|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Jan 2016, 13:43 (Ref:3604021) | #2626 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
They would have had done this with or without the ACO anyway (maybe not P2 base per say, but the same hollow external body on top of near spec chassis and bop specs a la DP continuum)
I never wanted this series to exist in the first place, so it's little late for wishes |
|
|
12 Jan 2016, 14:29 (Ref:3604028) | #2627 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 797
|
What the timeline means is that there won't be any new cars available until end of Dec/early Jan 2017 for mid Jan roar? Bespoke engine and bodywork to follow? Only if everything is an schedule. This is reminiscent of Nissan cool -aid! Reality - Daytona 2017 and maybe later will be all grandfathered and great grandfathered Ps - including DPs
|
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 14:35 (Ref:3604033) | #2628 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 276
|
The manufacturer bodywork idea is a good one. As usual, the execution of the idea is garbage.
|
|
|
12 Jan 2016, 14:41 (Ref:3604039) | #2629 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
Could the series improve? Absolutely. Will I dismiss it out of hand because I don't agree with every regulation? No. Most of the top teams in ELMS are moving on, so it looks like open LMP2 is dead there because of the ACO's ridiculous protectionism of French manufacturers. Contrary to your belief, IMSA did not agree with making things spec, but there has been an increased interest in Le Mans from US-based teams like Shank and ESM. So some compromise had to be reached. Hence DPi. If you've read Marshall Pruett's series of articles on the subject you'd see why this happened. |
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 15:06 (Ref:3604045) | #2630 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Jan 2016, 15:13 (Ref:3604051) | #2631 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,234
|
|||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
12 Jan 2016, 15:26 (Ref:3604060) | #2632 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Because there isn't always just Option A (like it and watch) and Option B (hate it and don't watch). It isn't that black and white.
This I have repeated before too many times already, but: I can't say I ever really LIKED Grand-Am or even Daytona, I mean I found the concept rather awful by itself, but as side dish to the ALMS it was alright. You always knew there was one awesome series in the neighborhood, so it was fine watching some "entertainment racing" between weekends and whatever. At some point I actually watched couple Rolex seasons that way. It was fine, you didn't really have to take the thing seriously. But when you lose the main dish and instead move some tiny leftover parts of that to the side dish, and that's all there is, the joy is gone. What is left is the (admittedly awesome) calendar and range of support series, with some ocassional brighter flashes of something, but they don't save any sinking ships. For the record, after years of full season NA racing following, I did watch around half or more of the USCC events in 2014, then only two last year, so it is going your direction of desire anyway with me. But even though I don't watch much of it doesn't mean I couldn't follow news and comment here. I really liked PLM last year, despite some questionable officiliating things again, but that was mostly because of the bizarre weather havoc racing + DP+/Conti upset by GT + my love for Road Atlanta Last edited by Deleted; 12 Jan 2016 at 15:37. |
|
|
12 Jan 2016, 15:28 (Ref:3604061) | #2633 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 338
|
Why is anyone here? Put on your big boy pants.
|
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 15:37 (Ref:3604067) | #2634 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,943
|
IMSA may have better tracks than most of the WEC rounds, especially if the WEC keep the relatively boring Tilke tracks such as Shanghai (only interesting because it's bumpy and has 1-2 strange/interesting corners on it), Bahrain (bland lay out) and his butchering of Fuji (can't entirely blame him for that, since Toyota own Fuji and paid for the redesign to get a F1 race there for a couple of years). But the whole prototype field from day one in 2014 was a compromised mish-mash.
I'd love to see LMP1 cars running in IMSA on the NA tracks, but the reality of that is a pipe dream--at least until IMSA collapses and sell the series to the ACO as some doom sayers are thinking will happen, and it very well might--no one knows what the future holds or how things will work out. Audi, Porsche and Toyota aren't selling customer cars, even if they did, they'd be practically unaffordable. Also, at times even last season, the LMP1 privateer cars were sometimes not too much faster than ACO spec LMP2 cars. So unless the LMP1 privateer teams get a major speed boost, that's not a strong selling point, either. Face it, with as half-baked and especially rushed as the original merger was, this is about the best IMSA can do right now. Love it or loathe it, but it's all we have right now. And it's not like the factory teams would be willing to bank roll an IMSA LMP1 class--why do you think that Audi pulled out of the ALMS full time after 2008? They won about everything there was to win and the ROI wasn't doing it for Audi of America. Also, around that time, the World Championship (ultimately evolving into the ACO/FIA World Endurance Championship) that Audi were asking for since at least LM in 2000 was gathering momentum. So this is what we have now. And if you like it, you'd better appreciate it while we have it, because it can be succeeded by something better--or, perhaps, something worse. |
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 15:42 (Ref:3604071) | #2635 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Doom Sayers we're right about Nissan, and Ratel's GTWC, so every once in a while things do fall apart as predicted/feared/hoped. But the likelihood of AMA situation repeat here is awfully low, and other scenarios even more so.
I think this series is more likely to be here in 2025 than WEC for example... in current form, anyway |
|
|
12 Jan 2016, 15:49 (Ref:3604073) | #2636 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,102
|
Quote:
IMSA will survive in its current form because it doesn't have a current form. It's whatever they want it to be. Whether that's a good thing or not is an opinion. |
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 16:02 (Ref:3604079) | #2637 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
|
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 16:29 (Ref:3604092) | #2638 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,482
|
Nonsense.
