|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Jan 2014, 23:37 (Ref:3357720) | #351 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Oak is in the 1:43's and the HPDs are at 1:42 even thought they have had a ton more time at Daytona then conquest ever had. |
|||
|
23 Jan 2014, 23:38 (Ref:3357721) | #352 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,232
|
I don't have the foggiest as to what has happened here, but the times by themselves are pretty telling. If these transfer to the race, with endurance racing being a "flat out" affair, it's going to be an absolute DP runaway. I guess we'll see.
Sandbagging? Isn't that strictly against the rules in TUSC? Of course BoP wasn't the issue for ESM; they didn't get BoP-ed to 3rd and 5th in PC; they just flat out missed it. |
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
23 Jan 2014, 23:41 (Ref:3357723) | #353 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Whatever the reasons, TUSC has allowed the worst possible situation to arise: there is essentially no way anything but a DP will win. I don’t want to imply that the fix is in … bit it sure as $h!7 worked out that way. It isn’teven close.
This calls into question the legitimacy of TUSC as a racing series. This whole idea of, “We’ll give Daytona to the Rolex cars and Sebring to the ALMS cars” is crap, it isn’t racing. When the outcome is determined in advance, it isn’t sport. I don’t care if a DP wins, but I care a lot if the DP doesn’t have to earn the win. I care a lot if some cars simply do not have a chance to win, despite being nominally in the same class and on par with the other cars in the top class. TUSC had better be planning last minute AoP measures tonight. |
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 00:04 (Ref:3357729) | #354 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Long Beach in many ways is similar to Daytona... slow corner, followed by acceleration. Daytona also has top speed, where Long Beach doesn't. The P2's advantages are medium to high speed corners, as long as the straight isn't too long. ------------------ The marquee events are critical to have a chance for either formula to win. If over a season the formulas are even, but one formula has the advantage at the Marquee events, you can guess which formula will have all the cars in a couple of seasons. |
|||
|
24 Jan 2014, 00:05 (Ref:3357731) | #355 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 125
|
There was no video recording of the qual? If true, then this is a bad start for the series. One of the reasons I loved ALMS, WEC, etc is to be able to see qual also.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 00:13 (Ref:3357736) | #356 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
|
Hopefully at race pace, the prototypes will show to be a little more equal. But if they don't, is it really a surprise? It was very unlikely to be able to take two entirely different types of race car and make them completely equal at every track in one off-season of very limited testing. That is just way too much to ask. The first few races and possibly the first season in its entirety, is gonna see a lot of adjustments from race to race to try and get the formula right, and probably a lot of lopsided races (either in the DP direction or the P2 direction) throughout the season. It is an unfortunate side effect of the merger that will take more than a limited off-season to fix. This year will have some growing pains in the P class. Hopefully the other 3 classes will help us get through it with some close racing and by the end of the year or next year, the formula will be adjusted and tweaked enough that the P2s and DPs are level at every track. It won't happen over night though.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 00:14 (Ref:3357737) | #357 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
|||
|
24 Jan 2014, 00:17 (Ref:3357739) | #358 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
According to Dailysportscar, the OAK Morgan had a misfire and both of the ESM HPDs had electronic problems which prevented them from using full power.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 00:28 (Ref:3357741) | #359 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,711
|
Preview show on FS1 (started @ 7:00PM) is pretty darn good.
|
||
__________________
It's great to be here! |
24 Jan 2014, 01:01 (Ref:3357748) | #360 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 984
|
|||
__________________
Tim "Travel makes a wise man better, and a fool worse." Thomas Fuller |
24 Jan 2014, 01:26 (Ref:3357751) | #361 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
ESM and Oak did appear to have problems ... Muscle Milk, who knows? Thing is, the performance of the DPs relative to the P2s is the same now as it was at theRoar: 1.5 seconds advantage per lap.
Looking at all the cars over all the sessions, both Roar and Rolex practice ... DPs are much faster. Saying it is impossible to balance the classes ... somehwo ALMS managed to balance Porsches, Corvettes, BMWs and Ferraris. Balancing different cars isn't That big a deal. Cutting the revs on the DPs by a few hundred would likely have cut the top speed just enough that over a lap that the lap times could be equal, even if the DPs were still considerably faster. Right now the P2s have as much chance to win overall as the PCs do ... or as the GTDs have to beat the GTLMs. Teams have to hope the fast cars break. That's not racing---when we are talking about cars nominally in the same class. |
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 01:26 (Ref:3357752) | #362 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
|
||
|
24 Jan 2014, 01:37 (Ref:3357753) | #363 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,264
|
They need to cut the DP engines back, the whole let them run at 600hp thing is crock. Cut the power back 100hp and it should even things out more.
