|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Apr 2013, 20:47 (Ref:3229293) | #26 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,032
|
Quote:
these teams have spent a lot of money on wind tunnels and computers and have hired a lot of staff. any massive reduction in aero would mean a lot of wasted capacity and unemployed people. i think thats their vested interest in keeping it. that and if you have Ferrari or RB money why give up the advantage. massive budget reductions would solve spending on aero but still do little to keep people working. i suppose someone could just design a better race car but the rules are too restrictive for that to happen too. DRS is actually a fairly good compromise imo. |
|||
|
4 Apr 2013, 21:43 (Ref:3229318) | #27 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 591
|
Quote:
Whatever the reasons, massive aero is here to stay unfortunately. |
|||
|
2 May 2013, 20:49 (Ref:3241910) | #28 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,719
|
Autosport and Racer have published some comments on the effects of DRS:
Quote:
The problem is that DRS has devalued races. Overtakes are too easy, there's no real fights anymore. |
|||
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed! by NaBUrean Prodooktionz naburu38.itch.io |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Tech Issue] Double DRS banned for 2013 | Marbot | Formula One | 67 | 14 Aug 2012 08:09 |
[Tech Issue] DRS ban in Monaco tunnel? | Marbot | Formula One | 21 | 25 May 2011 13:31 |
DRS system, | Peter Ford | Formula One | 2 | 24 May 2011 02:10 |
DRS to be banned.... | Mr V | Formula One | 116 | 9 May 2011 17:05 |