|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 May 2014, 01:04 (Ref:3407370) | #301 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Here drawings like two wings facing each other bellies they give huge wind acceleration and negative pressure which we introduce inside the wings. If the wings will be mounted permanently, with sufficient clearance between them, and may be greater plenty of slots, a big part of the lift force will turn on underpressure which will be inside the wings could create a fairly low pressure and large its quantitative yield .. If so it will already know how to use a vacuum with a good efficiency, for example by the vane pump is running, vacuum-as a motor ... the motor can drive the generators or.... propeller ...
Andrew |
||
|
18 May 2014, 01:08 (Ref:3407372) | #302 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
And now the strangest thing .. On the screen shots from the simulator to the airfoil published by NASA, pointed red frame so strange two values that can be set on the simulator .. Namely, in terms of drag and lift. and would not have believed in their value, if not the simulator, which included such a serious company like NASA .. In the first image you can see that the drag is set to 21 Newton.Lift has until 244 Newton .... So for the help of a smaller force is a much more powerful .. Something with anything ... this force is with 11.6 times greater than the resistance (drag).
In the second figure also drag is 12 Newtons, and lift 191 Newtons .. ie with 15.9 times greater .. I think that these simulations are accurate .. Now, if even half of the value obtained for lift holding strength to produce the drug's effects, it would lift force will be very high ... So we use 85 Newtons of lift to overcome the resistance (drag) 12 Newtons. that is enough for us to capture power efficiency, and conversion to drag about 14%. (eg rotary vane pump + propeller). I think it is really to do with such a small sufficient efficiency .. So the system can move itself by overcoming drag and float in the air At 85 Newtons lift .. I guess that NASA is wrong ... So says the theory ..... Andrew : D: D: D |
||
|
21 May 2014, 15:23 (Ref:3408718) | #303 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Rely on nice weather I visited on a walk Aviation Museum in Krakow, to see what's new, you can see .. Oh, and I saw a passenger plane Ilyushin Il-14, which was taken off the canopy flaps wings .. Turns out there can be visible between the ribs on the insert shapes Styrofoam quite calmly, there's nothing there, outside the free space .. judging by the number would be that of the keel cubic meters ....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilyushin_Il-14 Andrew |
||
|
31 May 2014, 09:44 (Ref:3413074) | #304 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Thanks Desmo of reminding us of the man who he liked the various interesting things to do ..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AeroVironment This V8 Fireworks do not read my posts carefully and do not know that the inside of the wings is ... nothing .. Well it looks like jeszce wing in cross-section, ie Naca Felix. and this is the name of the family that founded and requires determine what gaps, gfzie placed on which profiles also those bumps to the network, probably can be hundreds of types .. Here .. I will do my prototype which acts from the top of the second wing multiplied by quantity and quantity received vacuum .. Of course, you should quite carefully chosen angles of attack these wings and the distance between them .... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPZWUQlhvDA Then the pair of wings are fastened to the treadmill, instead of oxen to the appropriate spin speed and expected energy ....:hehe: Andrew |
||
|
9 Jun 2014, 17:00 (Ref:3417654) | #305 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
No, if anyone can stop the "Physics" from the next disaster? . I do not have the strength to tell you how you should do it ... with 2-meter tunnel adjacent to one another and having a hole at the top, through which a whole this stuff will affect them, and can be removed .. This method of freezing is crazy dangerous because it can destabilize the ground beneath the reactors .. Every physicist should know that water freezes into ice, its volume increases by 10% .. why iceberg floats .. ai thanks on the road doing spring breakthroughs .. and here such a "breakthrough" they want to do the reactors, which may lead them, the 40-meter deep freeze, to improve the soil by 10%, which is 4 meters .. what happens to them, it is not difficult to foresee * as it has imagination, and not just academic titles ... If someone does not know what it is ice here, please : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water .. Besides, this water accumulates on the ice must continue to have some outlet, because it is not a "black hole" ... Help!
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-23940214 Andrew |
||
|
11 Jun 2014, 09:25 (Ref:3418476) | #306 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Well, the couple is also reasonable and imagination of people .. I do not feel so lonely ..
http://enenews.com/japan-nuclear-pro...comment-531509 Andrew |
||
|
16 Jun 2014, 13:14 (Ref:3422602) | #307 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,164
|
Quote:
This does illustrate Bernoulli's principle very well and the design is identical to what has been used in automobile carburetor's for a long time. Have you calculated the efficiency of this method vs. traditional wind turbine? My guess is that traditional wind turbines would be more efficient. Continue to post, I always enjoy reading! Richard |
|
|
23 Jul 2014, 21:34 (Ref:3437137) | #308 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Here are many pictures of these in one movie ..
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=667344086668632 Andrew |
||
|
21 Aug 2014, 23:50 (Ref:3446107) | #309 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Here historical figure .. then only the best solution was graph paper .. Figure was every day for 1 month used, when did this lathe crankshaft. The crankshaft has five supports and four crank, 90 degrees .. starting weight of the material (iron containing 5% cobalt) was 80 kg (160 lb) is the world's first practical crankshaft timing ..
