|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Jun 2010, 08:31 (Ref:2712432) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 991
|
Speed limiter vs. Safety car"
I was wondering with all the safety cars mess in so many races, why not opt for a speed limiter system? If the need arises a light goes on in the cockpit and drivers have 10 seconds to safely get to the speed limit (say 110kmh) with no overtaking allowed.
No one gaining or loosing time or even a complete lap. Perhaps it takes some of the charm away, but wouldn't it be more fair to everyone? |
|
|
15 Jun 2010, 12:34 (Ref:2712541) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,359
|
You're missing a very important reason for using the safety car. It's not just there to slow the cars down; arguably its most important function is to bunch the cars up so that marshals, rescue, recovery, etc., working trackside know that there is a safe gap in which to work. Just slow the cars down & you won't have a big, predictable gap.
|
||
__________________
Doing an important job doesn't make you an important person. |
15 Jun 2010, 13:50 (Ref:2712588) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 179
|
I agree Taxi, this has always been a bug bear of mine.
The only thing I would add, it that on the section of cautioned track you need to keep the cars to one side, the side away from the incident keeping a safe distance between marshals etc on track dealing with the incident and the cars going past. I was watching Cart or some such USA oval race a number of years ago and noticed their rescue fire trucks were used to create a safety barrier between the incident and the cars still circulating. I got to thinking imagine having a number of dedicated vehicles around a circuit that were used to come out and funnel the cars onto the safe clear side of the circuit. Full bit, flashing lights, arrow lights etc, then when they hit the green flag safely past the incident, race the remainder of the lap until you get back to the restricted area with the incident, back to single file on safe side of circuit at pit lane limiter speed, and keep going in this fashion until its cleared. If they need to bring recovery trucks, medical vehicles etc around the circuit expand the length of cautioned restricted track to accommodate them coming around on the closed side of the circuit. Contract cautioned section of track again when they reach the incident. Expand again when they leave the incident. A circuit would need to be able to operate this system from either side of the circuit, so things like recovery or medical vehicles would need to have the ability to enter and exit the circuit from both sides so they aren't darting across racing traffic and are staying on the side of the circuit containing the incident. I see this as more of an issue at endurance events such as Le Mans because safety cars artificially manipulate the race. One that narks me more then most and I see this nearly every year is the Bathurst 1000 where you can guarantee there's a safety car probably 10 or 20 laps from the end creating a sprint finish, some might think it spices things up, but if that is what you want to watch, go and watch sprint racing. |
||
|
15 Jun 2010, 15:07 (Ref:2712616) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,359
|
Quote:
Pit lane limiter speed may still be too fast for safety past an incident; the safety car is in contact with race control, who can relay messages from the people handling the incident as to how fast to go & which side of the track to use - bear in mind that as clearing of the incident progresses, the "safe" side may vary. The safety car also reports its position at regular intervals, so the incident handlers know when the cars will be approaching & can act accordingly. Rescue units need to take injured drivers to the medical centre, recovery units need to take damaged cars back to Parc Fermé or the paddock, which means they may have to cover a considerable length of track. The safety car driver knows where they are & can control the speed of the "train" to keep behind them. Your idea of "contracting & expanding" the section of track under caution to accommodate is unnecessary - that situation is covered by the white flag. The safety car may not be an ideal solution, but in terms of resources required & the level of control provided it works well. It ain't broke. . . don't try to fix it. |
|||
__________________
Doing an important job doesn't make you an important person. |
15 Jun 2010, 15:55 (Ref:2712637) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,853
|
Well put over Dave.
|
||
__________________
Living the dream,Chief instruktor and racing on the worlds best circuits-The Nordschleife and Spa.Getting to drive the worlds best cars-someone has to do it, so glad its me. |
15 Jun 2010, 17:56 (Ref:2712694) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
why not red flag the race, and at restart simply let cars out of the pits in intrvals of the gaps they where before the incident
|
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
15 Jun 2010, 18:58 (Ref:2712739) | #7 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 254
|
^because then, the cars don't run for 24 hours..
|
|
|
15 Jun 2010, 23:51 (Ref:2712898) | #8 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,454
|
Why not the drivers just obey the flag signals and regulations? Saves the need for all sorts of faffing about and clever technology.
Would help if we could also sort out the regulations, but enforcing what we've got would be a good start. |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
22 Jun 2010, 20:24 (Ref:2716532) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
No safety car at dubai or 'ring 24 - they seem to cope ok
|
||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
23 Jun 2010, 01:29 (Ref:2716659) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,673
|
|||
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed! by NaBUrean Prodooktionz naburu38.itch.io |
25 Jun 2010, 18:36 (Ref:2717947) | #11 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 863
|
Quote:
Quote:
This ensures all cars travel at 60kph, and is policed by the timing computer so there is no ignoring. The lap positions stay the same, so there is no disadvantage to competitors (see LeMans this year for their safety car disadvantages). Equally, though there is not a big gap created by the safety car/crocodile, nor is there a chance of a fast car leaving the pits and trying to catch the train going through the incident site at near race speed - always a worry under safety car. Using safety vehicles to direct traffic works well on ovals and road courses in N.America, where drivers have been brought up in that philosophy. However for British circuits there are usually no spaces to station these vehicles round the track. |
||||
__________________
Play Safe, Bob The Race Gypsy |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Rules] Safety car - now not "releasing" lapped cars? | Sodemo | Formula One | 9 | 21 Apr 2010 18:27 |
Should SPEED CHANNEL have a "F1 Edition" much like "Nascar Edition"? | schuey01 | Formula One | 9 | 8 Jul 2004 19:50 |
Safety Car Speed in general | Phoenix1 | Formula One | 14 | 25 May 2004 12:15 |
Safety first?? Reliability more important than speed?? | Tristan | Formula One | 2 | 29 Nov 2002 20:47 |