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
24 Jan 2014, 01:41 (Ref:3357754) | #364 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,493
|
Three cars fail tech inspection, get sent to the pack of the pack:
#78 Starworks Motorsport (qualified 3rd in P) -- ride height infraction and an unapproved aerodynamic device. #48 Paul Miller Racing (qualified 1st in GTD) -- rear wing endplate violation #46 Fall-Line Audi Motorsports (qualified 3rd in GTD) -- ride height infraction. John Dagys article here. |
||
__________________
“Sometimes there’s no poison like a dream.” — Tanya Donelly |
24 Jan 2014, 01:51 (Ref:3357757) | #365 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
The LMP2s are now within the top 10 in night practice, about 1 second off the leaders, I don't think they'll need to do a whole lot more. Maybe a couple hundred revs from the DPs or so.
Also, good news is that the #07 Mazda is now faster than the back 5th of the GTD cars Feel really bad for Christopher Haase, got a day in the spotlight and then falls right back down Last edited by FstrthnU; 24 Jan 2014 at 01:58. |
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 02:23 (Ref:3357762) | #366 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,154
|
Quote:
I wonder what the tolerance factor for staying within performance that the officials will be watching? They want to park over-performers in a penalty box half an hour before the end, but I can not imagine they would park a huge percentage of the field if they all exceeded performance levels. Should be interesting |
|||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
24 Jan 2014, 02:34 (Ref:3357763) | #367 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,336
|
|||
|
24 Jan 2014, 02:38 (Ref:3357764) | #368 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 690
|
Didnt the ALMS teams get destroyed at Le Mans last year? It takes a time to learn a new tire.
I dont think the entire gap from DP to P2 comes down to the tires, but I think thats why theres hesitation to make more adjustments to the performance of the cars. Besides, it would be kind of silly to let 5 P2s outpace 12 DPs, especially after all the money those teams spent upgrading their cars. The real concerning issue to me is the pace of the Corvette DPs over everyone else. With the Ford DP reliability issues this could be another runaway like last year if not worse. |
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 02:43 (Ref:3357765) | #369 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 914
|
What are the chances that the Mazda finishes ahead of the PC champion in a single race this year?
|
||
|
24 Jan 2014, 02:56 (Ref:3357768) | #370 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
What is the expected fuel economy/pit stop differences between dip and p2? Will p2 be able to go a lap or two more per stop? Also, it will be a huge problem if all the marque events favor one or the other, but I imagine the p2s will have a similar advantage at sending as the dps do at Daytona.
You know, a second or less a lap difference is about what alms used to have between Audi/Peugeot and the rest too. So far all the p2 teams look like works in progress on a new track and new tires. None of them are fully sorted yet, except esm who have had myriad issues. In short, I'm not overly concerned yet. |
|
|
24 Jan 2014, 02:59 (Ref:3357769) | #371 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,617
|
Glad to see the website is still a **** show. I've been looking for the session results pages for 10 minutes, can someone help me out?
|
||
|
24 Jan 2014, 03:05 (Ref:3357770) | #372 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,493
|
Quote:
The right side of the Daytona race page has links to all practice session times, plus qualifying, and the provisional grid: http://www.imsa.com/races/rolex-24-daytona |
|||
__________________
“Sometimes there’s no poison like a dream.” — Tanya Donelly |
24 Jan 2014, 03:06 (Ref:3357771) | #373 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 932
|
Quote:
|
||
|
24 Jan 2014, 03:09 (Ref:3357772) | #374 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,617
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
24 Jan 2014, 03:24 (Ref:3357775) | #375 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,516
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rolex 24 at Daytona | HJJ | Trackside | 17 | 20 Mar 2014 20:17 |
Rolex 24 @ Daytona | thebear | North American Racing | 309 | 4 Feb 2013 03:33 |
Rolex 24 at Daytona anyone? | TrueBlueFlyer | Marshals Forum | 8 | 31 Jan 2013 20:26 |
Rolex 24 at Daytona - Jan 2007 | Steve Tarrant | Marshals Forum | 4 | 20 Nov 2006 19:33 |