|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
1 Oct 2010, 09:53 (Ref:2767665) | #251 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Quote:
|
||
|
1 Oct 2010, 12:51 (Ref:2767729) | #252 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
The new car has to pay it's way so will be for customers. In GTE there are plans to allow more powerful engines, capping top speeds with limiters. This is needed as cars like the Ferrari 458 and Mclaren MP4 are coming. |
||
|
1 Oct 2010, 13:30 (Ref:2767745) | #253 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
If LFA participates in GTE, it is likely to become participation by the LEXUS brand.
Toyota will do the motor sports activity by the TOYOTA brand, too. |
|
|
1 Oct 2010, 19:00 (Ref:2767876) | #254 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,532
|
Here's rather wild, but maybe realistic guess.
Toyota develop an LFA LMGT and enter the LMIC, while another team (Maybe Vitaphone) convert a few spare LFA LMGT's to GT1 spec. It's pie in the sky. |
||
__________________
Entire team is babies. |
2 Oct 2010, 02:07 (Ref:2768012) | #255 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
Quote:
Toyota-WRC? And if the cars have to pay for themsleves then GT-E would make more sense as there would be more of a market for the GT-E LFA as opposed to GT1 where they might sell four at the most to Vitaphone and possibly Triple H. Well hopefully the LFA ends up in at least one of those classes. |
|||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
2 Oct 2010, 02:29 (Ref:2768019) | #256 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
|
Depending on the degree to which Toyota branding is involved with the Rebellion programme, there could be economies of scale in getting involved with GTE. These would not reveal themselves in the competition front, but rather in the marketing front. If Toyota wants to get involved as a race or series sponsor (which could be good for the LMS too), then it would increase its relevant exposure and thus its likelihood of investment if it had more cars running, particularly one which actually looked like a road car! As Japanese Samurai mentions, it could also capitalize on Lexus and Toyota branding synchronously.
|
||
|
2 Oct 2010, 17:29 (Ref:2768264) | #257 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 614
|
Quote:
I think they want the car to win, rather than sell as many as possible. I really doubt the LFA venture would be about making the car pay for itself. |
||
|
3 Oct 2010, 05:51 (Ref:2768541) | #258 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
Yeah, I think they're interested in GT1 because of the fact that Nissan has the GTR in there as well. GTE in LMS or LeMans is good, but how many races will it see? Is there more racing in LMS or GT1? I know there might be more of an audience for LMS or LeMans, but GT1 might grow to be pretty popular, and since Toyota officials have been in attendance at a few of the past races in GT1, I think it speaks that they're interested. Although they were involved with future regs of LeMans also, weren't they?
|
|
|
3 Oct 2010, 11:57 (Ref:2768602) | #259 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Quote:
I'm no expert on the GT1 championship but I don't see where the new cars are coming from. So maybe Toyota but where that series goes in the future I have no idea.Most of the field was outdated three years ago. |
||
|
3 Oct 2010, 13:11 (Ref:2768621) | #260 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
I think they could easily run the GT1 series with a mildly modified GTE-car, so that's - strictly speaking - not a case of one series or the other...
|
||
|
3 Oct 2010, 13:16 (Ref:2768622) | #261 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
||
|
3 Oct 2010, 14:58 (Ref:2768650) | #262 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 614
|
||
|
3 Oct 2010, 15:16 (Ref:2768661) | #263 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
Quote:
Nothing has been decided for sure as it will all be thrashed out at a meeting in Japan later this month. |
||
|
4 Oct 2010, 03:40 (Ref:2768889) | #264 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 614
|
^ Believe me when I tell you they wont be producing/selling any LFAs to go racing on that, lest they be running around the prototypes they have running around now.
|
|
|
5 Oct 2010, 00:00 (Ref:2769508) | #265 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
Quote:
GT1 might have older cars, but the F430 the Porsche GT3 the M3GT2 are all pretty much the same cars as 3 or 4 years ago. So where do you get off saying GT1 is old cars? What NEW cars are in LMS? The 458 won't make it's debut until next year. They still have Ford GT's running in GT2 in ALMS. So you never know. GT1 could potentially be a hit if it's played right. I don't see why not. The GTR is a new car, the B6 next year will be 'new', as would an LFA. How many new GT's will be LeMans or LMS or ALMS next season? |
||
|
5 Oct 2010, 21:37 (Ref:2769994) | #266 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
A company like Toyota will also factor in the use of hybrid technology and alternative fuels when considering what kind of GT car they want to respresent the brand. Like it or not a few years down the line it may be frowned upon to campaign big engined racing cars with no consideration for green technology. Much as we love them the V12 Murcielago looks like a dinosaur from a bygone era when put up against the Porsche hybrid or E85 Corvette. The fact I am reelling off terms like E85 show how the marketing speak sinks in after a while! This applies equally to Nissan who I think it's fair to say rather misjudged the GT landscape when they gave the green light to the GT1 GT-R..............or perhaps they simply saw an opportunity to build a low budget parts bin special? Last edited by JAG; 5 Oct 2010 at 21:46. |
||
|
5 Oct 2010, 22:03 (Ref:2770005) | #267 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
I agree with JAG if I was Toyota I know where I'd go. The fact the racing is so thrilling over long distances and the marketability that comes from some of the prestige events and beating the competition. And in terms of longevity. There's no competition.
