Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Baltic Touring Car Championship Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Touring Car Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 Aug 2000, 14:59 (Ref:29348)   #1
fatbloke
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
********
Posts: 598
fatbloke should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am told that drivers must drop four of their results from the TOCA championship this year - is this correct ? If so, how will it affect the championship ? Surely Anthony 'Mr Consistent' Reid will sh1t out due to this rule, maybe MULLER could benefit as he drops some of his DNF's...
fatbloke is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Aug 2000, 15:51 (Ref:29355)   #2
Andy H
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location:
UK
Posts: 482
Andy H should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
you are correct fb, here's a list drivers who still can end up dropping points:


REID 2 [5,6]
MENU 1 [2]
MULLER 1 [3]
PLATO 1 [3]
TARQUINI 1 [3]
NEAL 1 [1]

The first number after the name is the no. of races from which they drop points, should they finish all six remaining races.

The numbers in square brackets represent there worst scores.

eg. if Reid and Menu both finish all the last six rounds Reid drops 11 to Menu's 2.


The bottom line appears to be Reidy has far more to lose than anyone else.
Andy H is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Aug 2000, 17:30 (Ref:29826)   #3
Les
Veteran
 
Les's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Kenya
Suffolk,UK
Posts: 2,155
Les should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What's the reasoning behind dropping scores?
Les is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Aug 2000, 21:02 (Ref:30021)   #4
Danielsun
Veteran
 
Danielsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 876
Danielsun should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I notice that our dear Rickard has nothing to lose, so to speak. I wholly blame that on the Prodrive team for their cheating throughout the year, and to Reid, who deserves at least - well - all of the blame for some of Rickard's no-scores...
Danielsun is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Aug 2000, 11:48 (Ref:30414)   #5
Andy H
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location:
UK
Posts: 482
Andy H should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Les - the rationale is for punishing dull gits who finish every race but don't win many


F1 used to have a similar rule, I think it was best 11 races from 16 - they got rid of it some while back though
Andy H is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Aug 2000, 20:58 (Ref:30961)   #6
Danielsun
Veteran
 
Danielsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 876
Danielsun should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
...the rationale is for punishing dull gits who finish every race but don't win many...
You mean drivers like Reid's an arse -- I mean, Anthony Reid?

I do remember when F1 used to do that - back in the late 1980s and early '90s that system was used - and yes it was best 11 from 16.
Danielsun is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2000, 13:24 (Ref:31431)   #7
ganda123
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location:
Chichester, England
Posts: 161
ganda123 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Rickard's luckless year might just do him a favour now as both his teammates will have to drop points and he won't. I live in hope...
Reid is an oaf. It was his fault Rickard lost a certain win and second at Silverstone. He tapped his rear in the sprint, making him have to pit to have the rear bumper removed when he was leading. Then he is disqualified in the feature for his rear wing being 1mm (!) out. Apparently this is also caused by his taps from behind in the sprint. Nice one Reidy. Grrr...
ganda123 is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2000, 13:27 (Ref:31432)   #8
ganda123
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location:
Chichester, England
Posts: 161
ganda123 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And before I forget:
Quote:
Originally posted by Andy H
Les - the rationale is for punishing dull gits who finish every race but don't win many
Couldn't have said it better myself Andy!

ganda123 is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2000, 16:47 (Ref:31443)   #9
fatbloke
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
********
Posts: 598
fatbloke should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Really ? I thought it was to stop a particular car totally running away with the series as Nissan did last year.
fatbloke is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2000, 18:20 (Ref:31653)   #10
ganda123
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location:
Chichester, England
Posts: 161
ganda123 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Not really - they've had the drop score system for a while I think, abnd Nissan still ran away with it in '99. The ballast's meant to stop that problem. Certainly in '98 a few people were worried that Rydell would lose out as he was quite consistent (but did win a few unlike someone I can think of!) but he was OK in the end, he'd retired enough.
ganda123 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trans Am dropped. Fogelhund ChampCar World Series 24 25 Dec 2005 15:53
DTM Avignon dropped mcurtis26 Touring Car Racing 29 17 Jun 2005 02:48
Dropped Scores AndyF National & Club Racing 4 31 Oct 2002 22:57
dropped scores? RIKB Touring Car Racing 2 4 Dec 2000 22:40


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.