Andrew |
||
|
22 Aug 2014, 22:48 (Ref:3446365) | #310 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 (Ref:3472198) | #311 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
18 Nov 2014, 21:50 (Ref:3476382) | #312 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Here are the materials you can download a PDF of the conference .. I am at the end of the first day, as it was in the schedule
http://www.ukintpress-conferences.co...conf/index.php http://www.ukintpress-conferences.co...983&view=drill Andrew |
||
|
17 Dec 2014, 21:03 (Ref:3485858) | #313 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
25 Dec 2014, 01:23 (Ref:3487789) | #314 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Before I made with cast iron heads, first I made a model of plywood comp. as you can see, the intake windows were on both sides of the head., but as I started to count the inlet surfaces, it turned out that the total window area of the inlet, is much greater than the surface of the cylinder bore intake ... is 6.2 cm, or 30 cm surface .Circumference square of this cylinder is 19.5 cm, as you can see in the picture plywood3, windows may be by 2/3 of the circumference of the cylinder, which is 13 cm ..but they are high up on the 2.5 cm .. that is, their total area is 32 5 cm square ... so and so will be the smallest spot diameter of the cylinder inlet. The primary piston is only 1 cm bigger than the cylinder, so I thought that the windows on one side will be sufficient ..
Andrew Merry Christmas |
||
|
17 Jan 2015, 18:22 (Ref:3493629) | #315 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Please, just without the blades and the fan too ... Because, however, Dyson has propeller blades inside, only small ...And here's the real bladeless....
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/t...ss-ceiling-fan Here sure everything much more energy efficient. As someone wants to read about Tesla turbine efficiency is here http://www.imp.gda.pl/osrodki-naukow...turbiny-tesli/ Andrew |
||
|
28 Feb 2015, 16:07 (Ref:3510067) | #316 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Next video of the Red Baron Windmill prototype "Effect spoons" ... Now, despite the simplicity of the prototype and are not necessarily matched the gap between the wing and the small fan, already takes off at a speed of 25 km / hour or 7 m / sec wind speed. At 40 km / h, the fan spins very quickly., Much better. than in the experiment with a single wing ..
http://youtu.be/yyHTAlXLuXo Regards Andrew |
||
|
28 Feb 2015, 18:49 (Ref:3510103) | #317 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,984
|
so whats the end game here? some sort of flying car?
|
||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
5 Mar 2015, 00:56 (Ref:3511863) | #318 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Now why I summoned Riccardo..Ricardo developed fairly firebox V-Comet .. Especially in diesel played a significant role - helped make a high speed diesel engine .In my also applied the swirl chamber, knowing about its merits. The eyebrow appearances, this is what you see on the animation, this is not the combustion chamber. It is only the cross section through the center of the engine combustion . At the rear, with the cross-sectional view as seen in the picture, it is a channel connecting the piston "sucking" piston "exhaust". Flows this way the entire load of fuel and air, but it achieves a very high speed, which in the initial attempts resulted in taking ionized air from between the spark plug electrodes and prevented the formation of spark .Only after a magnification of this channel, began to develop a spark. If sweeping spark plug, this place was a diesel injector, it would be very beneficial ,, because after falling into the space above the small pistons with a very high speed, it would be very intense spin and excellent mixing of fuel and air. I think it is possible to build a high speed diesel, well, up to 10 000 RPM. Also on gasoline this spinning is beneficial and Ground your walls on the smallest piston, is probably the smallest of the previously used, and the heat losses are the smallest .Also at such a high speed of rotation of the smallest piston samozapłonów foci formation will be very difficult. Apart from this place, burning virtually runs elsewhere, because the distance between the planes must be greater than two millimeters in height, so that there could arise a flame. In total combustion occurs with forced intensive centrifugation only over a small piston in the cylinder least .. This is the very Riccardo improved swirl chamber, with the movement of loads in one direction and forced mechanically great speed of combustion. Looking only at the same animations, we are not able to notice it all properly. Today on the combustion chamber.
Andrew |
||
|
6 Apr 2015, 22:08 (Ref:3524493) | #319 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Once got for free the new "Porsche"? I got it, although in the smaller scale, but after that "Porsche" is "Porsche"
I was once at the Centre for Research and Development "Porsche" in Weissach in Germany yet ... I looked through patents "Porsche", and they mine, and it gave opinions .. they said they do not do those of their even, because they have no money .. But apparently I recognition, because "Porsche" I .. So in general, this visit was pretty inspiring .. Andrew |
||
|
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 (Ref:3528203) | #320 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Here, the film made using the experience to lift air wing. So yes, at the beginning of the film can be seen in the enclosure fan that blows the wind a piece of the wing, cut the stropianu, and nałożonegona these two metal rods that utzrymuja it in a horizontal position and transferred to the balanced Machinery with electronic scales, which shows the size of the wing lift when the wind blows at him with a fan .. size of this force is minimal and barely can observe the movement of machinery. The experience is best several possible KINDS wings of varying thickness profile, which can be changed in a device measuring and watch the size of the lift (which produces leaf vacuum) .. Thanks to this I like the wing of a set of experiments, it turned around and walked to the wing installed on your device . The wind from the fan created between them, comparatively very high vacuum. This vacuum is so huge that in gets called when I wanted to raise above the upper wing, lower, despite a solid metal load measuring machine, also raised very high up. This example shows that the strength of Spoon Effect, is several times greater than the single wing lift force, and thus, it is possible to use the vacuum between them several times larger ....