A better product can be produced by: - more liberal top class regulations. Unlimited number of chassis constructors and allow tire competition, free up engine-bodywork combos; - replace IMSA FCY procedures with Code 60/slow zones; - get a better TV package - change manufacturers marketing policy to allow more brands 4 straight forward changes that will make the series great (again). Not hard at all. But there has to be a desire... |
|
|
12 Jan 2016, 16:40 (Ref:3604098) | #2639 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
You won't get no-FCY at North America because of the marshall/personell insurance debacles, but you certainly could get reasonable FCYs instead of NASCAR-FCYs for phantom debris and coke cans, as well as the laughable 20 minute wave arounds.
|
|
|
12 Jan 2016, 17:05 (Ref:3604105) | #2640 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,943
|
Quote:
Also, I should point out that though it's by default and not by rules, LMP1 is basically a Michelin spec tire class and LMP2 is almost a Dunlop spec tire class as far as those suppliers dominating those respective classes. Also, the WEC also has full course yellows and pace cars. Only difference is that the WEC uses slow zones at LM and bigger tracks on their schedule, and if a FCY can be dealt with quickly, they won't send out the pace car. TV Package? No motorsport in the world in the US won't get on mainstream TV as long as NASCAR and F1 are around. If you want that to happen, you'd better hope that Brian France runs NASCAR into the ground and that the FIA and FOM do the same with F1. Only reason why the WEC's TV package is better is that Fox uses RLM's broadcasts for commentary and most WEC races are shown at night or early in the morning, hence they face little direct competition from other sports that Fox shoehorns on FS1 and FS2, and can be shown in their entirety--not even Le Mans is able to get that now. And the only way that the manufacturing marketing stuff will change is if IMSA and ISC drop it, namely the pay to play format. That's the only thing I can see change being successfully forced though. But we have to remember that when Don Panoz still owned the ALMS, he cut his own personal funding of the series after '06 and had the OEM's do that, and we know what happened when Audi and Porsche cut back their LMP programs at the end of '08. And Jim France and ISC probably got tired of being accused of partially subsidizing many of the teams in GA (which we now know is true and is public knowledge thanks to Felix Sabates in a deposition he put in against his then estranged wife during their divorce trial), and he wanted someone, even if only for image's sake, to foot the bill. In short, as long as Jim's and Don's mentalities don't change, the whole pay to play stuff, especially in GTD, won't change. So this is what we're stuck with, for better or worse, and I've seen enough happen in the sportscar and motorsports world as a whole the past 15+ years, especially the last 5-7 years, to know that when change comes, there's a good chance that things will probably be worse than it was before. |
|||
|
12 Jan 2016, 18:45 (Ref:3604125) | #2641 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,567
|
Pt 2 of the 2017 article on S365
http://sportscar365.com/industry/ins...ulations-pt-2/ More info on the timeline for testing and whatnot. |
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 19:03 (Ref:3604129) | #2642 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 317
|
My view is (and has been for some time) that IMSA abandon the LMPs in favor of Class One-based big-bore GTs. I believe they have far better odds of growing the sport and ensuring financial stability with those cars than the psuedo-spec P2s. These new cars are an absolute joke, lipstick on a pig in the very greatest sense of the term.
|
||
|
12 Jan 2016, 19:45 (Ref:3604139) | #2643 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,943
|
Quote:
What's it been said that if we don't learn from history, we're doomed to repeat it? I can see the same happening here, especially if rules are kept as liberal as they were in the mid '90s where teams basically designed race cars first, and then modified them to be theoretically road legal. |
|||
|
12 Jan 2016, 19:47 (Ref:3604140) | #2644 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
||
|
13 Jan 2016, 04:24 (Ref:3604266) | #2645 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,583
|
I think only a few tracks on the calendar are good or great. Road America being my favorite. Places like Sebring, Laguna Seca and VIR have history, but there isn't much about them that's unseen in tracks the wec race on. The biggest thing is the lack of runoff that everyone complains about. If there was a partial concrete race track in China with the same layout and roughness as Sebring, we'd have completely different comments about it. Imo, it's mostly history that makes people feel like an otherwise typical place is a great. WTSC has some good tracks, but I don't think places like Fuji or Silverstone are ruined because of runoff. Besides, this is a regional series, not a World series. They can run any American track loyal to Nascar. That's not an option for the FIA.
|
|
|
13 Jan 2016, 05:05 (Ref:3604271) | #2646 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,482
|
Quote:
Have fun at your beloved parking lots! |
||
|
13 Jan 2016, 05:59 (Ref:3604281) | #2647 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
It's not really just runoff for me that's the problem for Grade 1 tracks but those awkward slow curves they put in to scrub speed off of Formula 1 based cars.
In my own opinion,COTA I think is a really great track, for F1. But when you put slower heavier GT and Prototypes cars there, I don't know, it just looks...awkward. |
|
|
13 Jan 2016, 06:45 (Ref:3604284) | #2648 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,583
|
Quote:
So what's the negativity for? Sorry I'm not seeing the point in you saying things like not having me in attendance benefits you. There isn't even any track near me wtsc or the wec races. So if I go to a race, it's basically a vacation. If I'm spending money for that, it better be a place I'd like to see with cars I'd like to see. I'm sure a lot of people feel the same thing. |
||
|
13 Jan 2016, 07:35 (Ref:3604297) | #2649 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Jan 2016, 08:19 (Ref:3604306) | #2650 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
Quote:
Quote:
Privateer P1 is not happening as long as it's a WEC only class. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2016 Moto GP | macca | Bike Racing | 4 | 17 Mar 2016 22:36 |
IndyCar + LMP1 + Formula E -> IMSA CanAm 2017 | NaBUru38 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 12 | 26 Apr 2013 15:58 |
2013-2017 V8SA Tyre Tender | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 6 | 23 Mar 2011 20:39 |