams use a win that try to divert the airflow outside of the tyres.

I wonder if they tried that as I reckon that it will direct a large amount of airflow into the side pods and therefore help cooling. This also makes me wonder if their engine woes last year were over heating related...
imull is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2002, 12:16 (Ref:205727)   #5
Dino IV
Veteran
 
Dino IV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
MagnetON
NL
Posts: 1,101
Dino IV should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDino IV should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
It's not that they try to lead the airflow outside of the tires but inside of them. Look at a F1 car from above and you'll have to imagine the airflow densing in a 'feminine' or coca-cola bottle form. From the wing endplates inwards, following the bargeboard, inbetween centering towards the splitter, then outwards along the sidepods, end before the rear wheels carving strongly in again towards the diffuser and rear wing. All these motions guided as much as possible by vortices created by i.e. the wingendplate form and attached parts, the bargeboard upper edge etc. This is mostly for the part which is under the wheel centrelines.
Dino IV is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Feb 2002, 06:34 (Ref:209392)   #6
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Great stuff.Just wanted to add abit of silly trivia.people have trid to make aircraft with 'wings' that are actually rotating cylinder shapes.It did create lift but drag must have been horrendous
RWC is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another tyre Question ActiveMS Racing Technology 3 14 Feb 2004 15:59
A Tyre Question Yoong Montoya Formula One 9 22 Oct 2002 19:06
Yet another tyre question! Vanwall Racing Technology 2 16 Jul 2001 12:04
Another tyre question ? marcus Racing Technology 3 11 Jul 2001 02:41


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.