You see, with my theory, practice works well also.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1q2...&feature=share Andrew |
||
|
17 Apr 2015, 12:04 (Ref:3528204) | #321 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Here on this simulation, made to explain the effect of ground on which it is about as shown in red, the increase in pressure, which float plane in the vicinity of the land that it represents a lower profile. And it is clear that the intensity of the red color that hypertension is very high and justifies the construction of such aircraft .it strongly an increased pressure in paktyce operates up to 3 meters above the flat surface of the earth
Coincidentally, in this simulation also shows a very intense blue vacuum which interests me, for good performance Windmill Red Baron. can be seen clearly very intense blue color, providing the emerging high-vacuum, which practically see in the video above .. Here are not only rake angles are important, but also the distance between these profiles, as well as setting between the longitudinal profiles, which is not necessarily also be symmetric. Also there is a completely new profile with a gap, certainly will little affect on its size. After these few facts, I can estimate that the vacuum, with well-chosen all dimensions and angles profiles can be 20 times larger than the negative pressure created by a single profile .. It is a very good message for the Red Baron Windmill https://youtu.be/z1QOp_9IWLc Andrew |
||
|
17 Apr 2015, 13:07 (Ref:3528226) | #322 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
23 Apr 2015, 10:19 (Ref:3530224) | #323 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Such experience existing in the Museum of Aviation, showing the magnitude of the resistance of various airfoil, by replacing and inserting a rod, profiles of different thicknesses .. I used it to show the enormous size of the vacuum between the two profiles airlines, facing each other, "stomachs" .. So yes went my experience: first suspended weighed on an electronic scale, which is the size of kilograms of force needed to raise the single wing slid over to the bars .. turned out that about 300 Grams. that is to pick up all the rods and wing forces need 300 Grams vacuum. Applying a second similar profile, "belly" to that, at the time of blowing "wind" velocity of about 10 km / h. effects can be seen in the movie .. The strength of the vacuum, causing such rapid weight increase this up must have a value of about 1000 Grams (1KG) .. The Wing has a length of about 30 cm, on that basis, I present a first estimate of the forces in the world .. Namely, when length of about a meter, such wings, this force would have a value of about 3 KG ... or even if only 30% of the force could be used in Windmill Red Baron, its size would be about 1 KG with wings 1 meter .. Now you can try to calculate much larger projects, estimated at least ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kH6sdSjTrc Andrew |
||
|
26 Apr 2015, 08:25 (Ref:3530892) | #324 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
gruntguru, on 24 Apr 2015 - 00:29, said:
Your "enormous vacuum" (taking the figure of 1 kg on an area of 300mm x 300mm) works out to about 110Pa, 0.11kPa or 1/1000th of one atmosphere. That is plenty of pressure difference if you want to make an aeroplane fly but very little if you want to turn a generator. Oh no , no ,no, .. I'm sorry but your argument is a little convoluted .. After the show I open an airplane that with such surface wings 30 cm X 30 cm, with a weight of 1 KG can fly at speeds of 10 km / h ... Minimum of the minimum speed is 100 km / h. Now this: What is the wind ?? The wind is created when there is a difference of pressure air (i.e., on the one hand must be vacuum) Now tell me, what is the difference of pressure between these points: 2 km in front of the windmill and two kilometers behind him .. sure there a lot smaller than me, and more than one megawatt generator drives the few, the difference of pressure, which can be even only 1 / 100000 ... one atmosphere. Despite the huge amount of fans suppliers provide free energy. Such airplanes as ekranoplan have only 1/10 of an aircraft wing surface normal, and even a few hundred tons of flying over water., Is Hypertension .. For me, it is the same big (or and bigger) but the vacuum .. And it's certainly enough to generator drive .. I make such a system of reinforced concrete, 10 times bigger than the Boeing 747 is not technically any problems .. And certainly when compared to the size of a normal fan can by tens of times more energy in the generator. than a traditional windmill. Well at the end, I show 'windmill, which at a diameter of 30 cm, and a wind speed of 10 km / h will give us the potency of its axis 1 KG rotary or thrust .. well ...... So is mine is really huge compared to what you knew so far . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_effect_vehicle Andrew |
||
|
14 May 2015, 01:52 (Ref:3537283) | #325 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Such a message regarding my two wings. When you are so positioned, with an angle of about 60 degrees, when you measured the exact speed of 4 m / sec wind from a fan, a small windmill starts at high speed ..
four meters per second is 14.4 km / h, it means that we can experiment while riding a bicycle .... Andrew |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differential | silente | Racing Technology | 6 | 11 Jun 2006 07:02 |
Qualifying differential | skidmark | Formula One | 7 | 29 Jun 2000 05:27 |