|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
14 Dec 2002, 04:43 (Ref:449596) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 328
|
'05 rule idea
why run a turbo 4 motor it workrd for f1 in the past maybe have run say 750-1000hp with a 45cm inlet restrictor with a single turbo maker for all manufactors the idea of control parts say gearboxes electronics and other minor yet pricy items oh with the smaller motor maybe it could be good for the safety they could put the driver futher back in the car? just a thought
|
|
__________________
"sicken your mind and your driving will follow" Klaus "the King" Ludwig |
14 Dec 2002, 06:21 (Ref:449626) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
Most of the turbo engines in F1 were V6s or V8s.
A stock-block straight four is barely smaller than a purebred CART V8. Thanks for contributing, though... It's always good to get more people in on the discussion. BTW, _please_ try to use some punctuation... |
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
15 Dec 2002, 12:20 (Ref:450342) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
I'm not sure that many of the turbo's used in F1 were V8s, maybe the Alfa Romeo one?
The BMW turbo was a 4 cylinder. |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
15 Dec 2002, 12:56 (Ref:450367) | #4 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 94
|
A V4 engine would be shorter than a V8!
|
||
|
15 Dec 2002, 14:37 (Ref:450411) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
Uhm... Nobody makes a V4, except maybe for motorcycles.
Subaru alone makes a flat-four. All others are inline. In F1, during the turbo era, Honda, Porsche, Ferrari, Ford, Motori Moderni, and Renault used V6s, so yeah, I stand corrected, no V8s that I could find evidence of. Hart and BMW used 4-cylinders (The Megatron was simply a BMW re-branded once BMW had halted their factory involvement). Last edited by Lee Janotta; 15 Dec 2002 at 14:42. |
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
15 Dec 2002, 20:03 (Ref:450581) | #6 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
http://www.fulvia.nl/pages/enginec.htm Quote:
Quote:
http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/con-alfa.html http://www.bnw4u.de/~wernheye/Deutsch/AlfaF1.html Alfa were also working on a in-line 4 (had running prototype) at the time of the FIAT takeover, but FIAT wanted only one of their car companies (Ferrari) in F1, so the project was canned. Agree about V8 not being much larger than an in-line four. For the same capacity the smaller bores would mean a shorter cylinder head and shorter stroke should mean a lower engine. If you want to reduce cost you need to control the physical dimensions. i.e. don't let the engine builders play around with 90, 80 and 75degree V8's. Tell them it has to be 90degree with certain bore spacing and regulate the engine and transmission mounting points so there is (almost) no need to redesign the car to take next years engine..... or another suppliers engine. Last edited by alfasud; 15 Dec 2002 at 20:05. |
|||||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
107% rule | roys1 | Formula One | 5 | 20 Mar 2005 12:59 |
An Idea............. | DanJR1 | National & International Single Seaters | 7 | 7 Jun 2003 10:14 |
The FIA rule | eatapc | Formula One | 24 | 27 Jun 2001 22:40 |
An Idea | Raoul Duke | Formula One | 18 | 8 Jun 2001 15:04 |