|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
18 Feb 2009, 19:36 (Ref:2399846) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
|
BTCC 2001 questions
Im just getting back into the BTCC series after a few yrs of taking no interest ( after the super tourers finished) , as ive purchased the 2008 dvd recently , and the racing is still awsome ( could do with more incar/bumper cam shots though)...
As i was watching them a few questions popped into my head , which hopefully you guys will answer.. Firstly, why did gow quit and the series change from the four door family cars to the coupe ( astra/406 etc) ?? And why did all the manufacturers drop out ??? i know it was a cost consideration but seeing as it was a new format what did they dislike about it ?? |
||
__________________
,Daihatsu Charade Gtti, 998cc twin can 12v turbo , .. 405 mi16 ( black beauty). volvo v70 t5 .. |
18 Feb 2009, 20:00 (Ref:2399853) | #2 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
The coupes came in at the same time time as Supertouring went : the creation of the BTC-Touring rules. I presume it was due to a perception that four-door repmobiles weren't universally popular, and more sporty models would be prefered. Not that the MG workhorses used by WSR were BTC-T rules and four doors. The rules allowed both. Quote:
|
||||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
18 Feb 2009, 21:49 (Ref:2399908) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,336
|
2000 saw a major shift towards Coupes in several European countries.
Germany re-started DTM with the CLKs, Astra Coupes and TTs and France switched to that weird silhouette formula which we still see today in BTCS, which also allowed for Coupes like the Pug 407. It's my personal touring car pet peeve, that they couldn't come up with a common ruleset back then... |
||
|
19 Feb 2009, 13:41 (Ref:2400225) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
Gow didn't quit so to speak from memory.
Didn't TOCA UK lose the rights to promote & run the BTCC to BMP (British Motorsport Promoters), who were supposed to take over circa-2002 after TOCA's deal finished in 2001 (wasn't it announced during 1999) This was in the middle of the rule changes previously announced by TOCA that were supposed to come into effect in 2001. From memory in early 2000 TOCA UK was sold to BMP, and Gow stepped down to allow the new lot to run it (i forget the figureheads name, West??) In early 2003 Gow was re-appointed at the head of the series. Others here would be able to be more detailed though |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
19 Feb 2009, 14:56 (Ref:2400256) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 121
|
So really it all went pear shaped because Gow left and another promoter took over and tried to alter the series??
One thing that bemuses me though about the manufacturers is that they will spent hundreds of millions of pounds running an f1 team , mostly without a chance of success ( toyota for example) but wouldnt carry on spending 10 million ( or whatever figure it was ) on touring cars , which is a more positive advert for the manufacturer(imo) and was shown throughout the world ... , Everybody remembers the btcc estates , even though they didnt win a race ( i now drive a volvo estate due to my fond memories back in the day) ...And a 405 mi16 as my toy .. |
||
__________________
,Daihatsu Charade Gtti, 998cc twin can 12v turbo , .. 405 mi16 ( black beauty). volvo v70 t5 .. |
19 Feb 2009, 15:42 (Ref:2400280) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
At that point, something had to give, and the 2001 BTC-T regs were a response to that. I guess manufacturers picked coupes or hatches because they felt they were the models best suited to the rules, and because that's what they wanted to market. The 4-door family saloon v Coupe debate doesn't really make any odds to me, because I'm part of that older generation who go back to 80's Group A when touring cars covered everything from 2/4 door saloons to 3/5 door hatches to coupes- for me if the regs say it's a touring car, then it's a touring car. |
||
|
19 Feb 2009, 15:43 (Ref:2400282) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Feb 2009, 17:06 (Ref:2400313) | #8 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 11,005
|
It was too expensive and, coupled with the changes in the car industry at that time (Renault and Nissan becoming one; Volvo being bought by Ford, etc.), the series was on a downward spiral from the end of 1998. The following year was a pretty good season but many of the big names left at the end of 99 and turnout was a shambles in 2000. Plans had been afoot to replace the Super Touring rules for a season or two but they were a year late and were always playing catch-up to the new ETCC/WTCC series and their Super 2000 regs. Whilst some progress was made under Richard West's guidance (not much to be honest!) it took the return of Alan Gow for any real confidence to return to the series but, by that time it was too late and the series had become little more than a glorified club-racing series.
|
|
|
19 Feb 2009, 18:42 (Ref:2400355) | #9 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,961
|
A small point, but looking back now I cringe at the BTCC package being called TOCA Tour. That in itself may have confused some people.
Also I think that during 2000 the guy in charge was a Martin Bain - I remember a lot of positive noises being made during late 2000 about Audi and Toyota entering the 2001 series. |
|
|
19 Feb 2009, 18:57 (Ref:2400365) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,447
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 Feb 2009, 19:05 (Ref:2400368) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,264
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Michael Delaney was wrong. In between is not waiting - in between is the glory, the passion. In between is what elevates racing. |
19 Feb 2009, 19:51 (Ref:2400406) | #12 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,961
|
Quote:
Thats the chap. |
||
|
19 Feb 2009, 20:03 (Ref:2400412) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,979
|
Quote:
You'd have to ask Alan Gow himself why he actually quit. I suspect he had the opportunity to sell up and move on and decided the time was right. Quote:
The basics of BTC-T (reduced costs, common components) was what TOCA had proposed 18 months earlier. The boxy body and oversized aero were a later addition, designed to appeal to the 'Max Power' market. The 4-door / minimum length requirements which had been a cornerstone of Super Touring for many years were dropped for these new regs, which meant cars such as the Astra and 406 Coupe were now possible. Whether it was Vauxhall taking advantage of the new regs or using their influence to steer the new regs in that direction is another question - I suspect a little of both. |
|||
|
20 Feb 2009, 11:15 (Ref:2400744) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
OK, it would have left the manufacturers with the problem of building 'BTC-P' cars for a single season, and the reduced performance of the cars would have probably damaged the image of the series, but would that have been any worse than starting the season with less than 10 BTC-T cars, about 50% of which were actually competitive, and the grid padded out with a secondary Production class anyway? The comment about the 'Max Power' bodykit is interesting- I always found those much more of a 'turn-off' factor about the series than the move to coupes and hatches under 'BTC-T'... |
||
|
20 Feb 2009, 20:49 (Ref:2401044) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,979
|
Quote:
In the run up to 2001 we were expecting 2 works teams (Peugeot and Vauxhall) each running 3 or 4 cars, a third works team (MG) coming in later in the year, plus a couple of privateer teams (JSM promising 3-4 Alfas and TMS/AGB's pair of Lexus). On the face of it that's not a bad grid and could justify the decision to introduce the new regs. Of course with hindsight we now know that the Peugeot team imploded, JSM's engines exploded and that second Lexus would never be unloaded from the transporter. Switching entirely to Super Production would have been a tough sell. A lot of fans saw them as slow and uninteresting, despite the fact that they often produced better races than the main BTC-T field. Ultimately that could have done the series more damage than good. Personally I was a big fan of the Production class. I liked the fact you had a wide range of budgets and abilities, from the young chargers trying to forge a career to the 'gentlemen' drivers doing it mostly for fun. I wonder how much that would have changed had the works teams and big budgets got involved. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BTCC 2001 cars for F1 2001... | f2001 | Virtual Racers | 1 | 11 Feb 2002 22:03 |
BTCC Driver Questions | Invincible | Touring Car Racing | 7 | 6 Sep 2001 23:30 |
2001 Btcc | SPOONERBORO | Touring Car Racing | 39 | 21 Mar 2001 02:22 |
Who's in for BTCC 2001 ? | fatbloke | Touring Car Racing | 3 | 3 Jul 2000 08:14 |