|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
30 Dec 2006, 02:56 (Ref:1801602) | #251 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
At last check Lola would build a new Lola champcar for $650,000.
For what you get from Panoz compared to the cost of other cars I think it is very reasonable. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
30 Dec 2006, 14:45 (Ref:1801790) | #252 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Keep in mind....
Dispute the content of the post, and do not attack the poster.... I don't want to have to warn people or sanction anyone on this.... Keep it clean and above board in your responses... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
30 Dec 2006, 15:18 (Ref:1801800) | #253 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Any idea, mountainstar, what is included in the Lola roller vs the Panoz?
Historically, Lola has always been pricey. I remember back in the day their sports racers were always more expensive than the competition - not that they were bad cars - Carl Haas has been involved for so long I wonder how much of the "cost" was his markup as importer. The Panoz is a direct sale with no middle man, correct? |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
30 Dec 2006, 16:24 (Ref:1801819) | #254 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
John, true that Haas' markup on chassis and parts made team accountants wince for years.
But I don't think it's a direct sale for the DP-01 to teams from Panoz. It seems it goes through CC and some have mentioned that CC has a leasing deal in place for 'em. I doubt that CC is going to make much of a profit off of them, if any, but it seems very likely that CC had to guarantee Panoz "X" number of car sales itself in order for Panoz to take on the project. |
|
|
30 Dec 2006, 16:48 (Ref:1801830) | #255 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 Dec 2006, 17:31 (Ref:1801853) | #256 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 478
|
It is not so negative in my opinion. Do you think that Panoz and Lola would have been as eager to completely resdesign a chasis if they were not going to be the sole provider? So it is a guarntee in a way in my opinion. On the note of delivering the 35 other chasis, I remain optomisitc although Panoz was late on the first order of ten deliverred. Remember they were tentatively schedule for end of November. Happy New Year
|
||
__________________
racinthestreets "If dreams don't come true - are they lies?" The Boss |
30 Dec 2006, 19:06 (Ref:1801902) | #257 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Well, it definitely is not poppycock that Haas added a considerable markup on the Lola parts - he always has. One of the initial concerns when this was put out to bid so to speak was that Haas would get mad and go away if he could not be "sole supplier" as he was for the old chassis. That markup paid for a lot of cigars!
I can't speak specifically to the Panoz deal but I do know that when you are asking someone to construct something as a special order, you have to guarantee them a minimum purchase. Yes, this is a good opportunity for Panoz, but they also would want to be able to recoup their fixed costs in tooling for the chassis/tub, suspension bits, body work etc. Very little of the car is going to be "off the shelf" or have any use anywhere else. Speculating that this is the case is not being negative at all - it is just sound business. If I were a potential supplier I would want to be sure I was going to at least break even. Don't forget, all discussion of the long term viability of the series aside, CC could decide to add suppliers or even change the car dramatically in the relative near term. There is no guarantee that Panoz will be the sole supplier in perpetuity. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
30 Dec 2006, 22:48 (Ref:1801981) | #258 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
What's "negative" about it? "Negative" for who?
The Panoz guy's quote before the cars were delivered said "subject to payment." Do you think that each team brought a check to the truck driver? They were delivered to CC HQ. CC awarded the deal and commissioned the cars solely to Panoz. Just a business deal. |
|
|
31 Dec 2006, 14:48 (Ref:1802228) | #259 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,739
|
Quote:
We'll all see our favorite teams roll off in Vegas. |
|||
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !" |
31 Dec 2006, 14:51 (Ref:1802230) | #260 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Actually it makes sense if CC is going to be leasing the cars to the teams or at least making them available for lease that the cars would be delivered to CC's headquarters. CC would contract with Panoz, pay them, then lease or sell outright to Newman/Haas or whomever. Then that income would allow them to recoup their investment.
Although it would be neat to see someone hand the driver a Cashier's Check for $200 and whatever thousand for delivery of: "Racecar, Panoz DP-01 - Quantity: One." And yes, I agree that the production/delivery seems on track. As enemy-ace note these are complex vehicles. You just can't slap them together and sort it out later - they need to be right from the factory. As they get familiar with their own processes I am sure the subsequent batches of cars will arrive in a more rapid manner. Last edited by JohnSSC; 31 Dec 2006 at 14:54. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
31 Dec 2006, 15:03 (Ref:1802237) | #261 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
Will the teams be able to put their own winglets on the cars which I think Newman/haas did? evolving the car to an extent?
|
||
|
31 Dec 2006, 15:32 (Ref:1802259) | #262 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 257
|
That is an interesting question Luke. To what extent can modifications or additions be made?
|
||
|
31 Dec 2006, 15:41 (Ref:1802264) | #263 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 737
|
I may be wrong (not the first time) but I seem to recall that no changes would be allowed. To me that is wrong probably because I was always playing with winglets,bodywork, revising airflow ducting and other little tweaks. Some worked some didn't but it was always a challenge, especially without a wind tunnel.
|
||
__________________
I am really just like a little kitten. Just a baby Puma! |
31 Dec 2006, 16:47 (Ref:1802326) | #264 | |
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 230
|
It'll be like GP2 - you can change the setup, but only with the parts provided
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Team USA performance | Mystery | A1GP | 39 | 14 Dec 2005 17:10 |
Team USA First Test in New Zeland | Zinger | National & International Single Seaters | 52 | 19 Jan 2004 07:50 |
No Team Red Bull USA? Sponsorship for Herta? | Lee Janotta | Formula One | 3 | 14 Sep 2002 19:18 |
Red Bull Team USA | shiny side up! | Formula One | 21 | 20 Jul 2002 10:14 |
NZ Trans Am team to tackle USA | marcus | Sportscar & GT Racing | 13 | 4 Nov 2000 22:27 |