|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
9 Aug 2000, 14:59 (Ref:29348) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 598
|
I am told that drivers must drop four of their results from the TOCA championship this year - is this correct ? If so, how will it affect the championship ? Surely Anthony 'Mr Consistent' Reid will sh1t out due to this rule, maybe MULLER could benefit as he drops some of his DNF's...
|
||
|
9 Aug 2000, 15:51 (Ref:29355) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 482
|
you are correct fb, here's a list drivers who still can end up dropping points:
REID 2 [5,6] MENU 1 [2] MULLER 1 [3] PLATO 1 [3] TARQUINI 1 [3] NEAL 1 [1] The first number after the name is the no. of races from which they drop points, should they finish all six remaining races. The numbers in square brackets represent there worst scores. eg. if Reid and Menu both finish all the last six rounds Reid drops 11 to Menu's 2. The bottom line appears to be Reidy has far more to lose than anyone else. |
||
|
11 Aug 2000, 17:30 (Ref:29826) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,155
|
What's the reasoning behind dropping scores?
|
||
|
12 Aug 2000, 21:02 (Ref:30021) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 876
|
I notice that our dear Rickard has nothing to lose, so to speak. I wholly blame that on the Prodrive team for their cheating throughout the year, and to Reid, who deserves at least - well - all of the blame for some of Rickard's no-scores...
|
||
|
14 Aug 2000, 11:48 (Ref:30414) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 482
|
Les - the rationale is for punishing dull gits who finish every race but don't win many
F1 used to have a similar rule, I think it was best 11 races from 16 - they got rid of it some while back though |
||
|
16 Aug 2000, 20:58 (Ref:30961) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 876
|
Quote:
I do remember when F1 used to do that - back in the late 1980s and early '90s that system was used - and yes it was best 11 from 16. |
|||
|
19 Aug 2000, 13:24 (Ref:31431) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 161
|
Rickard's luckless year might just do him a favour now as both his teammates will have to drop points and he won't. I live in hope...
Reid is an oaf. It was his fault Rickard lost a certain win and second at Silverstone. He tapped his rear in the sprint, making him have to pit to have the rear bumper removed when he was leading. Then he is disqualified in the feature for his rear wing being 1mm (!) out. Apparently this is also caused by his taps from behind in the sprint. Nice one Reidy. Grrr... |
||
|
19 Aug 2000, 13:27 (Ref:31432) | #8 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 161
|
And before I forget:
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 Aug 2000, 16:47 (Ref:31443) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 598
|
Really ? I thought it was to stop a particular car totally running away with the series as Nissan did last year.
|
||
|
20 Aug 2000, 18:20 (Ref:31653) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 161
|
Not really - they've had the drop score system for a while I think, abnd Nissan still ran away with it in '99. The ballast's meant to stop that problem. Certainly in '98 a few people were worried that Rydell would lose out as he was quite consistent (but did win a few unlike someone I can think of!) but he was OK in the end, he'd retired enough.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trans Am dropped. | Fogelhund | ChampCar World Series | 24 | 25 Dec 2005 15:53 |
DTM Avignon dropped | mcurtis26 | Touring Car Racing | 29 | 17 Jun 2005 02:48 |
Dropped Scores | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 4 | 31 Oct 2002 22:57 |
dropped scores? | RIKB | Touring Car Racing | 2 | 4 Dec 2000 22:40 |