Quite simply I'm not a fan of the GT1 Championship. It's fine how it is as a retirement home for these once great vehicles. But to actually build something specifically to join that championship now? Smaller projects like the Alpina fair enough. Toyota should have loftier ambitions for a return to sportscars. |
|
|
5 Oct 2010, 23:40 (Ref:2770037) | #268 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
I really just laugh at the 'green' movement. No racing is 'green' no matter what fuel or what technology you use. KERS, great! Diesel, sure! Thing is, Toyota was spotted in the paddock at more than one GT1 race. They were also at LeMans. That's not saying they can't do both. I'd rather see them in GT1 because of the restrictions placed upon the GTE(2) cars. FIA isn't small, the ACO isn't either. But to think that the FIA will let GT1 die is just dumb. If anything GT3 might be the new GT1. Mercedes is there with their SLS, Nissan is there with their GTR, Audi is there with their R8, it goes on. Corvette is there, Lamborghini is there, Alpina BMW is there, Aston Martin is there. GT2 is great but GT3/1 is bigger. Don't let the attendance fool you. There's just as many if not more people that show up to FIA GT racing as there is LMS racing events. With plans to expand the calendar next year and include canada and the US and China, I don't see how a 5 or 6 race calendar with LMS will stack up, ILMC is great and all but that's the same too, 6 rounds. ALMS isn't really looking like it's in the picture for Toyota right now either. ALMS is nothing compared to the NASCAR attendance, and Denny Hamlin and Kyle Busch are two of the best in NASCAR, they've got the US covered in that front. While I like LeMans style racing, ALMS isn't true endurance events. 3 hour races? That's a short NASCAR race without many cautions. The big races are the First (sebring) Middle being LeMans and last (Petit). You see where 3 BIG races is, and then you see where a WORLD championship is.
I know there's GT1 haters on here but High-Powered super cars or GT's aren't going away, sorry. Lamborghini, that's their business, Aston Martin as well, Ferrari is High-powered cars and GT's also. You see where I'm coming from? |
|
|
6 Oct 2010, 00:30 (Ref:2770051) | #269 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
Shill! L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
6 Oct 2010, 02:15 (Ref:2770066) | #270 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
The ILMC/ALMS is were manufactuers go to prove their cutting edge technology in front of a world audience, the FIA GT1 series is where old cars go to get pensioned off. There's room for both I'm just asking what is the best arena for a manufactuer like Toyota. |
||
|
6 Oct 2010, 14:32 (Ref:2770347) | #271 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 614
|
Quote:
|
||
|
7 Oct 2010, 01:23 (Ref:2770619) | #272 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
Horn, no one is speaking about GT1 at LeMans. Is that all you do is go to LeMans in every post against GT1? I guess to you there is no other sports car racing that matters besides LeMans huh? How about Maserati? They haven't gone to LeMans with their MC12, well they weren't even allowed to run the MC12, but has that hurt them? They've won numerous FIA GT championships, and it looks as if they'll add this year's GT1 Championship to their tally. Maybe their shills too? I don't seek your approval with my comments. I'm not worried about your opinions on GT1. I'd rather see GT1 alive and well racing in it's own series than it being dead. If that's not what you think, that's great, move on.
And Gazoo racing is Toyota backed like I said. They are apart of Toyota but they're not considered Toyota Motorsports, you speak as if they're the factory effort. That's like Aston Martin and Young Driver. They are Toyota backed, that doesn't mean they aren't apart of Toyota or a Toyota company. I never said they weren't. Obviously they have to be if they were racing LFA's before it was even sold to the public. I'd like to see them in both series. If they choose to go to one I'd rather it be GT1. I am a fan of the GT1 racing, and no it's not perfect but nothing is. It's funny when you sign up for this site and you get people calling you a shill and trying to blast every comment you make because they don't like your opinions. I've been lingering around here for a while but I never signed up. I figured I would because I like the discussions, now I get blasted for reasons that are basically because of my opinion. I wasn't aware people's own views weren't allowed in these forums. Maybe I should re-read the rules of this site. |
|
|
7 Oct 2010, 02:10 (Ref:2770629) | #273 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
7 Oct 2010, 02:37 (Ref:2770636) | #274 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
I spoke my opinion. I'd rather see them in GT1 than in GTE if they were to do one. If you thought I meant not in GTE altogether that's not what I was getting at. LeMans is viewed by a lot more people than FIA GT, true, but I'd still like to see the LFA in both. That's what I was getting at. I never said I'd rather see them in one or the other. I'd like both, but if they do only ONE, GT1 would be my choice because of the reasons I gave. I just hope GTE can become a more open class in terms of engine regulations. I mean the power they produce. It'd be great to see them running more than 500HP, of course with updates considered like paddle shifting, it would be closer to what these cars are on the street in terms of transmissions. So I'm not disagreeing with you, just stating that if Toyota enter the LFA, I think they should go both places. But a page or so back it was said that if they enter one instead of both, which would people rather see. I think GT1 for me. Just because I don't want to see the LFA's engine being restricted so much.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2010, 07:00 (Ref:2770691) | #275 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
GT1 is a dead class. It's being propped up by the arrogance of a man who can't accept he cannot force manufacturers into running years old cars and technology. If Toyota wants any relevance in sports car racing, they'll be running ALMS/LeMans. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ILMC 2011 Discussion | HORNDAWG | ACO Regulated Series | 692 | 13 Nov 2011 19:10 |
ILMC 2011 entries | The Badger | ACO Regulated Series | 29 | 17 Dec 2010 23:43 |
’10 ALMS Finale • Petit Le Mans • '10 ILMC Round 2 Sept. 29th – Oct. 2nd | HORNDAWG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 570 | 17 Oct 2010 19:22 |
Formula Le Mans LMS feeder series | dak1111 | ACO Regulated Series | 113 | 13 Nov 2009 18:03 |
LMS & Le Mans to be on Eurosport in 2008 | Mal | ACO Regulated Series | 255 | 17 Aug 2008 06:19 |